• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Will the US ever switch to the metric system?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm sure businesses can multiply and divide. It would cost a lot of money for a very small increase in efficiency.

In the short term it would be bad but what about economies of scale and interchangeable foreign parts and such?

I don't know enough about this so I might be/am talking about of my ass.
 
No, they don't. Throughout the many generations of my family still living (my grandparents, parents, my generation, and my cousin's kids), none of us were taught any metric system in school. My cousin's children are 8 and 12 and they haven't been taught any metric stystem at all.
I learned metric in 7th grade back in 97. Arizona is also far from the best educational system around.
 
Putting cost aside, why would we change our road signs? What's the inherent advantage of rest stop X km ahead or speed limit X km/hr? There's no reason to convert to feet or anything else.
 
As long as we keep our Fahrenheit, I don't care. More degrees means more exact temperatures. Because a few degrees does make a difference.

digital-thermometer-pans-2.jpg

.
 
Surely it's only a matter of time. ONLY 3 fucking countries still use the imperial system. stupid ass conservative americans.
 
I'll agree with the rest of the world that the US has it wrong with the imperial system and with the lack of logic that went into it.

But I will not agree that the rest of the world has it right when it comes to the date format. Yes, you can argue that the units are rising in a logical manner when you write 6/10/2012, but I'd much rather have a written system that better reflects how things are said in every day discourse. I don't fucking think of it as "It's the 6th of October, 2012." It's not a bad way to say it, just as it's not bad to say "It's 29 minutes past 4" but saying "It's 4:29" is more efficient.

And seeing as how the date format has a much limited use than systems of measurement which require mathematical patterns and consistency, I don't really get the huff about the way certain parts of the world write the date.
 
One thing I find really annoying about the American system is the opposite use of full stops and commas in maths :(

It's so complicated having to write, for example, ten thousand dollars and fifty cents as
10,000.50 when it should be 10.000,50!
Especially when you're using a TI calculator with American settings.

Also, your numbers after a million don't make sense!
rsDJi.jpg
 
I've recently asked teachers what they prefer, British or American spellings... The typical answer is "whatever" :P

But actually the spelling issue is the opposite of the metric issue. Americans have it right here. Ditch the useless 'U's.

Colour is the official Canadian spelling you heathen.

Also, your numbers after a million don't make sense!
rsDJi.jpg

Ummm, can you explain to me how the European system makes more sense? The English system is a lot more logical from where I'm looking at: a new -illion for every (,000).
 
One thing I find really annoying about the American system is the opposite use of full stops and commas in maths :(

It's so complicated having to write, for example, ten thousand dollars and fifty cents as
10,000.50 when it should be 10.000,50!
Especially when you're using a TI calculator with American settings.

Also, your numbers after a million don't make sense!
rsDJi.jpg

Not when the decimal signifies that it is less than a full dollar just like 0.5m is half of a meter.
 
A poor workaround for a poorly thought-out temperature scale.
Expansion to one decimal space is a poor workaround? A system with "everyday" milestones set around the state changes of water (rather useful as seasonal weather goes) is poorly thought out? You don't even begin to make sense.
 
Colour is the official Canadian spelling you heathen.



Ummm, can you explain to me how the European system makes more sense? The English system is a lot more logical from where I'm looking at: a new -illion for every (,000).

Because Math say so and Math is the thing that makes sense in the universe
Imperial sucks
SI rocks aside for Kelvin
Celsius is the superior way
yyyy/mm/dd is the superior way
dd/mm/yyyy is the lesser evil
mm/dd/yyyy is so fucked up that i can't even think about it
 
Expansion to one decimal space is a poor workaround? A system with "everyday" milestones set around the state changes of water (rather useful as seasonal weather goes) is poorly thought out? You don't even begin to make sense.
It's really not hard to remember the temperature water freezes at in Fahrenheit. I don't get the stink people raise over F when you never have to convert it. The worst part about it is its name.

Also I'm pretty sure the post you're replying to was in jest.
 
I hated this bullshit when I took chemistry and physics tests, knowing all those conversions from american to metric system by memory was nightmare.
 
When I say the date out loud I say "October 6th, 2012". Therefore why wouldn't I write it the same way?

The language is broken, well not the language but how people use it
use "six October" instead of "October sixth" otherwise you should even use 2012th (year since Christ is born)
 
Metric based countries should band together and invade America, impose our system(s) on them, oh and take their oil.
 
Because Math say so and Math is the thing that makes sense in the universe
Imperial sucks
SI rocks aside for Kelvin
Celsius is the superior way
yyyy/mm/dd is the superior way
dd/mm/yyyy is the lesser evil
mm/dd/yyyy is so fucked up that i can't even think about it

Why would you think of things to the base million though? >_> Base thousand makes more sense because we (the Western world) think and write numbers in thousands (,000), so billion is basically the next thousandth after million.

so basically

1 - one
10 - ten
100 - hundren
1,000 - thousand
10,000 - ten thousand
100,000 - hundred thousand
1,000,000 - million
10,000,000 - ten million
100,000,000 - hundred million
1,000,000,000 - billion

etc.

In science, base 10 is the most important base number, followed by the base 1000 (kilo, mega, giga, milli, micro, nano etc.), so it makes more sense to follow the base 1000 numbering.

I agree with everything else you say though lol. All my university, bank and government forms nowadays require yyyy/mm/dd in Canada, but that's because informally people are split between using the American and British system, so confusion happens very frequently.
 
Why would you think of things to the base million though? >_> Base thousand makes more sense because we (the Western world) think and write numbers in thousands (,000), so billion is basically the next thousandth after million.

so basically

1 - one
10 - ten
100 - hundren
1,000 - thousand
10,000 - ten thousand
100,000 - hundred thousand
1,000,000 - million
10,000,000 - ten million
100,000,000 - hundred million
1,000,000,000 - billion

etc.

In science, base 10 is the most important base number, followed by the base 1000 (kilo, mega, giga, milli, micro, nano etc.), so it makes more sense to follow the base 1000 numbering.
even if it would be wrong to use the short system because a Billion is 10 to the power of 9 or 1000 to the power of 3 and the Bi=2 is nowhere to be found
 
even if it would be wrong to use the short system because a Billion is 10 to the power of 9 or 1000 to the power of 3 and the Bi=2 is nowhere to be found

Well milli usually means 10 to the -3 so this goes both ways :P Ignoring the "bi", billion masically means the next thousandth after a million.
 
It's Independence Day. "4th of July" is the slang term used for it.

Whatever it is, it is used and understood to mean the fourth day of July of that year. Now you just need to start using that order for the less culturally important dates.
 
Temperature stuff is actually not that important but still Celcius is superior because it is connected with pure water. At below 0C temperature there are many changes to real life and 0C is very important in day to day life. Roads are dangerous, snow may fall and generally it's mayor change how people live.

You have to post the picture dude.


ER5vL.png

Also 0 to 100C is wrong scale. It's something like -60 to 60 depending where you live. -30 really cold +30 very hot. That is the normal way of using C based temperature.

As for metric vs imperial system it's not even debatable. SI generally aside from C/F/K stuff is superior way. It's more logical and it's way easier. Using imperial system is like using roman numbers. It's understandable but in serious work it just don't work as good as SI.

Implementing system is another debate. Mainly cost.

And every body is wrong on date. It should be 2012/10/06 and there is no law that abide you to say in proper reading order
 
100 F is just starting to get a decent sweat on where I'm from and 0 F is dead, given the amount of warm weather clothing I don't have.
 
Temperature stuff is actually not that important but still Celcius is superior because it is connected with pure water. At below 0C temperature there are many changes to real life and 0C is very important in day to day life. Roads are dangerous, snow may fall and generally it's mayor change how people live.

I can see a case for the freezing point being zero (though in practice you rarely do have pure water), but basing 100 for the boiling point is silly.

Fahrenheit was devised to be a practical system for everyday life.

Is it good for science? No, not really. But neither is Celsius, you have to convert to Kelvin. So you have an awkward scale adopted mostly due to peer pressure.
 
I would like America to switch mostly to metric. Everything but temp should be metric since fahrenheit makes so much more sense then celsius. It makes no sense to me that 30° celsius is like 80° fahrenheit.
 
I can see a case for the freezing point being zero (though in practice you rarely do have pure water), but basing 100 for the boiling point is silly.

Fahrenheit was devised to be a practical system for everyday life.

Is it good for science? No, not really. But neither is Celsius, you have to convert to Kelvin. So you have an awkward scale adopted mostly due to peer pressure.

If 100 wasn't the boiling point of water then what should it be? Surely not a number as random as 212F. The advantage of Celsius is that is scales linearly with Kelvin (just add 273), which still makes Celsius metric, even though it isn't SI, AND it's useful for daily life (-30C to +30C is the range of temperatures for where I live, and it's 0C to 50C in most deserts).
 
I can see a case for the freezing point being zero (though in practice you rarely do have pure water), but basing 100 for the boiling point is silly.

Fahrenheit was devised to be a practical system for everyday life.

Is it good for science? No, not really. But neither is Celsius, you have to convert to Kelvin. So you have an awkward scale adopted mostly due to peer pressure.
It's defined using the freezing/boiling point of water because it's easy to reproduce, just like a gram is defined as one cubic centimetre of water, and a kilogram is defined as 1000 cubic centimetres (or one litre) of water.
 
I can see a case for the freezing point being zero (though in practice you rarely do have pure water), but basing 100 for the boiling point is silly.

Fahrenheit was devised to be a practical system for everyday life.

Is it good for science? No, not really. But neither is Celsius, you have to convert to Kelvin. So you have an awkward scale adopted mostly due to peer pressure.

Celcius is not based on temperature of boiling water it's based on freezing temperature of water. Also no one scales 0 to 100 or -100 to 100. As i said it's mostly scaled to temperature achievable in area in which you use thermometer. So my has something like -50 to 50. In Russia it will be like -60 to 60.

edit:

which give you two extremes like F system and water freezing moment which is most important moment in day to day life.
 
I can see a case for the freezing point being zero (though in practice you rarely do have pure water), but basing 100 for the boiling point is silly.

Fahrenheit was devised to be a practical system for everyday life.

Is it good for science? No, not really. But neither is Celsius, you have to convert to Kelvin. So you have an awkward scale adopted mostly due to peer pressure.

I don't understand this sentiment. Any scale is fine once you know what it is. The only concern about a scale for everyday life is that each degree of difference should be meaningful.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom