ElBoxyBrown
Banned
Other than the Playstation, what other Sony thing from their other branches is hot? I'm hearing they're doing fine but they don't seem to show it.
If only Sony had the balls to end their film division their numbers would seem better.
Other than the Playstation, what other Sony thing from their other branches is hot? I'm hearing they're doing fine but they don't seem to show it.
They are a publicly traded company. They show of how their divisions are doing quarterly by law. Wtf is going on in this thread?!Other than the Playstation, what other Sony thing from their other branches is hot? I'm hearing they're doing fine but they don't seem to show it.
If only Sony had the balls to end their film division their numbers would seem better.
Pretty much every division of Sony outside of Playstation is doing poorly. Thats kind of important.
My thoughts. Their film division is dragging their brand through the mud and shows no signs of improvement.
Yikes. It's like Groundhog Day for me when people start talking trading multiples.
Nintendo is overvalued relative to peers because you pay a lot for future earnings. For $1 of EBITDA, you are paying 27 dollars. Yeowza. I mean not exactly but this is how you should think about it.
When you go to buy a video game, would you buy a game that costs such a premium to other games? You might say depends on the game. Investors are generally speaking not like that. Most public comparable trade in a very tight range. "Pharma" trades like pharma, retail like retail, etc. Only really best in class names that sustain high growth over long periods of time--or more importantly project high growth far into the future-- trade at continued premiums relative to peers.
Does no one see the risk in investing in a stock after it's run up 50%? Is it more likely to run up another 50% (given historical trading range) or run down? Hence it's expensive.
I mean...brands or some shit.
I don't get this.
Everything other than playstation is burning the ground.
Even the mobile division...
What are they talking about?
Other than the Playstation, what other Sony thing from their other branches is hot? I'm hearing they're doing fine but they don't seem to show it.
It's the same guy that made the article in this thread:
http://m.neogaf.com/showthread.php?t=1300375
It's the same guy that made the article in this thread:
http://m.neogaf.com/showthread.php?t=1300375
Baby Driver? Spiderman: Homecoming? The Dark Tower?
Pretty much every division of Sony outside of Playstation is doing poorly. Thats kind of important.
whatyearisit.gif
No, that's not the case at all. They've more divisions making profit than divisions that lose money.
Actually, considering the sales of Nintendo consoles and games, compared to stuff like Angry Birds and Minecraft, this is no longer true. Our generation grew up playing Nintendo games. Every kid after 1990, at least until the success of the Wii, would have grown up playing Playstation, with only a small portion having access to Nintendo's games.
Far far more kids these days grow up playing Angry Birds and Minecraft than Nintendo properties. And Nintendo is only really now trying to capitalize on expanded media to leverage their IP in wider non-gaming mediums, like mobile Apps, movies and theme parks. They should have been doing this decades ago.
Nintendo isn't even close to Disney and I'd say that unless they can be successful in their future non-gaming ventures, as well as actually start taking mobile gaming on iOS/Android seriously, they'll be at a real risk of their properties becoming less an less relevant to young kids (especially in the west) as time goes on.
My man, I am a huge fan of the book series,but I'm not sure we can count on the tower yet. That one is def a wait and see.
True, and there is a difference between a good/bad movie and having a box office hit. Case is point, Despicable Me 3. Bad reviews but nr 1 at box office in the US. Lets hope Dark Tower is good and sells tickets.
Just because your #1 at the box office doesn't always mean your doing good. Case and point: The Last Knight.
See this quote in the OP?
It's the same guy that made the article in this thread:
http://m.neogaf.com/showthread.php?t=1300375
Chips and Sensors are on the up, but they've been pumping money into Colombia Pictures to stop it from flat-lining - not to mention having to downsize TV and Mobile and jettison Laptops.
$^@&$ -6% because of this bullshit article. It will rebound but thanks but no thanks Jacky Wong.
Yikes. It's like Groundhog Day for me when people start talking trading multiples.
Nintendo is overvalued relative to peers because you pay a lot for future earnings. For $1 of EBITDA, you are paying 27 dollars. Yeowza. I mean not exactly but this is how you should think about it.
When you go to buy a video game, would you buy a game that costs such a premium to other games? You might say depends on the game. Investors are generally speaking not like that. Most public comparable trade in a very tight range. "Pharma" trades like pharma, retail like retail, etc. Only really best in class names that sustain high growth over long periods of time--or more importantly project high growth far into the future-- trade at continued premiums relative to peers.
Does no one see the risk in investing in a stock after it's run up 50%? Is it more likely to run up another 50% (given historical trading range) or run down? Hence it's expensive.
I mean...brands or some shit.
Ummm. Undervalued? Are you sure? I think all the folks who know their stuff in the thread disagree. FWIW I disagree too, though I'm not claiming particular expertise beyond seeing the comparisons between the financial reports.
There's probably no good reason to justify it outside of a kind of silly hunch. I think it's entirely possible to be "bothered" (I'm not bothered, I just think it's dumb) by the headline and have no interest in console wars or any of that stuff.
Whatyearisit.gif
I don't think so. Do they not see Nintendo's eventual ventures outside of video games media not of value? Because when their movie deals and theme parks come around its gonna be incredible for Nintendo. That on top of their pretty good mobile business with Animal Crossing on the horizon, and the Switch doing pretty good.
Whats Sony got? A failing movie division and a great video game side.
Personally with Nintendo's IP they have the capacity to become huge outside of video games media, and they have plans to take advantage of that finally. I don't see Nintendo's stock being overvalued.
You can't post the slide alongside your ridiculous hyperbole. The slide you posted literally says 6% lol. And they're pretty much making the same amount of income on that drop in sales.this looks pretty bad, their sales are dropping by large % which is bad for the company from a long term perspective.
I really wouldn't base purchasing stock or financial choices on a paper that Rupert Murdoch owns. :-/
That said, Sony has a more diverse amount of risk.
Nintendo has a focused amount of risk.
While Sony has the potential to do far better, they also have the potential to do far worse. Nintendo is a safe long term bet, but Sony could make you more money in the future... emphasis on could.
That's not at all how growth stocks work, and Nintendo is a growth stock for the time being until Switch reaches it's peak. Just look at what NTDOY did during the Wii era for an idea of what may happen. If you're sitting on NTDOY you'd be a fool to sell it because some WSJ guy wrote an article to drive the price down so his big institutional and hedge fund friends could get in.
If you had bought NVDA at any point after it has run up 50% throughout 2016 you would still have made an unbelievable amount of money by now. According to your advice, my original shares of NVDA that I bought for $11.80 back in 2012, after they gained 50% I should have sold them all. I mean imagine if I had sold all my NVDA at $15, or $20, or $30, or $45, etc. You what I actually did? Up until my final buy at $123, I keep adding to my stake. NVDA's stock is currently at $134 and it was as high as $164 earlier this year. I can't imagine how I would feel if I had sold all my NVDA instead of adding to it as it ran upwards. Yikes.
Actually, considering the sales of Nintendo consoles and games, compared to stuff like Angry Birds and Minecraft, this is no longer true. Our generation grew up playing Nintendo games. Every kid after 1990, at least until the success of the Wii, would have grown up playing Playstation, with only a small portion having access to Nintendo's games.
Far far more kids these days grow up playing Angry Birds and Minecraft than Nintendo properties. And Nintendo is only really now trying to capitalize on expanded media to leverage their IP in wider non-gaming mediums, like mobile Apps, movies and theme parks. They should have been doing this decades ago.