-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
Why is Overwatch $40 for PC but $60 for PS4 and Xbox One?
- Thread starter The_Dama
- Start date
Crankshaft
Member
The origin edition doesn't make sense for console. How many console gamers are going to redeem a pet in wow or a cosmetic item in diablo?
I'm enjoying the beta but I'm going to wait for a sale.
I'm enjoying the beta but I'm going to wait for a sale.
ScaryShark
Banned
I'm buying it since I don't have a choice but the $20 difference for the digital items you get is a hilarious rip off.
That said, what I've seen and enjoyed of the game easily makes it worth $60 to me.
That said, what I've seen and enjoyed of the game easily makes it worth $60 to me.
KojiKnight
Member
It's anti consumer that blizzard offers a cheaper version where they can (on pc, on their own storefront where they don't have to pay fees to anyone else) instead of forcing everyone to the higher price point?
Wouldn't it be the other way around?
D
Deleted member 325805
Unconfirmed Member
Well it's a lot better IMO.
Yea, I really liked it but I don't know if I can justify full price.
It's not though.
Considering the amount of content in the game, it shouldn't be priced $60 altogether.
The $40 version is a bit overpriced still, but more reasonnable.
The sweet price point for this game should be around $30 to be honest.
Without even dwelling down to the gameplay.
TF2 has mod support, custom servers that can run custom maps, audio, modes, skins, extra features etc. What's more is that it allows for a community to grow where you play with familiar people depending on the time of day and you don't have to rely on devs and their rather incompetent anti cheat solution (like Valve's VAC) to ban cheaters since admins can do that for their servers. Because of this the game will pretty much stay alive for years to come despite being almost a decade old.
It is the quintessential "PC multiplayer experience" that Overwatch lacks and will forever lack because Blizzard doesn't like any of this.
This game has tons of content as-is and is getting free content updates.
Not trying to be an apologist, but you have to evaluate this compared to other multi games.
This game is leaps and bounds over similar multi games.
MMaRsu
Member
Ok and why is that?
This game has free content coming in the form of free heroes, maps and probably modes as well.
And it will be supported for a long time with free updates.
Maybe You'd rather they price it at 40$ and charge 45 for a season pass? Like is common these days? Their free content system should be applauded.
Because the game is actually $40?
The $60 version is the $40 game with extras...extras that make little sense for a console player. Few virtual items for games most of which aren't even on consoles.
If the base game was $40 only because Blizzard is cutting the middle man and selling it directly like many people like to believe,
then Origins Edition should be less than $60 on Battle.net by the virtue of not having any middle man...but it's not, it costs the same as Origins edition from Amazon or any other seller...regardless of the platform.
Why do people say games are less expensive on PC? For exclusive or indie games, sure, but AAA games are often the same price as on consoles.
Just look at Fallout 4 on Steam, still 80$CAN. Doom? 80$CAN. Mirror Edge Catalyst pre-order? 80$CAN. Battlefront was 80$CAN when it launched. And so on...
I'm going to guess it's pretty the same for US.
Just look at Fallout 4 on Steam, still 80$CAN. Doom? 80$CAN. Mirror Edge Catalyst pre-order? 80$CAN. Battlefront was 80$CAN when it launched. And so on...
I'm going to guess it's pretty the same for US.
I honestly thought this game is free-to-play. It definitely looks like that.
I don't deny it is fun and action packed, but in the end it's multiplayer only. In the past few years we had so many people complain that $60 is too much for such games, like Titanfall or Rainbow 6, as much that Respawn had to promise a campaign for TF2.
And now all of a sudden it should be fine to charge that much?
All the best to Blizzard, hope for their sake that they manage to sell a healthy number of copies, but I simply cannot give them that much money for that much (or little) content.
Maybe one day when it's on a huge sale, or when they add more modes and maps.
I don't deny it is fun and action packed, but in the end it's multiplayer only. In the past few years we had so many people complain that $60 is too much for such games, like Titanfall or Rainbow 6, as much that Respawn had to promise a campaign for TF2.
And now all of a sudden it should be fine to charge that much?
All the best to Blizzard, hope for their sake that they manage to sell a healthy number of copies, but I simply cannot give them that much money for that much (or little) content.
Maybe one day when it's on a huge sale, or when they add more modes and maps.
Umm Rachet & Clank says hello....
Because many publishers choose to charge $60 for PC games same as console even though they don't have to pay licensing fees, because greed. There was a time when AAA publishers on PC charged a bit less than console, but then they realised they can charge full price anyway early/mid last gen.
orthodoxy1095
Banned
W-wh-what? That's...that's now how this works.
The game is $60 on console because of the middle-man in Sony/MS. That doesn't preclude selling a $60 version on the PC.
LordRaptor
Member
e:
Its about retail margins, Sony aren't paying Sony royalty fees, so they can afford to offer a below MSRP pricepoint at retail where third parties who do have to pay Sony royalty fees cannot
Why is it $60 on PC (for the same edition) then?
If it's $60 on consoles due to middle man then surely cutting them out should bring the cost down from $60.
I said generally. Ratchet and Clank is a nice exception. However, look last gen publishers literally stopped selling games in this price range because of all the failures.
D
Deleted member 325805
Unconfirmed Member
I've been playing shooters on PC since the 90s, I understand the appeal of the features you listed but at the end of the day fun is all that matters and for me Overwatch is the most fun I've had in a very long time, it has been a breath of fresh air in a stale genre. Blizzard have created something accessible with a lot of hidden depth that's a blast to play, and with their resources they can evolve it into something truly special and I have faith they'll support it for years to come just like they have with Diablo III which they transformed from decent to incredible, hell even Diablo II gets the odd update.
orthodoxy1095
Banned
I don't see what's hard to grasp here.
PC: no middle-man
Sell base $40 version, sell a $60 version for anyone who wants skins and shit for other Blizzard titles similar to the collector's editions in other games.
Console: middle-man
Sell a $60 version to recoup losses.
The alternative here is Blizzard selling the $40 version with no extras to console users for $60. But that would have produced an outcry from users for having to pay the extra $20 but not getting what the PC fellows got.
Count of Monte Sawed-Off
un33dab@dpu$$y
The Amazon Prime price is what ultimately let me justify buying the game at launch. I'd rather have bought it digitally, but it kind of sucks knowing there's a $40 version out there on another platform.
And this. Most of the extras included in the console release are bizarre. They make sense for the PC $60 version I guess (still doesn't seem like much for an extra $20), just not the console version.
orthodoxy1095
Banned
In the future, I'm sure Blizzard will take note of people's lack of utility for the extra items and be more than happy to sell us a $60 version of a game with no extras at all.
Count of Monte Sawed-Off
un33dab@dpu$$y
Pretty much what they're doing now.
krameriffic
Member
I don't know if it will forever lack all of that, but if they add mod support and private games it will be more akin to the SC2 and Dota 2 model where it's all closely moderated and built in as part of the game itself.
-MD-
Member
This is funny, for a game many people will put thousands of hours into, where future maps and characters will be free.
LordOfChaos
Member
This difference isn't all too unusual, PC often has cheaper games sooner after launch.
Crimsonclaw111
Member
Maybe if you're not looking anywhere but Steam, sure. You can go to any other site and usually find a 20 percent off or more coupon very easily.
Because if you buy your PC games directly on Steam/Origin/UPlay then you are doing it wrong.
I haven't paid more than 35 for any PC game I bought in the last years.
I buy deluxe Editions + season pass for the same or less Price than you get the Standard Version on Steam.
Not Shopping around on PC means you don't care about your Money. Which is fine,if you don't care, but I personally do.
Is the retail PC version a code? I'd like to go this route for GCU, but I don't have a optical drive in my PC.
MekaDragon
Member
Royalties. Videogame publishers has to pay this "taxes" in order to release their games on consoles.
D
Deleted member 325805
Unconfirmed Member
Yes sir, I never pay full price for PC games. Buying directly from Steam is rarely the correct choice unless the item is on sale. IsThereAnyDeal (all official resellers) + CDKeys (unofficial but legit) are my go to sites when I'm buying games and I never pay anywhere close to retail.
I grabbed Overwatch Origins for £31 opposed to £45 from Blizzard directly, saving £14 (and often more) on every game really starts to add up over the course of a year. And unless I'm mistaken Overwatch was even cheaper before beta, but then it became apparent it was awesome so the price got jacked up.
Ban Puncher
Member
BECAUSE YOU'LL PAY IT, SHEEP.
First..there is no restriction on that prevents them to put out a $40 version that costs...$40. Secondly if you are saying that they are only selling the more expensive version on consoles to recoup losses due to middle man then why is the PC Origins edition $60? Those extra skins and shit really work $20 extra if there is no middle man involved?
LordRaptor
Member
Nirolak made a topic breaking this all down, but I can't find it, but I did find this post:
tl;dr, the $40 retail model doesn't really work for third parties paying licence fees. It works out fine for MS / Sony / Nintendo published titles, because they don't have to pay anyone any licence fees.
Corpsepyre
Banned
So, when was the last time anyone bought a PC game for $60?
This is what's making me balk a little at the price. I wasn't able to play the beta as I was overseas but the general consensus seems to be that it was good.
For 40 dollars, I guess it's not bad. I can't imagine being a console player and paying that extra 20 though for useless digital goodies.
Vire
Member
The problem too, is that Blizzard games rarely if ever go on sale either. It's like Nintendo, they retain their value forever.
Kind of a bummer since I really don't want to drop 60 on this but I know it's going to stay that price for probably a year at least.
Doug Heffernan
Member
Wait a couple of weeks, it will go on sale for $40 real quickly.