kyliethicc
Member
Last edited:
Yup. Was interesting how he said the devs all said 8 cores was good enough tho, if 16 cores meant a smaller GPU.so a 16 core CPU was on the cards , nice video
Seem's like a bite sized and revised version of the Road to PS5.
It's also interesting to note how Mark Cerny constantly stressed that the PS5's hardware specifications were born from the needs of game developers, especially Tim Sweeney who heavily pushed for an SSD implementation.
Also curious timing from Sony to release this now, hopefully this opens the door to more talks and interviews focused on in-depth discussions surrounding the development of the PS5. Similar to what we had with the PS4.
EDIT: Also might have just been me but it felt like he was deliberately holding back on discussing the technical details of the GPU.
I'd gladly pay far more for a PS5 Pro. Problem is, i'm not sure how much of the market I represent.I've always had a sneaky suspicion since the reveal of the specs that Sony understimated Microsoft when it came to the GPU & CPU.
They probably wanted to release a slightly lower clocked CPU and less teraflops GPU.
The thing is... I don't think it would have really mattered. Sony would still continue to dominate but Microsoft would definitely begin to get much closer to Sony than they did last gen.
Either way and from what I've seen, I don't think people would mind paying more $$$ for a better specs console ( PS5 Pro in 2023?)
get that weed ready.
Its not that ps5 gpu is big, maybe they forgot cpu is 8 not 16 cores :dYup. Was interesting how he said the devs all said 8 cores was good enough tho, if 16 cores meant a smaller GPU.
*no green rats were harmed in the making*
What is with this stupid take? I thought these would die down once the consoles were actually released.I've always had a sneaky suspicion since the reveal of the specs that Sony understimated Microsoft when it came to the GPU & CPU.
Video was slated for 2020, COVID delay.Cerny is a genius, yes, and the PS5 a greatly designed piece of hardware...But why are we still discussing the genesis of the system 12 months into this generation?
I get the opposite impression. MS went with 4 and 12 tflops as a sandwich strategy thinking the PS5 was going to be 8 tflops and $399.I've always had a sneaky suspicion since the reveal of the specs that Sony understimated Microsoft when it came to the GPU & CPU.
We are not worthy.He even directed Knack.
Maybe they were.I get the opposite impression. MS went with 4 and 12 tflops as a sandwich strategy thinking the PS5 was going to be 8 tflops and $399.
But they didn't.Maybe they were.
They probably thought they would be using Jaguar like coresOut of curiosity, I'd like to know who those devs are that asked for 16 core CPU.
Cerny is a genius, yes, and the PS5 a greatly designed piece of hardware...But why are we still discussing the genesis of the system 12 months into this generation?
On RDNA 2.0? Nah. They shouldve known what AMD was targeting with RDNA 2.0. The 32 CU 6600xt hits up to 2.75 Ghz. They targeted 2.2 on purpose to fit it into the console thermal budget. This thing pulls just as many watts as the PS3 and similar to the XSX so it's not like they went super saiyan trying to match XSX in a desperate hail marry attempt.Maybe they were.
Playing CoD right now and I am just not feeling the 3d audio. I loved it in returnal but almost no one is using it to its fullest potential. I dont recall Ratchet or RE8 being as effective either. Maybe ive just forgotten but i supposed that just means it wasnt too memorable.Dedicated 3D Audio unit in main custom chip. Tempest 3D Audio.