• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Wonder Woman Trailer #2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Because it's just 2 seconds in a 165 minutes long movie. If it wasn't for GAF posting that gif, I would have never even noticed the awkward "suddenly, I'm dead" reaction.

I noticed it when I saw it, everyone did, how is that something someone doesn't notice?

It's not like it's one of those gifs where they slow-mo something that you're only supposed to see for a split second.

[edit]

Couple of posts aboves our, someone said that both times they saw the movie in the theater, people laughed when it happened. This is not something that is known because of a gif, the gif exists because people think that death is ridiculous.
 
K9CtqIf.png


Who thinks of this when going into battle?

This is clearly the face she should've gone with


5cA0ioA.gif
 
Because it's just 2 seconds in a 165 minutes long movie. If it wasn't for GAF posting that gif, I would have never even noticed the awkward "suddenly, I'm dead" reaction.

Me and nearly everyone in my theatre burst out laughing. She was even asked about it in a interview. Its hilarious. How Nolan let that go is beyond me.
 
After doing Inception I don't think Nolan had any more love left over for the Batman franchise. The Dark Knight Rises was a mess.
 
If a movie doesn't work as well as its predecessors, it's not because the filmmaker didn't give a fuck. People pull this shit with Spider-Man 3, too. "It was so bad, but Raimi clearly sabotaged it because he was upset with Sony, he just didn't care anymore and deliberately made it bad!" No, he worked his ass off; the movie just didn't work. I don't think TDKR is anywhere near SM3 in quantity or quality of flaws, but neither of their issues are a result of "the director stopped caring." You didn't like the decisions they made or the end result of those decisions; that's not because the directors didn't give a shit anymore. There are much lazier ways to make a movie than TDKR.

If anything, I think that movie's problem is the total opposite: not that Nolan had nothing left to say, but that he had too many ideas he wanted to cram into his last outing, and not all of it flowed together especially well.
 
I want to be excited for this movie, but I can't help but be super uneasy about it. The premise and setting seem like they could be really interesting, but it's DC so yeah. I even liked MoS for the most part but after BvS and SS I have little faith.

I don't love Gadot, but I don't dislike her either. They could have done a lot better and they could have done a lot lot worse. I very much doubt her performance and portrayal of WW will be the biggest issue this movie has to overcome and if it is we'll at last have a competent DC movie for once.
 
TDKR features around 24 minutes of actual Batman footage. Like dude in a Batman suit doing Batman shit... 24 minutes. During the entire runtime. I kept track. That movie is a MESS.

I know people like to say TDKR isn't very good because of its story and what not, but you think it's a mess because it only features 24m of Batman? Seriously!

The film is more about Bruce than it is Batman, and actually, that's what I like about the film, most of all personally.
 
If a movie doesn't work as well as its predecessors, it's not because the filmmaker didn't give a fuck. People pull this shit with Spider-Man 3, too. "It was so bad, but Raimi clearly sabotaged it because he was upset with Sony, he just didn't care anymore and deliberately made it bad!" No, he worked his ass off; the movie just didn't work. I don't think TDKR is anywhere near SM3 in quantity or quality of flaws, but neither of their issues are a result of "the director stopped caring." You didn't like the decisions they made or the end result of those decisions; that's not because the directors didn't give a shit anymore. There are much lazier ways to make a movie than TDKR.

If anything, I think that movie's problem is the total opposite: not that Nolan had nothing left to say, but that he had too many ideas he wanted to cram into his last outing, and not all of it flowed together especially well.

I wouldn't say TDKR is even really all that comparable to SM3, other than maybe fan bickering. It was a much better-received film overall if you wanna be technical, anyway.

And a lot of the time the filmmakers or cast and crew don't go into a film "not caring". It's just that the final product might not turn out so well, or you might not like the film yourself, it happens.
 
I know people like to say TDKR isn't very good because of its story and what not, but you think it's a mess because it only features 24m of Batman? Seriously!

The film is more about Bruce than it is Batman, and actually, that's what I like about the film, most of all personally.

Happy for you that you like watching Batman movies without Batman in it, but I think they're boring as shit. Batman and Robin is more entertaining than every Nolan Batman movie combined.
 
I love these posts like "this movie is gonna suck cuz Chris Pine will be the best" like Cap and Thor weren't totally overshadowed by the supporting cast
Cap was the best part of the first and third movie. WS was the best part of the second movie, but Cap was amazing in it as well. WS would overshadow any MCU or DCU movie considering how terrible the villain roster has been in both of those franchises (well CBM overall bar very few exceptions).
 
B&R = solid 7/10

Begins = 3/10

TDK = 2/10

TDKR = 1/10

My math checks out
 
All this other bullshit aside, I have solid movie through and though. I think the reviews will be favorable and we'll be hearing of a sequel being "in development " soon after. I 'm not even gonna try and predict box office.
 
I don't agree with him at all, but I don't think it's fair to just label every bad opinion a troll.

Some people just have terrible standards of quality.
When your ranking is like that. That's no longer a bad opinion. That's straight up trolling.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom