• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Wilfred or ITT: Why don't Americans "get" it?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Combichristoffersen said:
According to Jim, Two and a Half Men and Yes, Dear tell you to gently fuck right off.

I dont mind According to Jim, its on at like 6pm or something which seems to be a good time for it. Decent.
 
Jack Scofield said:
American Office, though not funny, is still better than the British version. I can't understand anyone in that show.

Same thing with Shaun of the Dead. I turned it off after about 30 minutes because I couldn't understand anything with their thick accents (and because I hate using subtitles).

What on earth, this blows my mind.
 
ThoseDeafMutes said:
An American once tried to tell me that Americans didn't have an accent, other people did. My mind was blown.
Haha that was going to be my argument, like how there are fuckloads of accents in American shows but I dont have a problem with any of them but eh.
 
ItAintEasyBeinCheesy said:
I dont mind According to Jim, its on at like 6pm or something which seems to be a good time for it. Decent.

It's one of the worst series I've ever seen on TV. Yes, Dear was admittedly worse though.
 
ThoseDeafMutes said:
An American once tried to tell me that Americans didn't have an accent, other people did. My mind was blown.

someone made that argument on here once, i was completely lost for words. what made it worse is that they claimed to have thought about it for more than three seconds
 
ThoseDeafMutes said:
It's ok OP, we all know Australian humor is the best anyway.
Clarke and Dawe are the funniest duo ever.

ThoseDeafMutes said:
An American once tried to tell me that Americans didn't have an accent, other people did. My mind was blown.
My grandmother swore that until the day she died. Her small concession was that there were some American accents, like in the south, but in the NW they certainly didn't have any accent!
 
Dastardly Jerks said:
Actually the problem is the fact that when it becomes Americanised the jokes become TOO obvious. And OH, if you didn't get the joke the first time - don't worry - they'll be repeating the punchline so much til it's drilled in your head.

LOL, exactly this! This is why I cannot watch US sitcoms, you know what the joke is before they even tell it too.
 
chicko1983 said:
never said I cant understand American humour. I love Simpsons, Curb and Seinfeld and quote them more than any other show.

What I cant understand is why American producers think they have to rewrite other countries' tv shows because they think Americans are unwilling to give other types of humour a chance.
Are you being deliberatly dense? Several people have already explained to you cultural differences/references have something to do with it. I'd imagine a lot of other countries don't do it because 1) they don't have the money or it wouldn't make financial sense to attempt produce something close to the quality of the American original and 2) American culture is a bit more ubiquitous than Australian. Sorry if that hurts your patriotic sensiblities.

I'd imagine another reason for the remakes is more control on our behalf. Why re-broadcast an Australian show that is controlled by an Australian company, probably airred years ago so has aging Australian actos and is written by a team of Australians, when you can make your own, hire your own actors, write your own stories (that you can control if the series becomes a hit), and just generally have to worry about a lot less things being out of your control in respect to your show.
 
remember what happened to Kath & Kim? lol...

I have a sneaking suspicion that this is the "talking dog" show that Episodes keeps mocking.
 
devilru said:
remember what happened to Kath & Kim? lol...

I have a sneaking suspicion that this is the "talking dog" show that Episodes keeps mocking.

The Australian version of that show was overrated trash, so nothing of value was lost.
 
You say I wouldn't get the original, but seeing the ads for this one I don't get this either. It looks beyond fucking stupid and something that will be cancelled after 2 or 3 episodes to be honest.
 
Vyer said:
Nah, it's more than just an American thing.

List of British TV shows based on American series


As an aside, because of that list, I had to look this up:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QpsXJeV9E08

Fun house and Supermarket Sweep are American? That's shaken the bedrock of my childhood. Pat Sharp and Dale Winton have a lot to answer for.

I think more than remaking Australian/UK shows for the American market it's remaking the shows for the international market. Living with a couple of guys from India last year they would sit around for a whole Saturday watching U.S sitcoms but didn't understand British ones at all. Apart from the occasional pop culture reference U.S humour is far more accessible for the international audience.

Hopefully we'll never see a U.S version of the Thick of It or Peep Show. They'd have to rip the heart out of both of those shows to make it work for non-UK audiences
 
If they want to remake the shows, fine, but they are missing out.

I watch a lot of US shows like House, Lie to Me, Numbers, Dexter, Castle etc, but in my opinion, because of the length of the series they aren't as compact and consistently good throughout. I find that if a series has 23-24 episodes then there are some really cack episodes in there. The really good British shows have a shorter run and that allows the writers to get in and out with what they want to do without having to fluff things out.

I've watched quite a few US pilots of UK shows and they always lose something that makes the UK series special. For example the US pilot of IT Crowd was horrible. Its not good without Roy and his actor.

Being Human is another one I'm puzzled at.

Ah well.
 
To be fair, a lot of sounds and inflections that are particular to the British accent are 'new' over the past couple of centuries; I've heard it said that King George III would sound more like an American to our modern ears than he'd sound like a current-day posh British man.

THEREFORE THERE'S NO SUCH THING AS AN AMERICAN ACCENT, OR SOMETHING
 
badcrumble said:
To be fair, a lot of sounds and inflections that are particular to the British accent are 'new' over the past couple of centuries; I've heard it said that King George III would sound more like an American to our modern ears than he'd sound like a current-day posh British man.

THEREFORE THERE'S NO SUCH THING AS AN AMERICAN ACCENT, OR SOMETHING

I think there needs to be a differentiation between British (English) accent and Chav.
 
