Not that silly. They're both about allowing one person to have power over another person's life.
Internationally, the concept is completely dead and buried and is seen as barbaric. If anything, it's the supporters who are naive about the long-term viability when nearly everyone outside the US laughs at it.
We don't care what people outside of the U.S. think about it. For me personally it means that I get to target shoot and safely experience something firsthand that said rest of world will never get to do, despite it being a major factor in how the world has been shaped. I find guns interestong from a historical standpoint. Actually shooting them allows me to also respect just how powerful they are. Yes, it's horible what they do to people when used for their "intended" purpose, but hey doesn't mean they have to be used that way. They can be used in a way that is safe and enjoyable, and that's how most people here use them. If that's too hard for the rest of the world to understand, then oh well! It really doesn't change my opinion. If someone wants me to take their opinion on guns seriously I really hope they have at least experienced shooting a gun. In the same way that if someone has an opinion about some violent game like GTA, I really hope they've at least played the game.
As a gun owner, the typical "ban em all" view on guns (mostly from foreigners who have never touched a gun and are scared of them) is just as silly as when Fox News talks about how horrible GTA is. It's the epitome of placing blame on an easy target while the genuine cause of the issue in question lies elsewhere (though is more complex).