• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Xbox 360 Elite officially announced. GameSpot Feature

Arthursw1 said:
This is XBOX 360 Elite!!! ta da!!!
MarkyMark.jpg

how do you figure that?

the game play is EXACTLY THE SAME!
 
travisbickle said:
The thing I don't get is people always bitch on here about it all being down to gaming and getting games onto the console, now the 360 has a split user base


A % of users have no storage and no online play

A % of users have storage and no online play

A % of users have online play with and without storage

A % of users have memory card, 20 GB or 120 GB drive

As a developer they are major differences, with the new massive storage developers will love to make downloadable games like "Warhawk" but have potential problems with users, same with online play not everyone has it how much do developers create for online play because of that.

The added space is great for movies/tv programmes but what happened to the "concentrating on games" schtick Microsoft were on about the standard is memory card no online-play xbox 360.

They've had this split for the lifetime of the console. A difference between 20 and 120 makes little to no difference to said developers.

It seems to have done okay for the software.
 
jordan0386 said:
How do you come to the conclusion they are picking a Wii, when they have an interest in HD gaming?
I'm saying he's either going to be turned off by HDTV because of all the different standards or he's going to go with PS3 because it has all bases covered out of the box. Microsoft just made the 360 a lot more complicated to consumers by including so many options. This isn't an iPod, it's a game system.
 
But the ipod system works...I think that is why they are doing this

Way too many options across the board on all electronics...but, it helps because you can buy what you can afford

Thats all it bows down to, buying what you can afford

The 3 tier Xbox 360 was always the plan...that was the very first leak...we shouldnt be so selective in our anger
 
m0dus said:
And yet, none of that has any affect on what games can or cannot be played across the skus. therefore, it is not a "split userbase". A "split userbase" is, by definition, a rift in game playing capabilities determined by hardware iiterations. That is not the case with the 360. Going by your logic, after that fashion, adding any accessory to any console "splits" the userbase between that consumer and the rest of the world. That's simply not the case. The fact that ALL 360 games play on ALL 360's is pure evidence that MS's focus is games--this sku is for people who are interested in digital content as well.

As far as downloadable games, it has been stated that nothing will exceed the capacity offered by the 20 gig hdd, as that is the primary focus. In addition, it stands to be said that the CORE system generally sells to consumers who do NOT go online, thus their small segment of the market is negligable with respect to any downloadable games. Again, it's an issue of accessories, should one of those walmart shoppers decide they want a hdd, it's as simple as buying it and adding it on.
Well, that argument can be laid to rest. You killed it, buried it, said the prayer. :lol
 
options all over the industry.
Ipod, pcs, cars, etc.

Now you can have them in consoles too!

If they can live with all that, how is this any different.
It's giving people options, and it splits NOTHING. It's all just gravy.
 
MadOdorMachine said:
Joe Blow just filed his tax returns, bought his wife and kids some new clothes and has two grand left over to burn though. He tells the sales clerk he's thinking about getting an HDTV too. The sales clerk tells him that PS3 costs $600, it plays on every type of tv no matter what type of video or audio connection it needs, it supports a new type of control and it's 100% backward compatable with all Playstation systems before it. Everything he needs is included in the box, but he will have to buy a different video cable depending on what type of connection his tv has.

After hearing about all the different types of high definition, Joe Blow scratches his head. "That's a lot to take in." he said.

The sales clerk replies, "I know it seems complicated. Everything you need is included right out of the box. It even plays high definition movies."

Ok, I think you're making too much of the comparison, but I wanted to have both. The PS3 part is pretty much right on. Well, except you're expecting a Walmart employee to have this knowledge. That might be reaching. :)


Joe Blow looks over at three different models of Xbox 360 and asks , "What about the Xbox 360, it's only $299, does that play high definition movies?"
The clerk then begins to explain that it does, but that he will have to buy a separate add-on unit for it and depending on which one he buys, he'll have to connect it to the internet to download the required software to do it. He explains the differences between the three different units and that depending on what type of tv he has he will have to choose a different type of unit. All the video cables are included though.

The sales clerk can tell Joe Blow looks really confused at this point, but he doesn't want to lose a customer. "The Elite Xbox 360 and the HD-DVD add on will do everything the PS3 does, but it costs $680. If you just want it for games then you have to decide whether you want a hard drive or not so it's either $299 or $399."

At this point Joe Blow will more than likely choose Wii, and completely forget about HDTV or PS3 because it's easier and more value. Only gamers who put a lot of research in are going to be going for a 360 now. Ironically, all the "options" are what's going to hurt 360 with these type of comsumers. In the end it's about the games though. He who has the best games wins.


Here's the thing. That guy who bought the Wii had no intention of worrying about High Definition movies. And that same clerk could have ended a lot of confusion by pointing the person to the Premium pack and saying "For an extra $100 you can get a unit with a hard drive, and wireless controllers that not only plays the same games, but allows you to download and watch high definition movies right from the console. And instead of $599, it's only $399". And if the add-on is important for the sale, the $399 + $199 add-on = PS3 60GB, and you still get the Xbox 360 games you want. At that point you can fight about the PS3 vs. the 360 games, value, etc:,

Anyway, I think too much is made of that type of situation. Most Joe Blow folks are going to look at the console, look at the games, and buy the console. They have to be sold on the movie aspect of it.
 
m0dus said:
And yet, none of that has any affect on what games can or cannot be played across the skus. therefore, it is not a "split userbase". A "split userbase" is, by definition, a rift in game playing capabilities determined by hardware iiterations.


For developers they have different functions...

You have a number of people that won't contemplate online due to cost, and you have storage ranging from 64mbs to 120gbs.

We know, due to developers comments, the lack of hard drive prevents certain functions within games -caching and streaming, but I don't want concentrate on that here.

My train of thought was looking at "Little Big Planet", the proclaimed breath of fresh air for this tired industry, a downloadable game with multiple player online and community features - available to everyone on PS3, not so on the 360.

Microsoft have to concentrate on DVD sized offline games that don't require extra storage of a harddrive because they have made that option viable to the consumer. That's there bread and butter, and they can't keep producing higher standards of this console because less and less developers will be inclined to use it. You (a developer) have a quality game that's about 3GBs and its biggest asset is its online/community play, you haven't got the resources to distribute it on disc, which company do you go to with your idea?
 
You make a decent game...and nobody is gonna publish it...where did you get the money to make the game, in the first place


try again...
 
travisbickle said:
For developers they have different functions...

You have a number of people that won't contemplate online due to cost, and you have storage ranging from 64mbs to 120gbs.

We know, due to developers comments, the lack of hard drive prevents certain functions within games -caching and streaming, but I don't want concentrate on that here.

My train of thought was looking at "Little Big Planet", the proclaimed breath of fresh air for this tired industry, a downloadable game with multiple player online and community features - available to everyone on PS3, not so on the 360.

Microsoft have to concentrate on DVD sized offline games that don't require extra storage of a harddrive because they have made that option viable to the consumer. That's there bread and butter, and they can't keep producing higher standards of this console because less and less developers will be inclined to use it. You (a developer) have a quality game that's about 3GBs and its biggest asset is its online/community play, you haven't got the resources to distribute it on disc, which company do you go to with your idea?
That is an issue with the differing strategies of Sony's and Microsoft's online distribution systems, and not with the "split userbase".
 
Holy crap what a mess. No matter how you spin it this is isnt appealing to more the like 20k hardcore fans out there.
 
GhaleonEB said:
What if someone wants to buy the 360 with the bigger HDD? The options are spend $580 for the Premium plus bigger HDD, or get a Core and the 120 GB drive, but not get the headset, wireless controller and component cable with it. Pretty crappy choices. Solution? Elite SKU.

Solution? Quite gouging the hell out of the peripheral prices.

Then core users could upgrade without worry of being ripped off.

That is come circular reasoning there. Well he HAVE to charge $180 for the HDD, therefore, we had to create a new SKU so we didn't rip people off. :lol

Arne - For all the talk about choice, MS is doing the opposite by creating these SKU's and then putting the peripheral pricing through the sky.

