Is a game included? Like another nsmb? For some reason I thought it was just a toolset.
It comes with 100 premade levels, which is about how many are in a nsmb game
SonyToo!;177397688 said:As a side note I wonder if SMM will devalue their other 2D Mario's though
(I haven't read through the whole thread so sorry if this has being already brought up)
It's the price of whatever the market determines it's worth. It's the flagship Wii U game for 2015. It's been in development for at least 1.5 years, just counting the time since it was announced to the public in 2014.
I don't really understand your complaint, unless you just don't want to spend the money.
I need some amiibas for that.
Came for dumb
Received dumb
So that's essentially his deal. Along with the ignorance about content value, of course.
Unless they plan to roll out more stuff ala Splatoon to keep us interested. I don' think its honestly worth 60$.I want my slopes darnit
I do agree though, yes it is nice to see that they put in mind of having a UI design to be pretty yet workable. But I feel like so much is missing that they could have added to make deeper levels. Which they could implement in an easy way. But I feel like they think we are too 'stupid' for more advanced objects.
But who knows maybe someone will dig into the game once it comes and we find out there is slopes and all sorts of other objects to be usable or rolled out later.
Exactly. Too bad I only buy digitaly, and that it will never be on sale on the e-shopThe game is going to be overstocked, and it won't be long after release when you see the game drop $10-$20 from it's official price.
This guy is becoming a GAF classic already.Yep. Another quality dragonzdogma thread.
Never forget the ones he did about "Guacomolee" and "The Lasut of Us".
While OP didn't make the best points, I still think his main question is rather legitimate, and am rather surprised by the heat he's taking for it. The arguments suporting MM beeing 60$ aren't much smarter than the ones he made againts it imho.
Anyways, it'll be some time before we can debate again if a Wii U game is really worth 60$![]()
SMM uses probably more than 95% existing Graphics less than CTTT
Uses existing game play same like CTTT.So Honestly what gives?
I cant be the only one that feels it's a bit unfair no?
the answer to 'why is x y price' is always 'because the publisher thinks the market can bear the cost'
lol too stupid? They've added tons of things across versions that weren't in the original. Shit like missing slopes are because they didn't exist in SMB. They could have included them (like the bowser clown car) but concessions were made. They could have also left out all the great new things they've included too.
If you want games to be cheaper because you don't think enough work has been put into them, then you would also be okay with them being more expensive for the opposite reason, right?
If you want games to be cheaper because you don't think enough work has been put into them, then you would also be okay with them being more expensive for the opposite reason, right?
I read somewhere that Nintendo prices games based on what value they think it would bring to customers. I'd think this game would bring a lot of value at $60. Cpt. Toad or Rainbow Curse, not as much. That's why they had budget pricing.
Amazon has it for 49.99 if you have amazon prime.
I'm seeing 59.88 with my prime account
Add it to your cart. Savings appear near checkout.
Qualifying products have a little "Prime Members save more!" (or something similar) graphic below the product listing.
I have less of a problem with SMM's price and more of a problem of not having the excitement for it.
LIKE, AT ALL.
And I love Mario! But I don't know man. I'm just not feeling the hype.
Maybe when it comes out GAF'll light a fire under my ass.
Pretty sure some were saying how Splatoon should be a F2P or $20 game.
I certainly wouldn't pay 60 for it, but I guess this thread is proof that some would.
I have the EU version pre-ordered for 45, but will probably cancel. Editor games don't appeal to me.
I feel like a lot of the responses to OP are choosing to ignore the point he's trying to make:
Clearly he's saying that the resources that were applied to this game were far less than what you normally associate with a full priced AAA title. To be fair, that is beyond obviously true.
Does that mean that this game is automatically worth less than $60? No, but I do think that if the novelty of building your own levels doesn't undeniably connect with you, then it's likely that even as a big Mario game fan, there's a good chance that you won't be as likely to bite as you would at $40.
If this was Mario Galaxy 3, I'd have stepped over the backs of the people in line to pick up preorders, to get it first....but like the OP this is more of a wait and see title at full price, especially in this game-heavy season. Not sure that sentiment warrants such dismissive responses, it seems pretty reasonable, actually, though I think it could have been expressed differently.
Lol why did you pre order it to begin with then? Is the act of pre ordering a thing for some people?
Yep. Another quality dragonzdogma thread.
Never forget the ones he did about "Guacomolee" and "The Lasut of Us".
Because it has a fancy art book and an amiibo. And amazon preorders are free, last I checked?