Alien Bob said:all that's left is for Ben Stiller to play a baby Picard
Man that's some George Lucas shit right there. Take it back! :lol
Alien Bob said:all that's left is for Ben Stiller to play a baby Picard
Busty said:JJ Abrams is making this, believe it or not, an alternate universe Trek. Alot of things aren't going to be the same.
Apparently Spock (played by Zachary Quinto from Heroes) will be one of the few remaining Vulcans after their planet is destroyed by the Romulans. Also Spock will have emotions....
Make of that what you will.
Yeah, by TNG Spock's mom had died and Sarek had remarried to another human.Napoleonthechimp said:And look how well that turned out.
Anyway, wasn't spock's mother alive during the TNG era? That would make her really old... None of this makes any sense.
EDIT: Or was that a different wife? ...
SomeDude said:watching star trek is like watching paint dry.
DrForester said:He's already been in star trek
SomeDude said:watching star trek is like watching paint dry.
Man, you could get killed for saying something like that...SomeDude said:watching star trek is like watching paint dry.
SomeDude said:watching star trek is like watching paint dry.
Stoney Mason said:Source?
Not that long, I think they only lived to be about 100 or so. Isn't Spock like 300 or so during NG?Ignatz Mouse said:I think humans live a really, really long time in Trek.
His purpose isn't to be completely emotionless, but to attempt to be emotionless.Kak.efes said:Why would they want to give Spock emotions? It defeats the purpose of his character.
Systems_id said:Not that long, I think they only lived to be about 100 or so. Isn't Spock like 300 or so during NG?
Edit: Beaten.
JoshuaJSlone said:His purpose isn't to be completely emotionless, but to attempt to be emotionless.
DrForester said:Spock has emotions.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XC73PHdQX04
WARNING: Once you watch it, you can not un-watch it
I didn't look at it quite as a Kirk/Spock duality. More like McCoy and Spock were the angel and the devil presenting opposite views over each shoulder.Kak.efes said:His purpose within the narrative is to be a counter-point to Kirk's impulsive and irrational behavior. An emotional Spock could ruin the interplay between two of the most important characters.
It's that conflicting, and enduring friendship which made original trek so great.
:lol:lol :lolDrForester said:Spock has emotions.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XC73PHdQX04
WARNING: Once you watch it, you can not un-watch it
Okay. Thread saved.Frenck said:Some new plot details:
- Romulans from the future find and use the Guardian of Forever (address: City on the Edge of Forever) to go back in time to kill the ruinous Romulan nemesis, James Tiberius Kirk.
- Old Spock (Leonard Nimoy) then travels back through time to warn Young Spock (Zach Quinto) of the plot to kill Kirk.
- When the two Spocks first meet, it is before Young Spock has met Young Kirk (Christopher Pine).
- When we first meet Young Kirk, he is dealing with Starfleets no-win Kobayashi Maru test.
Great stuff. That's how you do a prequel.
twinturbo2 said:Okay. Thread saved.
When Kirk takes the Kobayashi Maru test, should he cheat on it, like he did in series canon?
twinturbo2 said:Okay. Thread saved.
When Kirk takes the Kobayashi Maru test, should he cheat on it, like he did in series canon?
twinturbo2 said:Okay. Thread saved.
When Kirk takes the Kobayashi Maru test, should he cheat on it, like he did in series canon?
Frenck said:Some new plot details:
- Romulans from the future find and use the Guardian of Forever (address: City on the Edge of Forever) to go back in time to kill the ruinous Romulan nemesis, James Tiberius Kirk.
- Old Spock (Leonard Nimoy) then travels back through time to warn Young Spock (Zach Quinto) of the plot to kill Kirk.
- When the two Spocks first meet, it is before Young Spock has met Young Kirk (Christopher Pine).
- When we first meet Young Kirk, he is dealing with Starfleets no-win Kobayashi Maru test.
Great stuff. That's how you do a prequel.
Well, if he changed the conditions, how isn't that cheating?DrForester said:He didn't cheat. He changed the conditions of the test. Got a commendation for original thinking.
twinturbo2 said:Well, if he changed the conditions, how isn't that cheating?
Touche.DrForester said:Kirk's logic was that making the situation "no win" was cheating.