If they wanted to offer true choice, they would offer the core as the base package, and a wide variety of reasonably priced peripherals so the user can build their own.
 
I agree that it makes business sense (potentially great) but as far as gameplay experiences go I think you will see some really bad examples going forward due to the lack of HDD. Oblivion for example the loading times are just massively longer. And you still at least have to invest 40$ to be able to save your progress.
 
m0dus said:
The core is not for 'us'. the core is for MS's entry into emerging markets (especially overseas) and creating a viable cheaper sku from the outset that retains its game-playing functionality within $50 of its closest-priced competitor, and $200 less than the 20 GB PS3. I think, when the price drops, people will realize that the CORE was, in fact, an excellent idea out the door on MS's part, for those aforementioned markets.
If the Core hits $199 this fall, or even $249, I expect it will begin to constitute a much higher proportion of 360 sales than current. It's a strategic move which is dependant on tapping into the budget segment; that segment isn't looking at $300 to the same degree.
 
madara said:
Holy crap what a mess. No matter how you spin it this is isnt appealing to more the like 20k hardcore fans out there.

I guess that is why the Elite is limited edition.
 
OWCH. I JUST BOUGHT MY 360 ON SATURDAY.

anyone know what is ebgames return policy? can i cook up some excuse to get my money back and wait for this bad boy?
 
Microsoft should have eliminated the core system..its really simple as that. Make the premium system $349 and the elite $399. What they are doing makes zero sense.
 
MadOdorMachine said:
To all of the people defending the new elite 360, cheers to you, but think about it from the average consumer standpoint:

Joe Blow goes into Wal-Mart and he's thinking about buying one of the new game systems. He looks over and sees a Wii. It costs $250, and after a few minutes of talking to a sales clerk, figures out that it's made for normal tvs, supports a new type of control, and is 100% backward compatable with all Nintendo systems before it. Everything he needs for it is included in the box.

Joe Blow just filed his tax returns, bought his wife and kids some new clothes and has two grand left over to burn though. He tells the sales clerk he's thinking about getting an HDTV too. The sales clerk tells him that PS3 costs $600, it plays on every type of tv no matter what type of video or audio connection it needs, it supports a new type of control and it's 100% backward compatable with all Playstation systems before it. Everything he needs is included in the box, but he will have to buy a different video cable depending on what type of connection his tv has.

After hearing about all the different types of high definition, Joe Blow scratches his head. "That's a lot to take in." he said.

The sales clerk replies, "I know it seems complicated. Everything you need is included right out of the box. It even plays high definition movies."

Joe Blow looks over at three different models of Xbox 360 and asks , "What about the Xbox 360, it's only $299, does that play high definition movies?"
The clerk then begins to explain that it does, but that he will have to buy a separate add-on unit for it and depending on which one he buys, he'll have to connect it to the internet to download the required software to do it. He explains the differences between the three different units and that depending on what type of tv he has he will have to choose a different type of unit. All the video cables are included though.

The sales clerk can tell Joe Blow looks really confused at this point, but he doesn't want to lose a customer. "The Elite Xbox 360 and the HD-DVD add on will do everything the PS3 does, but it costs $680. If you just want it for games then you have to decide whether you want a hard drive or not so it's either $299 or $399."

At this point Joe Blow will more than likely choose Wii, and completely forget about HDTV or PS3 because it's easier and more value. Only gamers who put a lot of research in are going to be going for a 360 now. Ironically, all the "options" are what's going to hurt 360 with these type of comsumers. In the end it's about the games though. He who has the best games wins.

I loled

:lol
 
The main thing that is rubbing me the wrong way about this is the arrogance shown on Major Nelson. It just seems like Microsoft is declaring victory already when a PS3 price-drop could put a major dent in their lead. The Elite is not really something I want. HDMI, so what, component and VGA are enough for me. The hard drive is nice, but I still have 6.3GB left on mine now. I have no clue why they didn't want to include HD-DVD in the damned thing. They keep trying to spin-spin-spin, but it makes no sense at all. No wireless in the damned thing, and still keeping the price of the adapter for 100 bucks?

MS just KICKED the door wide open for PS3. Because even though I am not interested in the Elite, in comparison the mere fact that MS is pricing it like it is makes me think that a $600 PS3 isn't that bad.
 
neojubei said:
I guess that is why the Elite is limited edition.

It is not limited edition if it was people would not be so up in arms over it. Paying a few dollars more to get something early in a new color is not so bad. A new periment SKU that makes the PS3 look like a bargin is stupid and that is what the elite does.
 
btrboyev said:
Microsoft should have eliminated the core system..its really simple as that. Make the premium system $349 and the elite $399. What they are doing makes zero sense.

Ok. So then what will be the draw away from the Wii? What sounds better?

"Here, spend $50 more and get an Xbox 360"
or
"Here, spend $150 more and get an Xbox 360".

Granted, you can still opt to buy the Premium 360. But consider the key word there......OPT.


MS just KICKED the door wide open for PS3. Because even though I am not interested in the Elite, in comparison the mere fact that MS is pricing it like it is makes me think that a $600 PS3 isn't that bad.

I still don't understand this logic. There are still two less expensive SKU's than the Elite, and all three SKU's are still over $100 cheaper than the 60GB PS3.

Sigh. It's lunch time.
 
m0dus said:
seriously, people worried about HDD pricing need only to wait until april-may. when the market is flooded with used 20gb HDD's, grabbing one used at Gamestop for $30-$50 will be a non-issue.

Well that may be a realworld solution, but it doesn't change the bone-head strategy MS is implementing.

I mean, how much profit are thgey really making on these HDD's? And is it really worth having the percieved price of the system raised by $100???

MS could essentially do a $100 pricedrop simply by dropping the price on their HDD's.

By making a slim profit on the 20gb HDD, say $50 at retail, the core would become extremely attractive at $299 for users without HDTV.

By releasing the 120GB at a reasonable price, say $100, they would remove the need for a 3rd sku entirely, and could simply integrate HDMI into existing models when the time comes, it's a niche feature anyways.

This entire thing reeks of pinching pennies.
 
I really don't understand how yall can be so indignant about what just another choice for the consumer. If you don't like it, you have two other options to you to enjoy all the 360 games that you want to play. I will get one of these, mostly because I use Marketplace so much. I absolutely cannot stand advertising and don't have access to network shows in HD so watching the few shows I like via Marketplace is the best thing for me since Chinese checkers. I already have the wireless adapter, and I can just reattach it to the Elite and put the old 360 in the bedroom. I don't care about how this makes people I don't know reassess their views about the PS3.
 
I keep trying to figure out why this "makes the PS3 look like a better deal" when the 360 does things that the PS3 doesn't even do that may be desirable to certain customers.

Just like the PS3 does some things (plays hi-def movies on a disc, home, when it comes out, linux, etc.) that the 360 doesn't do. But it's not as one sided as everyone seems to think.

They each have their own strengths and weaknesses. The only difference is that the 360 has cheaper options for people who just want games.
 
I hate this kind of crap. I'd like to have a bigger HDD for my 360, but not at that price. This feels like a bait and switch - like I'm being punished as an early adopter. You would think MS would have a program to offer discount to those who bought in earlier, thinking that they were getting the top of the line system instead of asking them to pay $100 more than a brand new customer. Premium, Elite, what's next, the UberBox?
 
I think the problem here is MS had a choice....either shoot for the sky or lower the price....they played it safe and took the middle ground and it does them no good.

This elite should have been either an HDMI, HD-DVD, wireless, 120gb packing 65nm beast of an Xbox and price it right along the PS3 at $599 and let the big spenders go to town...then Sony has nothing to say

or

make it a Pro in black finish with a bigger Hard Drive and HDMI (or even just HDMI and sell the HDD separate) and price it at $399

MS split the middle and it is gonna miss
 
urk said:
I hate this kind of crap. I'd like to have a bigger HDD for my 360, but not at that price. This feels like a bait and switch - like I'm being punished as an early adopter. You would think MS would have a program to offer discount to those who bought in earlier, thinking that they were getting the top of the line system instead of asking them to pay $100 more than a brand new customer. Premium, Elite, what's next, the UberBox?

That is the price you pay as an earl adopter. I don't remember sony offering a trade in program when the slim PS2 launched. I don't remember nintendo having a trade in program for any of their 2000 hardware revisions of the ds,gb,gba and nes.
 
6 hours later and I haven't read anybody bringing anything new to the table. it's as if the first 14 pages didn't exist.
 
I just saw this, and that the rumors were true. It would have been an ok move limited.. i have no clue why they are making it permanent.

All I want is a X360 with improved HD space, and the new 65NM everyone is talking about if it helps with any heat/breakdown issues by the time Halo 3 launches. I kinda thought there would be a price drop this year too, but that doesn't seem likely with them announcing all new more expensive SKU's.

I can live with the $399 price tag if they can just pack in a bit larger HD, and make the thing more reliable.
 
arne said:
6 hours later and I haven't read anybody bringing anything new to the table. it's as if the first 14 pages didn't exist.

Tell me about it - I just read a few more pages, and people are STILL saying that the Elite "kicks the door wide open for the PS3", even though it's still cheaper than the "cheap" PS3 (which doesn't exist in Europe BTW, it's strictly €599 or bust up here), and as if the Core and Premium suddenly don't exist anymore...

But carry on guys, continue to complain about things not targetted at you, as if there isn't a choice - choice is bad now!
 
StingerNLG said:
I still don't understand this logic. There are still two less expensive SKU's than the Elite, and all three SKU's are still over $100 cheaper than the 60GB PS3.

Sigh. It's lunch time.


I am only speaking for myself, but when MS is offering this new unit for basically 100 less than a PS3 which has a blu-ray player and a wireless adapter built-in, there is a natual comparison. A comparison that actually justifies the $600 price tag for a PS3. I am only speaking for myself, but if MS is charging 479 for a unit that doesn't have a HD-DVD player or wireless built-in, then maybe that $600 is a bargain for those things in the PS3.

My point is that MS has put out a 360 at a premium price, without premium features. Therefore making any comparison to the $500 or $600 PS3s a favorable one for Sony. This was a mistake. We pulled some of the same crap at Compaq and got hammered for it. We, like MS, kept the units that were cheaper on the board, but what happened is the magazines and buyers only compared the top skus of the competitors and our higher priced competitors gave more bang for the buck. That is what is happening now. Are you going to piece together an elite, wirless adaptor, and HD-DVD player for $779 or are you going to buy a PS3 for $600? That is the strategy Sony should use to attack MS. Looking at the gaming press' reaction, I think they will be telling the same story.

Just speaking from real-world pricing and marketing experience.
 
Skilotonn said:
But carry on guys, continue to complain about things not targetted at you, as if there isn't a choice - choice is bad now!

It doesn't matter if it isn't targeted to them because they are the ones who are most likely to rebuy a console.
 
GS said:
Aside from the hard drive and HDMI differences, Microsoft has told GameSpot that the underlying hardware in all three models remains the same. We're all going to have to wait a little while longer for that smaller, cooler CPU design

pass. fix the damn overheat MS, ASAP.
 
SyNapSe said:
I can live with the $399 price tag if they can just pack in a bit larger HD, and make the thing more reliable.

Exactly. I have only had one critical (red lights) error on me, but judging by most 360 owners it's only a matter of time before mine breaks down as well.
 
I really would not have a problem with this Elite SKU priced at $480 if microsoft somehow comes to its senses and drops the Premium SKU to $299. Then, if you want to upgrade your HDD, pop another $180 for the 120 GB HDD. Your total spending: $480, which is comparable to Elite.
 
While I do think that the accessories are a rip off and that the XBOX elite is just a ploy to increase profits more.

I can't help but think that stuff like this justifies why we need 3 consoles in the race. We need checks and balances. MS knows that they still have the premium so they could create a higher margin product so that they could make money before the big push for consoles in Fall where they may go in the red again.

I see the elite as something MS could always have as the product that could keep the console in the black while they could push the Premium and Core down to the hardcore base.
 
Top Bottom