• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Wired analyzes the Battle of Hoth, rips Vader's approach

Status
Not open for further replies.
The article suggests TIE Fighters in Hoth atmosphere. I doubt they were equipped for that sort of environment. They don't even have hyperdrive systems.
 
What would a hyberdrive system have to do with a TIE Fighter's ability to enter that atmosphere?

I'm just saying they are ultra-light ships, equipped for short-range space skirmishes. Truly the basic infantry of the Empire's arsenal. They have no shields or life support systems either. And Hoth has an extremely unforgiving atmosphere and plenty of Rebel ground defense.
 
I'm just saying they are ultra-light ships, equipped for short-range space skirmishes. Truly the basic infantry of the Empire's arsenal. They have no shields or life support systems either. And Hoth has an extremely unforgiving atmosphere and plenty of Rebel ground defense.

They have pilots and fly in space but have no life support systems? Oh ok.
 
I believe there are various canon examples of TIEs being able to operate in atmosphere. I just can't find any right now.
 
If I'm not mistaken, aren't the TIE pilot suits/rebreathers functioning as their life support? Honest question

Could be. Wouldn't be a reason they couldn't fly on Hoth though. Everyone is looking past the most obvious answer. They are a sphere with two vertical wings. The things would fall out of the sky. They would generation zero lift to be able to fly in an atmosphere. Of course that doesn't really matter in the star wars universe. X-Wings wouldn't be able to fly either.
 
The TIE fighter pilot wears a suit that handles all life support. It's not actually part of the ship. The empire did this so that the fighter itself could sustain some systems damage and not kill the pilot.

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/TIE_pilot

Good to know I guess. My point was if a TIE fighter can fly in space it obviously can support human life so not having a life support system wouldn't be a reason why it can't fly on Hoth.
 
Could be. Wouldn't be a reason they couldn't fly on Hoth though. Everyone is looking past the most obvious answer. They are a sphere with two vertical wings. The things would fall out of the sky. They would generation zero lift to be able to fly in an atmosphere. Of course that doesn't really matter in the star wars universe. X-Wings wouldn't be able to fly either.

damnit, in the Rogue Squadron games they're all flying around in atmospheres
 
I'm just saying they are ultra-light ships, equipped for short-range space skirmishes. Truly the basic infantry of the Empire's arsenal. They have no shields or life support systems either. And Hoth has an extremely unforgiving atmosphere and plenty of Rebel ground defense.

I'll grant you that they aren't the sturdiest of ships and their form-factor doesn't probably make them all that maneuverable inside an atmosphere, but there is nothing to indicate that they couldn't enter one if they wanted to. Hell, what would be the point of a TIE Bomber if they couldn't enter an atmosphere? They couldn't have been designed just on the off chance they'd need to bombard astroids for missing Corellian Freighters.

And Hoth's atmosphere is harsh and cold, but if a TIE can survive in the cold of space, it certainly could inside the planet's atmosphere too. Hoth isn't that much different than visiting the North or South Pole on Earth, which I wouldn't think would be an issue.
 
Neither is Admiral Ackbar.

No one in Star Wars lives up to the hype. It's as if they're all incompetent boobs.

Oh, no you didn't!

Even the ace pilot Wedge Antilles?

anh_wedge6.jpg

Phew. Matt C to the rescue.
 
The article suggests TIE Fighters in Hoth atmosphere. I doubt they were equipped for that sort of environment. They don't even have hyperdrive systems.

The reasons why Ties were not used was because of the defense shield. Remember the rebels had to lower it to let their ships through. The shields prevented the use of fighter craft as it created a ceiling that constricted their flight room and entrance. This is also why the rebels used low flying ground speeders for combat instead of all those X-Wings they had parked at the base which had superior firepower including torpedoes that would have eaten those AT ATs for lunch. Fighter craft or anything with repulsorlifts can not penetrate shielding, that is why walkers and ground troops used, as they can penetrate shields.

Once the ground forces took down the shields they told vader they could land their shuttles for the reinforcements.

Good lord!

Yeah, the Extended Universe is filled with stupidity.

It's a joke, the Imperium class is not real. Not really any dumber than a Death Star still though.
 
The reasons why Ties were not used was because of the defense shield. Remember the rebels had to lower it to let their ships through. The shields prevented the use of fighter craft as it created a ceiling that constricted their flight room and entrance. This is also why the rebels used low flying ground speeders for combat instead of all those X-Wings they had parked at the base which had superior firepower including torpedoes that would have eaten those AT ATs for lunch. Fighter craft or anything with repulsorlifts can not penetrate shielding, that is why walkers and ground troops used, as they can penetrate shields.

Once the ground forces took down the shields they told vader they could land their shuttles for the reinforcements.

Wait, how did they get the transports through then?
 
Wait, how did they get the transports through then?

The rebel transports? In the movie they lowered the shield for a brief moment when they fired the ion cannons. Leia even makes mention of it in the movie.

Walkers are popular because they work as assault vehicles in star wars. For example the trade federation tanks in Ep1 couldn't penetrate the gungan defense shield as they were repulsor operated and not walker or treaded vehicles. So walkers and such are used as a way to get past enemy defensive shielded positions.
 
