• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Why would Apple want to make an iWatch?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Korey

Member
http://www.theverge.com/2013/2/11/3976406/why-would-apple-want-to-make-an-iwatch

Why would Apple want to make an iWatch?
Signs point to wearables becoming the Next Big Thing

One year ago — almost to the day — the Wall Street Journal broke the news that Apple was testing an 8-inch iPad. In July, just days after Google’s announcement of the Nexus 7, it reiterated that a "smaller" iPad was coming. Those rumors, of course, foretold the launch of the iPad mini late last year.

Yesterday, it was The New York Times’ turn: Apple is now said to be "experimenting" with a "watch-like device," WSJ quickly corroborated the story. These reports, and the timing of them, are almost surely no coincidence; the public relations departments of many companies engage in a dark art, feeding carefully-selected bits of information on unreleased products and initiatives to publications under deep cover in an effort to set the tone, to correct misinformation, and to drive the conversation. It’s a game that Apple is widely understood to play.

As its schizophrenic stock swings in the breeze, Apple wants us — and more importantly, weary investors who are frantically searching for Cupertino’s next iPhone- or iPad-like hit — to know that it’s trying to untap the value in new markets where it doesn’t currently operate. There’s no better place than Wall Street’s newspaper of record to start spreading the news.

But what does Apple really stand to gain from making a wristwatch?

Put simply, evidence is growing that this is the Next Big Thing in consumer tech. "This is going to be a very large market and is developing much faster than most people comprehend," says MetaWatch’s Bill Geiser, a watch industry veteran with a long stint at Fossil on his resume. "I've long believed Apple would launch a smartwatch, so this comes as no surprise."

The blockbuster demand for Pebble’s Bluetooth-connected e-paper smartwatch on Kickstarter is only the latest indication that the watch isn’t dead, that people haven’t given up on strapping something to their wrists in a modern world where every cellphone tells the time — it’s just that the watch is now expected to do more. Nike’s wildly popular FuelBand is another example: it marries the smartwatch with an emerging trend toward personal health analytics and the "quantified self." At Best Buys around the country, you’ll find Jawbone’s Up; it doesn’t have a display, but it’s another example of technology going back onto the wrist after the advent of the time-telling cellphone could’ve killed the watch’s chance for a comeback.

Poor battery life and a lack of comprehensive support in iOS have limited the capabilities of the few smartwatches that have launched so far, including Pebble and Geiser’s MetaWatch. But if anyone has the resources to fix those problems, it’s Apple: the company’s unprecedented $137 billion war chest could go a long way toward new display technologies, chips, and fabrication techniques that make the category more practical for real-world consumers, just as the original iPhone’s capacitive touchscreen made full-touch smartphones livable for the first time. WSJ also reports that Apple’s massive manufacturing partner Foxconn is investigating a number of techniques for making wearable devices more power-efficient, attracting the attention of multiple Foxconn partners.

Arguably, an Apple entry could have the same effect on the industry that the iPod did at its introduction: it could take the smartwatch from a cottage industry, a niche, to an explosive market led by a must-have product.

There’s already evidence in the company’s products that this is happening. The iPod nano, for instance — which attracted so much attention as a makeshift watch that Apple added watch faces to later models — recently morphed into a larger rectangle that’s no longer appropriate for the wrist, possibly making room for a true smartwatch in the lineup. Recent Apple devices have started incorporating support for Bluetooth Low Energy, which sips a fraction of the power of a traditional Bluetooth connection. And iOS 6 added support for Bluetooth’s Message Access Profile (MAP), allowing connected devices to dig into the iPhone’s text messages for the first time. Smartwatch makers have also discovered other rudimentary "hooks" in iOS 6 for notifications that could hint at even better support for smartwatches in future versions. (Whether Apple will keep those hooks to itself or offer it to everyone who wants to make a smartwatch, though, is anyone’s guess.)

While an "iWatch" could be a massively successful product for Apple, Geiser notes that there’s still an opportunity for outsiders to get a piece of the pie. Wristwatches are often considered deeply personal fashion statements — jewelry, even — and that may not play to Apple’s stength: though an iWatch would almost certainly be a beautiful, high-end product, offering dozens of styles isn’t really part of the company’s playbook. "Smart wearables will quickly become functional fashion accessories. Fashion accessories are, by definition, forms of personal expression," he says.

If it's true that Apple is indeed making an iWatch/Pebble type thing, is this a sign that Apple's going downhill? That they have nothing new to bring to the table so they're tapping into this seemingly gimmicky "new" market?

I have a hard time believing smart watches are the "next big thing."
 
dicktracy.jpg
 
Could be a trial balloon for a new product area. I'm sure they could sell many but I don't think it would be a huge new product line for them.
 
a pebble is nice because you can control some aspects of your phone from your wrist. There are a lot of times I can't get to my phone or its bother some to do so. For instance in the winter I rather change music on my watch then unzip my jacket and remove my phone and unlock it then go to the app and put it all back.

