Support NeoGAF

[daveo42]

Yes I would.

 

[Triggerhappytel]

I'd rather replay it on my PS3 and be blown away by how good it looks in that platform... rather than experience it as a port to superior hardware.

I would much, much rather replay it with the DualShock 4, given the choice.

 

[Newtype-001]

There still hasn't been an fps game that scratches the kz2 itch.

 

[Bolivar687]

Yes.

 

[Xion_Stellar]

YES

 

[JJD]

Day one. Loved the game.

Radec Academy all day and FUCK ALL THE THINGS DIE DIE DIE!

Haha, this!

 

[Fug Slanderson]

Nope. Didn't care for it too much, and graphics were not it's problem.

 

[BruceLeeRoy]

You guys are all insane saying no.
One of the best FPS games I've played.
With multiplayer I would be there day 1

 

[BouncyFrag]

Probably not.

 

[Portugeezer]

I would have said yes... but I still haven't even bought Uncharted Collection.

 

[Sjefen]

 

[Hasney]

I thought it was pretty terrible, so no.

Same. Wouldn't touch it again at any price.

 

[Dysun]

No, it was fun at the time but like God of War it's run its course. No interest in revisiting

 

[BBboy20]

Not sure.

 

[Pankratous]

I would much, much rather replay it with the DualShock 4, given the choice.

So connect your DS4 to your PS3.

 

[The Wraith]

As long as multiplayer is in there hell fucking yes! I love Killzone 2&3.

 

[FATALITY]

Yep I would. One of the best fps from last gen

 

[TheOfficeMut]

If the weapon latency was removed, yes.

 

[King_Moc]

No. The game is ok, but it's nothing special. There were plenty of fps franchises better than this that gen. Not everything deserves a remaster.

 

[RPGam3r]

No, the Killzone games have always felt off. I just don't like the way they control and the fiction is just not appealing.

 

[antitrop]

Absolutely. My PS3 is permanently retired and I never got around to it.

 

[Auto_aim1]

How about some new games, huh ?

There will never be a game like Killzone 2 so a remaster would be pretty awesome.

 

[PR_rambo]

If it had online multiplayer, yes.

Yup

 

[StrongBlackVine]

No. Fuck that final boss!

 

[AndreH121]

No but I would consider if it was part of an anthology at a really low price ($20 or so).

 

[Ce-Lin]

yes please, specially if it's 60 fps.

 

[Stallion Dan]

For the MP, I probably would.

Though they'd need fix the helghast base on Radec academy. Also not limit the drones/turrets so don't get teammates killing them to spawn their own.

 

[biteren]

Killzone 2 was good, but i woulnt mind a remake of the first Killzone, erase the stink of how bad it was

 

[ddikxela]

Gimme, gimme, gimme...

 

[DISSESHOWEDO]

You guys are all insane saying no.
One of the best FPS games I've played.
With multiplayer I would be there day 1

A lot of naysayers have not probably even played the best MP game of last gen!

 

[To Far Away Times]

Nope. The input lag was some of the worst ever and showed the Guerrilla was willing to push visuals at all costs, even at the expense of gameplay.

 

[Fbh]

Yes. But not for $60.

For $20-30 sure. I really loved this game, both single player and multiplayer.

 

[SirUltimos]

Nah. I've already played it and didn't particularly care for it in the first place, so I'd pass on it.

 

[lebowski4ever]

no..i wouldn't buy a remaster of killzone 2. the game was very average imo..didn't even finish it as i lost complete interest in it.

 

[AgentP]

Yes, best fps last gen.

 

[nib95]

Nope. The input lag was some of the worst ever and showed the Guerrilla was willing to push visuals at all costs, even at the expense of gameplay.

A Remaster at 60fps would essentially halve the input lag.

 

[HvySky]

Just remaster the multiplayer and release it as a free-to-play ala Killzone 3 on PS3.

 

[KodaRuss]

As long as it has the MP in it yes.

 

[Yazzees]

I don't like remasters.

 

[V-Gief]

Double edged proposition for me really. On the one hand, I would buy it and romp through the single player once more just for shits and giggles but it would really be the MP that would do it for me. On the other hand, if the MP wouldn't be as populated as it once was on PS3 I would be disappointed.

I would have to go with a cautious 'yes' and risk getting burned.

 

[Agent X]

I liked Killzone 2 a lot, but I'm not very interested in any "remasters" from PS3 to PS4, so I'd be inclined to say no.

If they added PlayStation Move support (similar to Killzone 3 on PS3) and priced it under $20, then I would consider it.

 

[Nocturno999]

Just remaster the multiplayer and release it as a free-to-play ala Killzone 3 on PS3.

A current gen F2P with the best maps, balance updates and skins for sale would be a great option.

A lot of people may prefer to play the single player campaign though.

 

[BiGBoSSMk23]

Killzone 2's novelty were the graphics at the time.

The campaign itself wasn't anything particularly memorable save for a couple of levels and the boss fight.

I don't think it would do the game any favours TBH.

Guerrilla could certainly borrow quite a few things from it for future games though.

 

[hesido]

In a heartbeat. I'm surprised at people not liking it! Best multiplayer fun I had on console along with Bf bad company 2.

 

[Game4life]

Best shooter of last gen? Hell yeah!

You guys are all insane saying no.
One of the best FPS games I've played.
With multiplayer I would be there day 1

Preach.

 

[antitrop]

Killzone 2's novelty were the graphics at the time.

The campaign itself wasn't anything particularly memorable save for a couple of levels and the boss fight.

I could say the exact same thing about God of War 3 and they bothered with that.

 

[Memorabilia]

Remastered trilogy yes, KZ2 by itself nah.

 

[LocknessMobster]

Hell yes in a heartbeat

 

[ChosenPredator]

stagnate too much remasters of games people should be wanting new.

 

[DISSESHOWEDO]

Killzone 2's novelty were the graphics at the time.

That is wrong on so many levels! KZ2's novelty was how unique and heavy you felt when playing, especially the MP! It was different than other FPS's during that time!