runnin_blue
Banned
America didn't win that war.
Came to say this.
America didn't win that war.
I really loved Vietcong. A new game like that, man I would so fucking love it
![]()
If you call unified communism a "win".
Lets not forget this was an allied effort at that time to stop the spread of communism. France and other nations were involved well before the USA ever was. The goal was to support the South Vietmanese with hopes they would be able to fight on their own and declare their independance from the communist North, not level the country of Vietnam. Once it became clear that would never happen, America pulled out. No reason to keep fighting for South Nam when they would never be a le to fight for themselves. America nor any country could stay indefinitely, as soon as they left the North would over run the South and that was clear.
back on topic, YES, a Vietnam War era shooter done right would kick ass.
Ok, I think it is much more a technical aspect than anything else:
(besides unpopular, and not won by America)
Not untill recently were developers able to create attractive looking jungles. More often than not the jungle levels in a FPS did NOT feel like a jungle at all, but more like a room with shitty green textures.
Because they had a hard time to make it look believable the games never took off.
Nowaydays they are a lot closer to creating realistic looking jungles. HOWEVER even till this day creating realistic plants and fauna is not achieved regularly. This because, in the end, plants and fauna are living things, and replicating living things is obviously the hardest to do in a video game.
I'd add the love for linear level design to that list. Never does the corridor game design clash more than in a forest setting. It becomes even worse as graphics advance.
A realistic vietnam game would probably go as well as a realistic WWI game. Mostly boring with unfair pot shots and lots of respawning.
I really loved Vietcong. A new game like that, man I would so fucking love it
![]()
gross
Hey everyone let's make a game where you're the Nazis, because that would make for a great game
Yes definitly!
gross
Hey everyone let's make a game where you're the Nazis, because that would make for a great game
gross
Hey everyone let's make a game where you're the Nazis, because that would make for a great game
![]()
There's this game released in 2011 made by Emobi Games, a Vietnamese studio. You play on the Vietnamese side and it cover a part of the Indochina war, from Hanoi 1946 to Dien Bien Phu 54. Might not be the best game ever but the fact that a studio here in Vietnam is able to deliver a big game like this is already a nice achievement.
Trailer:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DEbPhRUXGPw
I really loved Vietcong. A new game like that, man I would so fucking love it
![]()
It's a far more "political" war than WW2 was and, as a consequence of that, It's not as romanticized.
Speaking of which, we already have a god-tier game that needs to be remade:
![]()
![]()
Where can I get this game ?
Also is it in english or at least with subtitles ?
Where can I get this game ?
Also is it in english or at least with subtitles ?
America lost big time. Surely not the numbers game but moral was completely broken. Soldiers didn't want to fight anymore and a lot of officers were killed on purpose by friendly fire because the soldiers didn't want to fight anymore. You can't win a war without soldiers willing to fight.
The COD franchise has been one step away from screaming " AMERICA, FUCK YEAH!" through the screen for a while now.
Anyway, the US didn't win that war, nor were they knights in shining armor. You can't easily romanticize a loss when you're not the good guys. It wasn't like WW2 where they could ignore Russia's major involvement and just claim they saved the world singlehandedly from an obvious, evil threat. Most would rather forget the war altogether, let alone actually make a game about it.
Even if they did, it would become something more along the line of "Spec Ops" and not "Call of 'MURICA vs filthy foreigners" if they were to keep it realistic and that's not what most frat boys would go for. Also, creating the right jungle setting would have been really fucking hard, so most would rather just stick to easier, more conventional settings.
If you want to see more actual gameplay check out this guys YT chan.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZItM3XZ7H4&list=PL4A682524E47F1C7D
I'm sorry but I really don't understand this logic. German and Japanese gamers play WW2 shooters even though their countries lost that war. Should they shun those games as well? As for American gamers, I'm 39 years old, I was born in 1974, I think I'm on the older side of gamers now and Vietnam was already a memory when I was growing up. The idea that younger generations of gamers would shun a game set in that era due to "hurt national pride" seems very odd to me. Yeah, it was a terrible, pointless war but that doesn't mean you have to revel in the atrocities or pretend they didn't happen in order to make a game set during that period. Men of Valor handled it reasonably well, I thought, the soldiers in that game clearly weren't happy to be there and just wanted to make it back home alive.America was humiliated, that's why.
...people having been asking for this for quite a while...and it would make for a unique take on something old.
We can just call it OpFor during the online multiplayer. Nobody will be offended.
Battlefield Vietnam was such a janky pos. But I loved it.
"Gets on scooter, puts Surfin' Bird on full blast, rides around in a broken down city dodging tank fire"
The patriotism is only implied and symbolic, but the point is that its not really satisfying knowing that you're fighting in a war in which your side will never win.
Now playing as a member of the SS would be a different story since they were all quite literally maniacs who had little to no respect for other human life.
Vietnam was a shitty, regrettable war that was full on grey morality in hindsight?
I like to believe RO1/2 are one of the best current examples of war games because it shows both sides as how they are using quotes as well as amazing audio design to show the sheer brutality and the sheer terror of war. The soldiers rather than screaming get some! all the time like in Call of Duty scream out of fear, not because they want to kill but because they're terrified of the situation around them.
The Japanese/American soldiers in Rising Storm even scream about how they don't want to die and they want to see their mothers again. That's how war should be portrayed in the media, as a vile, horrible, complete non solution to a problem.
Well...we prevented Germany from taking over the world...does anyone "win" a war? Many people die, and yes, at times war is a necessary evil, but nobody really "wins" in the end.
Off topic, but can somebody explain to me the connections between Heart of Darkness and Apocalypse Now? I've read HoD, but aside from some names and obvious shout outs ("Exterminate the brutes!"), I didn't see much similarity.
I think that has more to do with being a pretty recent war. Same reason why EA removed Taliban from multiplayer in Medal Of Honor and called them Opposing Force instead. Both those cases caused controvercy.Probably the same reason we won't ever get to play Six Days in Falllujah. It was an unpopular war.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_Days_in_Fallujah
I really loved Vietcong. A new game like that, man I would so fucking love it
![]()
Well...we prevented Germany from taking over the world...
I'm sorry but I really don't understand this logic. German and Japanese gamers play WW2 shooters even though their countries lost that war. Should they shun those games as well? As for American gamers, I'm 39 years old, I was born in 1974, I think I'm on the older side of gamers now and Vietnam was already a memory when I was growing up. The idea that younger generations of gamers would shun a game set in that era due to "hurt national pride" seems very odd to me. Yeah, it was a terrible, pointless war but that doesn't mean you have to revel in the atrocities or pretend they didn't happen in order to make a game set during that period. Men of Valor handled it reasonably well, I thought, the soldiers in that game clearly weren't happy to be there and just wanted to make it back home alive.
America didn't win that war.
So is it your contention that the game devs or publishers themselves would shun the idea of a game set in that era due to their own "hurt national pride?" Because frankly I also find that hard to believe. The generation that fought in that war is now in their 60s or older, I may be quite mistaken but I don't believe there are very many people in that age bracket designing or approving FPS designs.Except it's not about people that play them, but people who make them.