www.gameinformer.com
I think 5e started out strong, but around the time Tasha's Cauldron came out their priorities changed.
Why do you think that's even a man?
Nah, it's composed for shit. Look at the "bubble" around the clerics (?) mace thing. It goes BEHIND her orange hair and arm, as if it were a disc instead of a sphere. Then the caster is holding a thin staff that somehow is behind her cloak? And I guess she is levitating? The ranger lady is either doing a power squat with her butt right up against the knight or her back left leg is invisible. Plus her left arm is somehow resting ABOVE her boobs but her left hand is still in front of her right elbow, it's a very awkward positioning meant to highlight that yes, this is a female because while she doesn't have actual boob armor she somehow has a skin tight suit of studded leather that hugs her waist and displays her small bosom.
I think they go by "latine" now.
These are all FAR better than that cover. And where is my bae Sheila? Hood on, I guess.How many of you didn’t bother to look beyond the front cover?
Last image has a few familiar characters from the 80s cartoon. I have a disdain for WotC given their greedy antics, but there is nothing wrong here at all with the art. Lot of ”look at this bitch eating crackers” spitefulness going on.
Maybe i just have bad taste, but you did not think about that before starting your rant.
TIL that Dungeons and Dragons has Rabbit people in it.
Oh, you know they courting that furry demographic!
I checked, it's Tyler Jacobson, who has done a lot of the cover art for various DnD books (including the first 5e TPH and DMG). He is capable of a much better command of anatomy, scene presentation, and conveying emotion and purpose than this.
How many of you didn’t bother to look beyond the front cover?
Last image has a few familiar characters from the 80s cartoon. I have a disdain for WotC given their greedy antics, but there is nothing wrong here at all with the art. Lot of ”look at this bitch eating crackers” spitefulness going on.
I'm finally getting represented as the vase with the long purple tongue!
Last image has a few familiar characters from the 80s cartoon. I have a disdain for WotC given their greedy antics, but there is nothing wrong here at all with the art. Lot of ”look at this bitch eating crackers” spitefulness going on.
I really love AD&D's aesthetic. So much so when I wrote an adventure, I borrowed from it.Not great looking. Not terrible, but not a fan of that messy pastelly kind of look. Also, is that a Chinese Halfling? lolol
Way back in the 80s, my older bros bought thos classic D&D box sets. Funny thing is they never played them as it was too complicated, we all preferred video games and traditional board games, but some reason they were still bought due to sheer coolness. I think they just wanted a collection. I was too young to play, but they and their friends probably tired them a handful of times and gave up.
I always thought the aqua coloured companion set looked awesome.
My bros also bought a Monster Manual. Googling it, it was the first one.
Take care.
Same. Its Ageless.
That's all Larry Elmore stuff, one of the TITANS of fantasy art. Super nice guy, met him a few times at cons. His arts books are well worth it.Not great looking. Not terrible, but not a fan of that messy pastelly kind of look. Also, is that a Chinese Halfling? lolol
Way back in the 80s, my older bros bought thos classic D&D box sets. Funny thing is they never played them as it was too complicated, we all preferred video games and traditional board games, but some reason they were still bought due to sheer coolness. I think they just wanted a collection. I was too young to play, but they and their friends probably tired them a handful of times and gave up.
I always thought the aqua coloured companion set looked awesome.
www.wargamer.com
Damn, Venger though!New Dungeon Master's Guide cover art is out. I'm not a fan of this one. Looks cheap.
Holy shit, I didn't even realize that was Venger. They're really going all in on DND cartoon nostalgia these days, huh.