The rebel transports? In the movie they lowered the shield for a brief moment when they fired the ion cannons. Leia even makes mention of it in the movie.

Walkers are popular because they work as assault vehicles in star wars. For example the trade federation tanks in Ep1 couldn't penetrate the gungan defense shield as they were repulsor operated and not walker or treaded vehicles. So walkers and such are used as a way to get past enemy defensive shielded positions.

No, the Imps.
 
No, the Imps.

What transports are you talking of? If you mean the troops and walkers, they landed outside the shield. The article is wrong in making it sound like it was a planetary shield, in the movie they state the shield was around an area of the planet. The Imperial troops landed outside the shield area and used their walkers to assault the base. When the walkers destroyed the shields the commander tells Lord Vader that his troops can land.
 
Good to know I guess. My point was if a TIE fighter can fly in space it obviously can support human life so not having a life support system wouldn't be a reason why it can't fly on Hoth.

Fair point, but the collateral damage of the Empire's assault from employing TIE Bombers/Fighters could potentially place the life of Luke in danger. As stated earlier in the thread, the Battle of Hoth's main story focus was Vader's using it as a smokescreen to attempt to abduct and turn Luke.

No love for Porkins?

He dead
 
Only Vader can’t bombard the base: He’s in it. For reasons that never get explained — and can’t be justified militarily — Vader joins the Stormtrooper assault on the base. So much for his major weapon against the Rebels, and the primary reason for ordering the Walkers to invade and destroy the generator. Once Vader opts to bring down the shield and lead the invasion, he’s lost the battle.

I always felt Vader was going in to look for Luke, not destroy the Rebels. Sure he was told to crush the rebels, but that was a secondary goal in this battle. He wanted to capture and turn Luke. Was Leia a secondary target as well? Also, did Vader know that was is daughter in the first movie whe he had her captive?
 
Maybe it never gets explained because it's completely self-evident given Vader's stated motivation before the battle: He's looking for Luke Skywalker, and he wants him alive. When Skywalker is clearly missing, Vader goes after the next best thing, the Princess, whom he knows shares a bond with Skywalker due to his rescuing her from the Death Star, as well as being a valuable hostage.

The fact that the author did not seem to realize Vader's actual objective makes the entire article pretty weak. Vader never intended to bombard the base from orbit, because that could kill Luke. Ozzel was ordered to come out of hyperspace when he did, and Vader then killed him to cover it up, specifically because Vader's strategy was completely unorthodox for the assault. Why? Because Vader wasn't trying to crush the Rebellion, he was trying to capture Luke so he could overthrow the Emperor (as shown in his speech to Luke at the end of the film), but obviously the troops under his command couldn't be allowed to know that.

Hoth was not a military blunder, it was Vader executing his secret plan to usurp power and using his fearsome reputation and ruthlessness as tools to prevent his strange decisions from being questioned. He's less opaque when it comes to hiring the bounty hunters and occupying Bespin, because at that point the Emperor has essentially okayed the plan to capture Luke alive and turn him to the Dark Side.


That actually explains why Vader was so quick to kill Ozzel but continues to tolerate Admiral Piett's continued incompentence. It seems the only competent officer in Vader's fleet is General Veers, since he's the only who ever succeeds in accomplishing his orders.
 
That actually explains why Vader was so quick to kill Ozzel but continues to tolerate Admiral Piett's continued incompentence. It seems the only competent officer in Vader's fleet is General Veers, since he's the only who ever succeeds in accomplishing his orders.

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Maximilian_Veers

In the 2006 video game Star Wars: Empire at War it is stated by Grand Moff Tarkin that Veers designed the AT-AT personally.

Good at following orders...terrible engineer.
 
Vehicles with legs never make any sense in a universe where hover technology exists.

But they look kinda cool.

But if they hadn't used walkers they wouldn't have had that tripping problem. Actually, all their problems with walking vehicles wouldn't have existed.
 
Vehicles with legs never make any sense in a universe where hover technology exists.

But they look kinda cool.

But if they hadn't used walkers they wouldn't have had that tripping problem. Actually, all their problems with walking vehicles wouldn't have existed.

Hover vehicles are not good as they are more vulnerable. They can't penetrate defensive shielding and they are left open to ion attacks. Walkers are more popular for assault purposes, but yea it would make more sense for them to use wheeled or tracked vehicles, though they might not have worked well in the snow, hence the use of walkers.
 
Hover vehicles are not good as they are more vulnerable. They can't penetrate defensive shielding and they are left open to ion attacks. Walkers are more popular for assault purposes, but yea it would make more sense for them to use wheeled or tracked vehicles, though they might not have worked well in the snow, hence the use of walkers.
I don't see how though. Anything that's put in a Walker can be put in a hover tank. There's nothing that a Walker has that a hover tank couldn't also have except slow trip-prone legs. And I'm pretty sure tracked vehicles are made to drive in snow.

I'm sure they used them to look cool and have fun with stop motion.
 
Hover vehicles are not good as they are more vulnerable. They can't penetrate defensive shielding and they are left open to ion attacks. Walkers are more popular for assault purposes, but yea it would make more sense for them to use wheeled or tracked vehicles, though they might not have worked well in the snow, hence the use of walkers.

Thus the name of the vehicle which is All Terrain Armored Transport.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom