• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

You had one job, Ubisoft...

11370966-pirates-gold-dos-duelling-the-spanish-captain.png


>

0000000678.1920x1080.jpg
 
I've notice the bad lighting and commented multiple times about it. I didn't see anyone else say anything so I thought maybe o was just crazy. 😵‍💫
 
modern engines with their seni-automated way to light everything and to add reflecions via SSR with a simple mouse click made game artists complacent and worse.

there's a reason people think Arkham Knight looks better than most modern games. the amount of tricks Rocksteady had to apply, and the amount of UE3 engine tweaks they did to get the results you see in Arkham Knight far outnumber the work anyone at Ubisoft did in this remake.
 
What kind of counter-argument is this? This isn't a freakin' anime.
Your repsonse was ridiculous, so I gave one equal.

That being said, it fits perfectly within the logic of your statement.

You were directly relating vibrancy of colors to a mediums theme of violence. Nothing to do with art style.
 
This is a big problem across all of media. A lot of people pointed this out comparing shots of Devil Wears Prada and the sequel. The sequel looks like a made for TV movie from the 1990s, just everything lit very flat and evenly, no contrast, no staging, no use of shadows to emphasize different parts of the scene, just light that shit up. Apparently this cancer has infested games.
This.
I've been complaining about this for ages.
A film or TV show from the 90's/00's in HD looks absolutely amazing on modern TV's when it 4K It's striking.
The lighting, blacks, skin tones etc.
Everything is everything just pops, and I don't mean vivid or anything like that, it's reaching the right values you expect it to look like.
Shit I was surprised by warm sunlight beams shattered dynamically across actors as they moved, it looked like they was in a real place.
But nope, a set
Then we get this modern wash out crap.
And it's intentional too, because apparently how it looks on their iPhones is realistic.
 
Last edited:
That's not to say that I think all modern film and TV looks terrible. Rewatching Better Call Saul atm and I think it looks great, and I don't really watch superhero movies and stuff so I can't speak to that.

Could you point me to a couple examples if you can think of anything off the top of your head of really bad lighting in modern films/tv, so I can get a look at what you mean? TGO TGO
 
Your repsonse was ridiculous, so I gave one equal.

That being said, it fits perfectly within the logic of your statement.

You were directly relating vibrancy of colors to a mediums theme of violence. Nothing to do with art style.
No, I was saying it's a gritty pirate game where vibrant rainbow colors make no sense without contrasting with the darker tones. The original nailed this perfectly. Bright and sunny but still somber. This one looks like a damn carnival.
 
That's not to say that I think all modern film and TV looks terrible. Rewatching Better Call Saul atm and I think it looks great, and I don't really watch superhero movies and stuff so I can't speak to that.

Could you point me to a couple examples if you can think of anything off the top of your head of really bad lighting in modern films/tv, so I can get a look at what you mean? TGO TGO
It's everywhere, there's a few that's okay but
Here this video explains it pretty good.
 
>Jarvis I need more gaf karma points.
>Whats it going to be Today master? Something woke? Xbox did something stupid?
>Nah, lets go with hating Ubisoft
>Alright, here you go:
>But, Jarvis, that's how realistic lighting and shadowing works, theyre in the Caribbean, ofc the sun is fucking hot and powerful
>Nah dont worry, gaf loves to hate Ubisoft for the dumbest reasons.
>Alright gotcha, Imma post this topic!, hopefully that Cockatrice guy doesnt come here with common sense or else I'll just use his tag to show him!!!!
Yes you really are
 
lmao, I was especially never going to watch Wicked, because I even hate the books, so thanks TGO TGO
i'd recommend the author's first book, confessions of an ugly stepsister, which's very good. the rest are just subpar iterations of that book's premise...

edit: i'm wrong! wicked was published before stepsister. but i still think it's stepsister that gets it right...
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom