Recognizing how piss poor something is is not the same as looking for something to hate.
No I don't expect Nintendo to invent new battery tech. It would be nice if they designed a console that didn't have a drawback for much of the features of its design. The whole system tries to be a jack of two trades and ends up being a master of none.
First of all most people already have those for their smartphones, but also it's not like you cannot live without it, if you've been playing fine with your handhelds(3DS/Vita) without battery pack so far, then you won't have any problem with Switch, being battery life on pair with those
that's literally the same battery life 3DS has, you can check on youtube and find videos which prove that 3DS manages something like 2.5 hours of gameplay with MGS 3, about 3 Hours with Mario 3D Land and Zelda OOT, that's pretty much the same we will get with Switch
It was a real problem with the 3DS. The fact that they're doing it again doesn't magically make it OK
Eh I'm not complaining about the battery life for the Switch - it was kinda expected really. But my Vita definitely lasts a lot longer than 3 hours. It's better than my DS4s.
Yet another accessory you need to buy for this thing to make it worth it.
Please compare the Switch to any other device which plays games (even smartphones/tablets) and tell me whether or not the battery life (for playing games) is piss poor compared to every other similar consumer electronic device.
The point of this is, the Switch's battery is objectively far higher capacity than any other gaming device. And it has a similar battery life as any other gaming device (3DS/Vita). Why is it suddenly being treated as piss poor, when it meets or exceeds every similar competitor?
Remember, the range is 2.5 to 6 hours, not <2.5 hours.
3 hours out of the box. How long will it last 1 or 2 years in? Shame we can't manually replace it like the gamepad or the DS.
I've been hearing people complaining about that since last week reveal, but i just let them go, now i was listening to the latest Giant Bombcast and here it is, Jeff Gerstmann saying over and over how Switch won't be a good handheld with that declared battery life, making even fun of it.
Now Switch battery life will be between 2.5 and 6 hours, we'll be able to play Zelda Botw for 3 hours straight, that's literally the same battery life 3DS has, you can check on youtube and find videos which prove that 3DS manages something like 2.5 hours of gameplay with MGS 3, about 3 Hours with Mario 3D Land and Zelda OOT, that's pretty much the same we will get with Switch, which unlike the 3DS isn't only a handheld, and will run way more demanding games than 3DS. Also remember that you can easily charge Switch on the go using battery packs and type c cables(which nowadays are very common for Android phones), of course you still can do that with 3DS too, but you first have to find a cable from standard usb to 3DS charging port.
Because people believed Nintendo would come up with some magical new battery tech and solve a problem the entire industry can not solve.
Obviously.
The battery life is piss poor even when comparing it to other devices whose battery life is piss poor.
Because people expect an evolution in hardware/technology after so many years. Yet here we are with a barely better Wii U.
If they're saying 2.5-6, you know it's going to be even less then that. That's probably with wifi off and brightness all the way down.
So basically people are complaining because battery technology has not advanced at all like microelectronics? That's a fair complaint, just one that probably shouldn't be directed at Nintendo.
Ooh, ooh! I know! I know!
If making a portable Wii U results in the battery life being shit, how about...
Don't make a portable Wii U
Nintendo Company, Ltd., 11-1 Kamitoba-hokotate-cho, Minami-ku, Kyoto 601-8501, Japan. Phone +1181756629600 Fax +1181756629620
Please compare the Switch to any other device which plays games (even smartphones/tablets) and tell me whether or not the battery life (for playing games) is piss poor compared to every other similar consumer electronic device.
The point of this is, the Switch's battery is objectively far higher capacity than any other modern gaming device. And it has a similar battery life as any other gaming device (3DS/Vita). Why is it suddenly being treated as piss poor, when it meets or exceeds every similar competitor?
Remember, the range is 2.5 to 6 hours, not <2.5 hours.
Everyone that releases a portable device with lackluster battery life tends to get flack. Nintendo is simply next in line.
So because something else sucks, it's OK for this too suck as well?
So basically people are complaining because battery technology has not advanced at all like microelectronics? That's a fair complaint, just one that probably shouldn't be directed at Nintendo.
It is pretty shocking. 3DS was rated at 3 hours at launch and it was fine.