When i'm at work or in a meeting its easier to look at my wrist than it is to take out my phone and look at it (also less rude)


Why apple is going into this I have no idea but i'm guessing they need something to bring in more money now that android tablets have hit their ASP hard in the tablet side . Other than moving to a 2 a year product cycle there isn't much more they can do
 
I don't see any harm in marketing a wearable accessory. A more fully fledged device in the size of a watch would be an absolute disaster IMO.
 
I'd buy it. I have a Pebble coming soon. Be nice for apple to tie one into the phone so you could do awesome communicator stuff on it. Siri on my wrist? Awesome.
 
http://www.theverge.com/2013/2/11/3976406/why-would-apple-want-to-make-an-iwatch



If it's true that Apple is indeed making an iWatch/Pebble type thing, is this a sign that Apple's going downhill? That they have nothing new to bring to the table so they're tapping into this seemingly gimmicky "new" market?


I have a hard time believing smart watches are the "next big thing."

What I wouldn't give to re-live the days following the iPhone announcement where everyone was so sure that the gimmicky super expensive smartphone thing was ridiculous and would go nowhere.

Have some imagination man! Im not a fan of smartwatches either, but Im not completely closed to the idea of it being interesting some day. They did just fine with MP3 players, Smartphones and then Tablets. In my eyes that buys them some freaking breathing room on the Smartwatch and SmartTV field. We know they want search, raising a wristwatch to your mouth like James Bond and speaking your search inquiry would completely bypass Google/Bing and whoever else.
 
Calculator watches used to be hot shit if you were a nerd in the 80s. Glad to see apple bringing back this glorious old nerd tech.
 
All I know is that there was a thread on here a while ago regarding watches, and one of the prevailing notions was "I have a phone, what do I need a watch for?" I agreed with this sentiment largely, but I've since bought a watch. Now that I have a watch, bet your ass I never take my phone out to check the time anymore; the watch is miles more convenient.

So ... yeah, I can see this becoming a thing.
 
The ex Apple designer's ideas and solid, and Apple has the capital and resources to make a watch far more useful and interesting than Pebble, whose greatest accomplishment was syncing to your iPhone for texts...

It wouldn't be a gimmick if it was incredibly useful. Fuck, I think the idea of a watch that can make NFC payments is cool enough.
 
What I wouldn't give to re-live the days following the iPhone announcement where everyone was so sure that the gimmicky super expensive smartphone thing was ridiculous and would go nowhere.

Have some imagination man! Im not a fan of smartwatches either, but Im not completely closed to the idea of it being interesting some day. They did just fine with MP3 players, Smartphones and then Tablets. In my eyes that buys them some freaking breathing room on the Smartwatch and SmartTV field. We know they want search, raising a wristwatch to your mouth like James Bond and speaking your search inquiry would completely bypass Google/Bing and whoever else.

iPad was the same thing. lol.
 
Sad to say, I'll probably buy an android interpretation of iWatch, and buy screen protector, extra thick external battery, and a fashionable glossy black frame to go with it.
 
Personally, I don't see it. But it was the same way with the iPad for me. Now I'm typing this message from one. If Apple will build an iWatch I will be super interested in what they'll bring to the table. Small screen will be the biggest hindrance in my book. I'd love to know how they'll get over that hurdle.
 
Don't we already have that?

15_38_13_762_filex6ji8.png

The Nano watch band trend is what supposedly peaked their interest. That plus the success of the Pebble. There's obviously a market for this.

How much of a market, I have no idea. I don't think it really matters. A high margin niche product will do well for Apple, we all should know that.
 
Actually, this will be a huge hit for Apple.

Think about it. Their fans are incredibly status conscious and everyone would see their brand new iWatch and see how rich/trendy/etc they are.
 
I bought a nano and one of those fancy Lunatik watchbands. What I didn't like was having to turn the screen on every time I needed to know the time. It took my longer to find out the time and required both hands.

I bought a pebble (no ship yet) and am excited for the accelerometer use to turn on the screen as I lift my arm.
 
What if you control most of it from your PC/iPhone/iPad and the screen is literally just a clockface/textscreen/music playback? What if most of the "settings" are preset from a greater device and you only use the screen for visual feedback but no interaction? Instead, interaction is solely done through voice and a wireless headset, and many of the things it does aren't dependent on interaction, but instead just through daily use (monitoring heart rate, changing room temperature, NFC payments/ticket admissions, replacing keys, passcodes, etc.).

It could very well just be a mostly passive device and it would still be incredibly useful.

Also, why has no one done an even smaller watch, that is circular? Why is everyone so focused on making it so powerful? Apple could have it be an accompanying device to iPhone and piggyback EVERYTHING.
 
iWatch could become very interesting. Iv seen some like the pebble that have really interested me.

Push my updates to it, make it a pedometer, enable audio play back. a small wire going up your sleeve into your ear is preferable to it being attached to my phone in my pocket for things like cycling.

The thing holding it back is the lack of customization that iOS offers.
 
Technology attached to the user will be an important direction for consumer tech. If you think otherwise, you need to pay more attention.

Watch vs. Glass vs. whatever else, will be quite interesting.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom