Pretty sad that being inclusionary is now considered being far left.
^This. Hopefully in the future this will change as both sides progress and begin to adopt new platforms and policies to win over different voting demographics.
Pretty sad that being inclusionary is now considered being far left.
Being anti-racist, anti-bigotry, and anti-discrimination in the US makes you either Centet-left or just Left, not Far Left.From an American POV it might be far left, but from a European POV it's more like centre-left. Being inclusive and anti-racist/anti-bigotry/anti-discrimination isn't far left, it's being a decent human being.
From an American POV it might be far left, but from a European POV it's more like centre-left. Being inclusive and anti-racist/anti-bigotry/anti-discrimination isn't far left, it's being a decent human being.
Forums with a rep or like or thanks system are the worst.Penny-Arcade's forum is further left, and their commendation system really feeds that dopamine drip of gunning for social points rather than creating and continuing thoughtful discussion. GAF might go overboard sometimes with people re-quoting great posts or meme gifs, but there's nothing worse than every single post being an attempt at affirmation.
Because right wingers get banned more often?
Forums with a rep or like or thanks system are the worst.
SomethingAwful's debate board is more left than NeoGAF and especially used to be so when the openly communist sub-board Laissez's Fair was around.
NeoGAF is not far left. It is a very technocratic liberal site with progressive social leanings. There are a number of us socialists here but we are outnumbered. We're tolerated rather than banned however because the far left has good intentions and can be debated with while the far right does not and can not.
It's a video-game forum. Video-games tend to be consumed by the younger demographic, the younger demographic tends to be more liberal. In addition, the moderation team are very punitive towards those who transgress certain liberal norms, which even further reduces the number of non-liberals; and conversely this attracts certain minority groups protected by liberal norms who feel threatened in other forums.
It's hard to say really. First and foremost this is a gaming site so a majority of posters do not discuss politics. Most GAFfers don't visit OT and an incredibly small percentage even know that PoliGAF OT exists. Furthermore, those who frequent OT know that right-wing politics is discouraged.
It's easy to think that a few hardcore posters in PoliGaf/OT is ALL of GAF, but it's hardly the case at all. Most people here would rather talk about Pokémon Go or Final Fantasy.
Forums with a rep or like or thanks system are the worst.
NeoGaf is not inclusionary. It's a tightly controlled membership with frequent bannings and fairly strict rules (in comparison). It's definitely exclusionary. I like it the way it is, but it's not inclusionary at all.
Being anti-racist, anti-bigotry, and anti-discrimination in the US makes you either Centet-left or just Left, not Far Left.
I would classify NeoGAF as Center Left.
NeoGAF is not far left. Only a few loudmouthed posters may be, but think about it: most of us abhor things like socialism. Even someone like Bernie Sanders, who is not that far on the left to begin with, is looked unfavorably here.
Because you choose the people there, this is an echochamber made by the mods, that's an echochamber made exclusively by youcomparing neogaf to twitter and facebook is odd. my twitter feed is heavily left. as is my facebook feed.
"Certain liberal norms" meaning don't insult people to their face or say something overtly bigoted/discriminatory/sexist/racist/homophobic?It's a video-game forum. Video-games tend to be consumed by the younger demographic, the younger demographic tends to be more liberal. In addition, the moderation team are very punitive towards those who transgress certain liberal norms, which even further reduces the number of non-liberals; and conversely this attracts certain minority groups protected by liberal norms who feel threatened in other forums.
Without question. We see that every day.Far left can be racist and bigoted too. Shit we saw that shit just this year.
I'm pretty sure the poster meant inclusionary in terms of accepting people for who they are: gender, sexual preference, lifestyle choices, etc...
The right tend to be less accepting of these things than the left.
I'd say this isn't really true of the gaming community, as evidenced by the vileness of many large gaming communities on the internet.
NeoGaf is not inclusionary. It's a tightly controlled membership with frequent bannings and fairly strict rules (in comparison). It's definitely exclusionary. I like it the way it is, but it's not inclusionary at all.
Almost everyone thinks they have good intentions, they just disagree about what makes an intention good. Because GAF is centre-left, the extent of the disagreement about what the good is tends be relatively small with the far-left and the centre-right, to the extent there is some basic common ground to have discussion within a limited framework. That common ground doesn't exist w.r.t. the far-right, so you can't have any real discussion.
Is there a site that's futher left than this, that you could give an example of?
I feel like this site is ultra progressive/left.
Passing you my "Prove it ticket"
It almost has to be far left to be able to accept all the walks of life that play games and common decency. I'm not left at all but the only way GAF can work as well as it does is if it is tolerant to the differences that bind us. Maybe it is a vocal minority that makes is seem that way. Rather that than a bunch of hate speech bu t this place is pretty liberal to me.
I think that tends to be a very vocal minority, though. Off the top of my head, most large predominantly gaming forums I can think of - GameFAQs, NeoGAF, SomethingAwful, even /r/gaming by the surveys they used to have in there - lean liberal. They just don't look it because most people don't really care enough about politics to talk about it. So people associate say /r/gaming with GamerGate even though it was a consistently minority opinion that was just very loud and used /r/gaming as a platform to organize. The only thing that separates GAF is that GAF bans that vocal minority.
"Certain liberal norms" meaning don't insult people to their face or say something overtly bigoted/discriminatory/sexist/racist.
Passing you my "Prove it ticket"
It almost has to be far left to be able to accept all the walks of life that play games and common decency. I'm not left at all but the only way GAF can work as well as it does is if it is tolerant to the differences that bind us. Maybe it is a vocal minority that makes is seem that way. Rather that than a bunch of hate speech bu t this place is pretty liberal to me.
Because you choose the people there, this is an echochamber made by the mods, that's an echochamber made exclusively by you
I don't really get the comparison either
again, not a great comparison. curated feed as opposed to a message board. there are definitely right leaning and far right people on tumblr too. just some parts of the "progressive" side of it has been made into an internet joke, therefore everyone using tumblr must be of that level.Tumblr. Although they are so far up their own asses that they've come full circle and sometimes you cannot make the distinction. Look up "Tumblr vs Stormfront" on Google for some laughs
Simply because the mods are far left.
I heavily applaud the moderation for the upkeep of forum discourse.
Don't they then run the risk of losing the sensible people?
I think that job has been automated though. Now the former mods are hosting Trump rallies while the Modbots pretend to be former people accounts.
#ModbotTruthers
But in honesty I would argue it's more centric while still being on the right on some things, by European Socialist Scum standards. Which is pretty much US politics in a nutshell anyway.
Because you need a college or office email address, and college-educated people typically lean left.
That extra barrier is enough.
Hillary Clinton is not far-left.