But for me, summer also means weeks of expensive camps, summer reading packets, and the challenge of trying to write articles amid dozens of interruptions. At several points during this years summer break, I found myself wishing that my kids were back in school.
Why is the school year almost always limited to 180 days? And why do most schools still operate on an agrarian calendar with a huge 12-week break in the middle? I imagine that very few children these days are needed to harvest produce on their family farms. And with the changes in parenting styles and the increasing number of dual-income families, todays children have fewer opportunities to spend their summer days as they might have in the pastshooting hoops or drinking lemonade with buddies in the backyard. Theyre far more likely to be enrolled in pricey extracurricular programs or otherwise spending their days at home alone, watching SpongeBob in their pajamas until noon as they slowly forget their math facts.
A large body of evidence suggests that the 12-week hiatus can have a lasting negative impact on kids educational outcomes. The Summer Slide results in several lost months of reading and math skills, particularly among children who come from lower-income households. Children from affluent families experience similar declines in their math skills, though some research indicates that, thanks to their parents emphasis on summer reading, such students may actually make slight gains in their language-arts skills during the summer months. In other words, the 12-week vacation may exacerbate income-based inequality in school achievement.
But again, that leaves individual families with the burden of figuring out and paying for activities to keep their kids busy during the summer months. Kids with means are often sent to camp or enrichment programs or private summer school. One study estimated that parents spend $16.6 billion total annually on summer activities for their children. According to the same study, parents estimated the cost of summer child careincluding camp, swimming pools, day trips, and babysittingat $433 per child ($642 for affluent families). In my area, the typical six-hour camp costs between $300 to $1000 per week with additional costs for bussing, food, and tips.
A longer school year does not necessarily require traditional classroom programming. In June and July, schools could, say, provide in-depth music, art, and athletic classes with just an hour or two spent on academics. Instruction could be provided by volunteers, parents, or other members of the community. Schools could supplement their budgets with contributions from localities and parents. Attendance could be voluntary to provide flexibility for different family needs. These programs might even create income for a school district, if they attracted tuition-paying children from nearby communities.
There is no question that families need help in the summer. While there isn't the political will to increase the number of traditional classroom days, creative policy-making could provide new options for summer instruction. In the meantime, Im knee deep in beach towels and binders, more than ready for a return to the school routine.
http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2015/09/the-case-for-a-shorter-summer/403531/
While I actually agree with the general sentiment, that long summer vacations are bad for student learning and especially exacerbate the achievement gap because middle class families can afford enriching activities while poor families cannot, I think her argument is rather poor.
It honestly sounds like she wants schools to become a year-round babysitting operation so she won't have to worry or pay for her kids activities.
I also don't think she really understands where the main opposition of this is coming from. It isnt the teachers or funding, but all of the businesses that depend on summer vacationers and summer workers. Perhaps it is different in other places, but summer vacation up at a cabin in middle to northern minnesota is absolutely huge, and it would completely destroy those economies if we moved to a year round school system.
I also disagree that a longer school year is what we need (I think that is just her itching for 'free' baby-sitting), but I would definitely agree that splitting that 3 month long summer vacation into three 1 month long breaks throughout the year would be a whole lot better. That won't happen though because you would run into huge opposition from businesses who depend on summer vacation. Plus, she would also have the same problem that she has now, finding activities for her kids to do and spending money.
Before anyone says that we should have year round schooling, well, good look finding ANY teacher to do that. Teachers have a huge burnout rate as it is, I can't imagine if you had year round schooling with no break, no opportunity to plan lessons, improve teaching, etc. You would basically need to hire a completely separate teaching staff for these months, which would again, just be babysitting.