Lot of tourists using cash.In particular?
Lot of tourists using cash.In particular?
Clearly im niave, but arent there better and more legal ways for youth to earn money? Cant see why police dont crack down hard on it.
Clearly im niave, but arent there better and more legal ways for youth to earn money? Cant see why police dont crack down hard on it.
I was in Paris a couple of weeks ago and was shocked at the amount of Romanians in the city. A lot of the Romanians in Paris are associated with minor crimes like pickpocketing, like over here in The Netherlands. I really had to keep an eye on my students as they were easy targets for pickpocketers. Be very alert when people approach you to fill in a petition: usually a ploy to distract you and rob you of your stuff. If you pay attention, the pickpocketers really stand out in places like The Louvre.
They do, but there's not much they can do about that. Assuming they catch a bunch of kids stealing wallets, what then ? They can't be thrown in jail, and they won't tell you who their parents are. They'll be thrown back on the street after a few hours and go back to their usual activity.
Sorry for going off topic in my own thread, but why do romanians/bulgarians get such a bad rap in the media of being the source of all the eu's immigration woes?
“Crime analysts at Europol estimate that Romanian and Bulgarian gangs are responsible for 90 per cent of all card-skimming crimes across Europe.”
I don't want to go to Paris anymore![]()
He's not really wrong though.So much racism in this post...
The people I knew in France hated Paris due to various reasons.
Never had mine stolen. If you're visiting just do like we do and don't trust anyone who approaches you. Especially if he/she is asking you if you speak english.
Large numbers of unskilled/criminal Romanians/Bulgarians moving to western Europe. A Romanian immigrant living in London is ~4-6x more likely to be arrested than a Polish immigrant.
http://blogs.channel4.com/factcheck/factcheck-romanian-crimewave/18207
Yeah, just be a little bit smart and you avoid 95% of the problems. Don't carry your wallet in your back pocket. When sitting, don't just leave your bag beside your chair (put your foot through it or something). Don't carry extra credit cards and stuff you don't need in case things get stolen.Sounds less like a pickpocket problem and more like an idiotic tourist problem. I saw a movie where this girl wore a contraption around her midsection that held all her valuables in a pouch. If I ever go to Europe, I'll be bringing me one of those no doubt.
Paris is small beans compared to Naples. Now that was a scary place, pickpocketing/cons wise
If you get out of Naples and all you got was pickpocketed, you're lucky. Or so I'm told.
I went to Paris, Barcelona, and Rome earlier this year and had no issues with pick pockets. According to statistics, I should have gone bankrupt by the end of the trip. Common sense goes a long way when it comes to things like this.
Paris is small beans compared to Naples. Now that was a scary place, pickpocketing/cons wise
Most people love Paris until they actually go there. It's really not what it's cracked up to be from what you see on TV. You're much better off going to some smaller more down to earth places around France.
And if you look at people who are Romani, it's because they are heavily discriminated against in Romania itself.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romani_people_in_Romania
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism_in_Romania
They're basically locked out of society and lack of education is rampant. This leads to very few legal opportunities in Romania itself leading to a form of mass emigration. But because they obviously can't compete for legal jobs in other European countries either - where they're also discriminated against, mind you - many turn to panhandling or petty crime.
The situation here in Sweden has become epidemic at this point. Not so much pick-pocketing but a massive rush of panhandlers. Up until the financial crisis it wasn't exceptionally noticeable but lately it's gotten almost farcical. It's difficult to find a grocery store in Sweden at this point that doesn't have a semi-permanent panhandler installed at the front door. I'm originally from a small town of some 10,000 people in the middle of nowhere in the Swedish forests. It has two grocery stores. Both have had permanent panhandlers since about a year and a half ago. Some of this is probable because Sweden has very liberal laws regarding panhandling: as long as you stick to public areas (which includes the immediate outside of stores) you're good to go and neither the public or the police are allowed to do anything to you except politely ask you to leave.
The public opinion is split over this. It's very much a part of the Swedish mentality to be accepting of poor people but a lot of people are growing tired of getting pestered for money every time they go out to buy a loaf of bread. Especially since panhandling was close to non-existent in Sweden up until very recently. There have even been a few incidents of vigilantism where panhandlers have had buckets of ice-water poured over them (in near-zero temperatures, mind you, which classifies as assault) and some have been chased out of smaller towns by veritable posses. Still, it's unclear if there will be any legislation against panhandling, as was recently introduced in Norway. The political climate simply doesn't allow it.
I should also point out that Sweden doesn't exactly have a rosy past regarding our treatment of Romani. They were classified as "travelers" and were habitually harassed by police until reasonably recently, not to mention targets of social services who didn't hesitate to take away their children for "reeducation". They were also targets for the darkest of Swedish past - the Eugenics movement - which led to many being institutionalized and sterilized by force, completely lawfully, until the law was finally repealed. In 1975.
So my point is basically that while Romani are indeed greatly over-represented in panhandling and petty crime it would be very wrong to ignore that the hideous discrimination they faced and continue to face both in Romania and the rest of Europe is playing a huge role in keeping them that way.
Lots of tourists.
And if you look at people who are Romani, it's because they are heavily discriminated against in Romania itself.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romani_people_in_Romania
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism_in_Romania
The article talks about Romanians, so everyone from the country Romania, and not just Roma right? Big difference there.It always feels very diet racism whenever euros start talking about the Romani. "But he isnt wrong" is a very common response. Reminds me of Americans and poor blacks and hispanics.
He's not really wrong though.
I was in New York a couple of weeks ago and was shocked at the amount of Blacks in the city. A lot of the blacks in New york are associated with crimes like mugging, like over here in Chicago. I really had to keep an eye on my students as they were easy targets for muggers. Be very alert when people approach you to fill in a petition: usually a ploy to distract you and rob you of your stuff. If you pay attention, the muggers really stand out in places like Times Square.
If he said this would you find that acceptable?
You've got to pick a pocket or two.
If that was true, why not? The difference is, in the case of blacks it's not. And black is a race.
So basically your saying that its okay to generalize an entire group of people? How about you learn to judge people individually instead of based on their ethnicity?
This. Applies to major tourist spots in the US as well.Every city has pick pockets. Don't make yourself a target and you are fine. It's really not hard. Don't carry around a big bag on your back hanging open. Don't leave shit sticking out of your back pockets. Don't let people crowd around you. Ignore people who come up to you asking you for stuff.
Nope, I'm saying he's not wrong. This has nothing to do with people generalizing about black people in the US.
Yes it does. You've failed to explain how the 2 cases are different. In both cases you've got people judging an entire group of people based off of stereotypes.