I'll be honest, I wasn't a huge fan of Wilfred. I can see why so many people did enjoy it though. I'm liking the look of the American version so far.
 
Jack Scofield said:
American Office, though not funny, is still better than the British version. I can't understand anyone in that show.

Same thing with Shaun of the Dead. I turned it off after about 30 minutes because I couldn't understand anything with their thick accents (and because I hate using subtitles).


Dude. What the hell. I'm Spanish and my english isn't the greatest on earth but I saw both of them with no problems at all with no subs.
 
Combichristoffersen said:
According to Jim, Two and a Half Men and Yes, Dear tell you to gently fuck right off.

This is a pretty stupid statement. So there aren't 3 bad comedies in the history of anyone else's country?
 
astroturfing said:
someone should do a Finnish remake of Seinfeld.

A show about Järri Säiinifältti observing and commenting on everyone being depressed and suicidal would be a surefire hit

mellowyellowod said:
This is a pretty stupid statement. So there aren't 3 bad comedies in the history of anyone else's country?

Sure there are, but the statement is no less stupid than someone claiming that American humour has been proven to be funny
 
I also have no problem with another country/culture taking a show and remaking it as long as they manage to improve/adapt it properly.
 
Just watched all of FX's teaser shorts on youtube. I think the show looks like it could be pretty good, and FX is a pretty good channel to be on. I don't really mind people remaking shows at all, but I also live in the US. We remake a lot of shows form overseas, whereas those overseas always get all of our crap aired everywhere, so I guess I can understand the hostility a little.

British humor and American humor is just different. I can only get into certain to British comedies (Fawlty Towers being my favorite). I like the Offices about equal. From the US Wilfred clips available vs. the the Australian link in the OP, US one looks funnier to me, but I also dig the vibe of the Aussie one... I think maybe the scenes are just lacking some context, having never seen the show. Definitely going to check this show out this weekend. The actors don't have that nails-on-a-chalkboard Australian accent I can't fucking stand so that's good. What region is their accent associated with? If I ever go to Australia, that's the area I would have to visit.
 
chicko1983 said:
what?!?!

no, I am asking you to watch the Australian one and make up you own mind on what is funny or not

I don't know if you understand the nature of humor, but it is mostly based in common experiences. Why would an American audience find a thoroughly Australian or British show funny? Granted, there may be some common ground, but frankly I think the best of the American Office trumps the British version, mainly because I don't think British humor is especially funny. That's probably because I'm AMERICAN. So I don't see the problem with "Americanizing" a show for, you know, America.
 
why should Americans get it? Tastes differ, doesn't make it right or wrong.

Also, I find the office (UK) almost unwatchable, I don't do that style of 'trainwreck' stuff. And I'm from the UK. So wow, tastes even differ within one country!
 
chicko1983 said:
Yeah maybe I over exaggerated the claim that "everything" is different but the setting and all other actors are different.

In the Australian version, the girl is his new girlfriend and the premise of the story is that the dog doesn't like him cause he wants the girl's affection all to himself. They start out hating each other but gradually become best friends.

In the clip of the American show they have to make Elijah Wood look like he is on drugs and needs a friend so he sees the dog as a man in the suit.

The reason why the main character sees the dog as a dog in a suit is only ever touched upon once in the Australian show to my memory (he thinks he is stressed out). The fact that it is never really expanded on in the Australian show makes it funnier in my opinion.

here is the start of the show to give you a bit more of an idea:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5enxi2kYjU
Great clip! I'm going to have track this show down.

Thank you.
 
The American version doesn't look like he's on drugs, looks like he's about to kill himself and stops only because the neighbour asks him to look after the dog. It's insane but good plot story wise.

There needs to be some differentiation between stories or its just a cut and paste copy.
 
Seems pretty similar to the original concept. Probably has a better setup than the Australian version. Having Woods character at the end of his rope so to say is an interesting place to start.

ItAintEasyBeinCheesy said:
The American version doesn't look like he's on drugs, looks like he's about to kill himself and stops only because the neighbour asks him to look after the dog. It's insane but good plot story wise.

There needs to be some differentiation between stories or its just a cut and paste copy.


Bingo. Its a fantastic setup for a bizarre situation.
 
I remember reading an interview with David Renwick about his attempt at writing a US version of Jonathan Creek. His script was rejected because for 3 minutes it featured an 80yr old man and the network was completely against having an old person on screen, even for just 3 minutes.

Ridiculous.
 
I saw a short film with the same premise close to ten years ago. In it, the man in the dog suit shares a bong load with a guy dating his owner.

It was hilarious.

Now I'm wondering if the short wasn't made by the same people.
 
The difference in productions values are very apparent. Will checkout the American version, the originals gave me a few chuckles but was pretty boring.
 
Shurs said:
I saw a short film with the same premise close to ten years ago. In it, the man in the dog suit shares a bong load with a guy dating his owner.

It was hilarious.

Now I'm wondering if the short wasn't made by the same people.


It was.
 
Why don't Amuricun's "get" it?

Well, Wilfred has:
Thick accents
"Bad" language
Poor video quality
16 total episodes

And The Office has:
Seriously off-putting characters
Unfamiliar cultural references
14 total episodes

Yeah, that might be why American's don't "get" it. It wasn't made for them.

Another reason American studios remake is that the market is large enough that they can afford to remake it. They're also very protective of their own internally developed properties. If another market was large enough that a local studio could afford to both buy the rights and produce the show, I'm sure they would.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom