krae_man said:
My Thoughts Exactly.
Doesn't anybody tell creative after they write something "That makes no fucking sense, write something that makes sense"?
Cena has a rematch clause, he doesn't need a reason to hate Del Rio. And even if he did, the reason could have been attackng Mysterio after the bell.
WWE writer's have absolutely no idea about a little thing called 'continuity'. It has plagued wrestling since the 80's. The writers think that fans have a memory span of like 3 months. Once those three months are over, you can have a character doing the exact opposite thing for the most absurd reasons.
Cena is all about things being fair and done properly, but he didn't care that he had to fight Rey Mysterio after he just finished in the mini-tournament for the World Title. No, he gladly accepted the fight. If Cena was supposed to be the character that the WWE wants him to be portrayed as, he would've said "Look Rey you already had a match tonight, and it was a good one. Even though they want me to wrestle you tonight, I think it's fair to you if we fight next week when you're rested up."
I don't understand how delusional the writing staff can truly be. I know that it basically filters down to McMahon giving the final word, but can these people either know what the fuck they're supposed to be writing for or about, or grow a damn spine and tell Vince that his ideas in this day and age are dated and uninteresting or don't make any sense. He is completely out of touch with the fan base. Yes, they have a lot of fans that are kids, but so are a lot of teenagers and young adults. And guess who has to watch wrestling with their kids every week? The parents! Give these adults and teenagers something a bit edgier. I wouldn't even be made if RAW was a 3 hour program. Make 8-9 somewhat of a more PG-oriented style showing with slightly more emphasis on matches rather. Then from 9-11 make it PG13 like what we saw in the attitude era and have multiple storylines going on.
There needs to be some sort of long term planning in the WWE and its storylines. Yes, some impromptu stories are great. But for the titles, they need to lay out the plans so they know what the exact course of action will be (minus any injuries). This way they can keep their consistency and continuity properly.
It made absolutely no sense for Cena to go on that outrage on Monday night. Cena lost his match to Punk then Punk lost to Del Rio. The logical route would be that both Cena and Punk are deserving a rematch so set up the next PPV as a triple threat match, or 2-3 weeks before the next PPV have Cena and Punk fight for the #1 contendership. How many of you bet that they won't go with either of those routes? The ones that make the most sense.
I'm sick of seeing only one real storyline and it revolves around the World Title. What about the US Title? What about the IC title? And the tag team division where the champions only fight teams composed of 2 randomly put together wrestlers. I want stories to be built up where there's a clear end or alteast progression to it. If they're fighting at a PPV show vignette or a video package about the history of these two. A great example of how poor these mid-card storylines would be Swagger vs. Bourne. The match existed simply because Bourne attacked Swagger after their match and ran in after another Swagger match? Why should I care about this at all. I think both are great wrestlers, but what's the point of this storyline and who am I supposed to care for?
For the record, I loved Jeff Jarrett's run in WCW. He's the reason I even watched WCW to begin with.