• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Woman sues because she thought crunchberries were real berries

Status
Not open for further replies.
OuterWorldVoice said:
I once, when new to the US, asked the coffee shop for a "Booberry Muffin" because my girflfriend had asked for said using an infantile voice.

"Boobery mufffin please."

"Boo-berry?"

"Yes, boo-berry."

A Boo-berry muffin would be pretty good.

boo-berry-cereal-box-11.jpg
 
BladeWorker said:
I wonder if she's related to the woman who sued McDonald's because the coffee was too hot.

You think this means this crunchberry woman actually has a case? That the slander campaign from a multi wont succeed other than in the minds of the general public?

Not so sure about that.
 
OuterWorldVoice said:
I once, when new to the US, asked the coffee shop for a "Booberry Muffin" because my girflfriend had asked for said using an infantile voice.

"Boobery mufffin please."

"Boo-berry?"

"Yes, boo-berry."
wtf :lol
 
Ferrio said:
I always wondered what the story was behind those types of cereals. Did they like have too much of a certain ingredient and needed to burn through it quickly?

My wife works in retail marketing. I think it's probably one of the following:

Experiment to see what the market thinks of the product
Short-term manipulation of sales numbers/shelf space
 
Sai-kun said:
:lol :lol Real froot? I wonder what froot looks/tastes like! :lol


Oh my! In my 21 years of looking at that box I just now realized its Froot! Ahahahaha.

jumps of a high place
 
DiatribeEQ said:
Boo-Berry freaking ROCKED as a kid. Too many assholes loved Count Chocula at my house & friends houses :(


I'd kill for a bowl of this stuff, and a can of o.k. soda afterward


2he8p4l.jpg
 
Trakdown said:
Wait till she finds out about dingleberries.

:lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol

A+
 
BladeWorker said:
I wonder if she's related to the woman who sued McDonald's because the coffee was too hot.
That woman had third degree burns. She was hospitalized for over a week undergoing skin grafts on her groin, and had to go to therapy for several years afterward.
 
Monroeski said:
That woman had third degree burns. She was hospitalized for over a week undergoing skin grafts on her groin, and had to go to therapy for several years afterward.

And she attempted to settle for her medical costs alone ($20,000) before being refused and taking them to court. And they knew the coffee was too hot and had hundreds of incidents on file. And the coffee was about 190 degrees, which is about 40-50 over normal serving temperature for even hot coffee.

I hate how the media sensationalizes all of these cases to get ratings, and then people have all the wrong ideas.
 
BladeWorker said:
I wonder if she's related to the woman who sued McDonald's because the coffee was too hot.

You know, that woman recieved third degree burns, right? Coffee is not supposed to be hot enough to seperate your skin from the underlyng tissue.

She also originally only sought enough money from McDonalds to cover her hospital bills, and only upped it when they started refusing and giving her the run around.
 
DiatribeEQ said:
This is why I am a big supporter for mandatory sterilization for stupid people. Note that I didn't say retarded people, but STUPID people. Folks that are of normal mental faculties, but do so many things that defy logic in terms of how DUMB they are. As a result, they need not be allowed to breed & produce offspring to carry on this powerful legacy of what ole Mom and/or Dad has started.

Second.
 
intelligence isn't purely hereditary, guys

sounds like you may end up being candidates for your own program...
 
Ignatz Mouse said:
And she attempted to settle for her medical costs alone ($20,000) before being refused and taking them to court. And they knew the coffee was too hot and had hundreds of incidents on file. And the coffee was about 190 degrees, which is about 40-50 over normal serving temperature for even hot coffee.

I hate how the media sensationalizes all of these cases to get ratings, and then people have all the wrong ideas.
The McDonald's Spilled Coffee case has gone around so many times it hard to tell fact from urban legend.

A) McDonald's offered her $800 for her medical costs after she asked for $11,000, and when her costs rose to $20,000 she hired a lawyer. Both parties then went to a mediator who recommended a $225,000 settlement. McDonald's balked and the case went to trial.

B) The hundreds of complaints (~700) were in aggregate across all of McDonald's (tens of thousands of locations worldwide) over a ten year period.

C) The plaintiff claimed the coffee was between only 165 and 170 degrees, a temperature which is within industry standards. In fact, McMahon v Bunn-O-Matic specifically held that 179 degree coffee is not “unreasonably dangerous.”
 
Jbird34 said:
Disbar him for what? Throwing another stupid case by a mentally challenged person out of court?


The law firm/lawyers bringing the lawsuits. The lady was probably just paid by the firm to be the plaintiff
 
I say if a law firm or independent attorney brings a suit to court and loses or it is dismissed with prejudice, the firm should have to pay a fine. Put a monetary stake in determining the case's worth BEFORE it sees a judge.
 
keeblerdrow said:
I say if a law firm or independent attorney brings a suit to court and loses or it is dismissed with prejudice, the firm should have to pay a fine. Put a monetary stake in determining the case's worth BEFORE it sees a judge.

it'd be nice, the problem, though, is that once you start putting up these kinds of barriers, you'll inevitably end up prevent some LEGITIMATE cases from being brought to trial.



Also, the lawyers would ust increase their fees to cover this, so it wouldn't effect them anyway.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom