LakeOf9
Member
One thing I wonder
Sony is now withdrawing from putting their games on PC. There are many reasons given for this, and I don't want to debate them again. However, one thing that undoubtedly allowed this decision to be made was that Sony's games on PC did not do too well. Their first few – Horizon: Zero Dawn, Days Gone, God of War – did, but everything since then has done middlingly to poor at best.
There are many reasons for this, of course – the ports got more mixed quality as time went on, the marketing started to be extremely lacking, the pricing got worse, the later ports were from PS5 sequels to PS4 games, which were more divisive with players, Sony enforced mandatory PSN logins, which locked out the bulk of the world which did not have support for PSN...
My question however is, if all else was equal – if the port quality for hypothetical Nintendo games on PC was at best the same as Sony's, if Nintendo Accounts were mandatory, if the ports were priced high, if the ports came much later than the Switch versions – would Nintendo's first party games do better than Sony's did on PC?
One part of why I am asking this question is that in a way I feel the PC venture broke the mystique around Sony's games, making it seem that they aren't anything special, just regular old games, and the prestige around them was more perception than anything. I am wondering if this is the case for all first party games, where their stature is more because of their rather specific and unique status, or if it was applicable to Sony, but maybe wouldn't be for Nintendo
Sony is now withdrawing from putting their games on PC. There are many reasons given for this, and I don't want to debate them again. However, one thing that undoubtedly allowed this decision to be made was that Sony's games on PC did not do too well. Their first few – Horizon: Zero Dawn, Days Gone, God of War – did, but everything since then has done middlingly to poor at best.
There are many reasons for this, of course – the ports got more mixed quality as time went on, the marketing started to be extremely lacking, the pricing got worse, the later ports were from PS5 sequels to PS4 games, which were more divisive with players, Sony enforced mandatory PSN logins, which locked out the bulk of the world which did not have support for PSN...
My question however is, if all else was equal – if the port quality for hypothetical Nintendo games on PC was at best the same as Sony's, if Nintendo Accounts were mandatory, if the ports were priced high, if the ports came much later than the Switch versions – would Nintendo's first party games do better than Sony's did on PC?
One part of why I am asking this question is that in a way I feel the PC venture broke the mystique around Sony's games, making it seem that they aren't anything special, just regular old games, and the prestige around them was more perception than anything. I am wondering if this is the case for all first party games, where their stature is more because of their rather specific and unique status, or if it was applicable to Sony, but maybe wouldn't be for Nintendo