Uno Venova
Banned
That's what I always thought. But it needed to be re-confirmed since whenever MS has a poor or anti consumer practice announced there's a vocal 'sony too crowd' that suddenly appears.
Sony sure is smart, keep letting MS make the first move and recieve the backlash so they can do the opposite and play the knight in shining armor.
It's not like the share button takes up an important place on the controller that could be used for primary gaming functions. It's pretty out of the way.
I agree that PS+ was already a good value for a long time. Sony obviously thinks their conversation rate isn't high enough, despite offering a good service.PS+ doesn't need more adding to it to make it good value. It already is. MS need to "add" features because on its own XBLG isn't as good value. Though they seem to be doing the wrong things to try and turn that around.
I doubt this is Sony doing anything in contrast to MS.
In an alternative world it would do something: Show you a checkout page to insert wallet details. Exciting!I dont know how anyone had any doubt. there is a dedicated button on the controller for god sake. How stupid would it be having a button which didn't do anything
Honestly, I doubt I'll use it much, either. But it's something that Sony really wants to push - it's a key part of the system - and putting that button on the controller is a good way to put the feature in people's faces and get them to use it.
Was a button just for share really that necessary? I mean i could imagine using it once in a while but definitely not something with great regularity.
Was a button just for share really that necessary? I mean i could imagine using it once in a while but definitely not something with great regularity.
And thank goodness for that!I just get the feeling that Sony, on their own, wouldn't even be able to conceive the idea of locking an offline feature behind an online fee.
This is the simple truth.Actually, this isn't great at all.
It's the basic expectation to use your hardware features without paying a monthly fee.
It's not that this is great, it's that what MS is doing is utterly unacceptable.
So apparently our favorite PR mouthpiece Shuhei Yoshida
I agree that PS+ was already a good value for a long time. Sony obviously thinks their conversation rate isn't high enough, despite offering a good service.
I still recommend PS+ for people that are only buying a PS3 at this time, because of the IGC. It's a great value and is just fantastic for people with kids, as they will always have something new to play.
Actually, this isn't great at all.
It's the basic expectation to use your hardware features without paying a monthly fee.
It's not that this is great, it's that what MS is doing is utterly unacceptable.
In this case at least I think that's bullshit. Sony never planned to gate share features behind PS+.
Wait, isn't 'mouthpiece' a derogatory term? Shuhei is awesome; he's easily one of the best execs out of the Big Three if not all videogame publishers.
Maybe this doesn't serve an immediate use to you but what it does facilitate is exposure of games, even particularly ones that you didn't anticipate would entice you.
An example for me is DayZ. I had heard of it for some months and I am not remotely interested in zombie games. 10 or 20 vids or so later, I hopped on the DayZ hype train and was my most played game of 2012.
I just get the feeling that Sony, on their own, wouldn't even be able to conceive the idea of locking an offline feature behind an online fee. Maybe after MS shows that people are willing to pay it for an entire generation... again.
I thought it was tongue in cheek.Wait, isn't 'mouthpiece' a derogatory term? Shuhei is awesome; he's easily one of the best execs out of the Big Three if not all videogame publishers.
Exactly this here. Overnext generation this will be behind a pay wall. MS will make it possible.