• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Your Top 5 Indie JRPG's

I haven't played a good one, these devs don't understand the genre, they only understand the structure and aesthetics. same with 95% of Metroid style games.

Actually, I have found generally 99% of indie games are terrible and largely gave up on them.
Which ones have you played?
 
1 - E33: rewarding combat

2- E33: mature plot

3- E33: no anime cringe fest galore

4- E33: good graphics

5- E33: Sephiroth + Dragon Slayer = Simon
Reducing JRPGs to just turn-based combat is silly. By that logic, Baldur's Gate 3 would be a JRPG too. The genre has its own distinct style, tone, storytelling sensibilities, and cultural identity that Expedition 33 simply doesn't have. It's a European turn-based RPG through and through.

The game also has a major publisher behind it (Kepler Interactive), a sizable budget, full voice acting, and very high production values. It's much closer to a AA title than what most people would typically consider indie.
 
Last edited:
lol its not JRPG and indie.
the dude your opinion GIF
 
"It's just your opinion" is usually what people say when they've run out of actual arguments but still want the last word.

JRPG isn't a synonym for turn-based game made anywhere on Earth. If it were, we might as well throw Baldur's Gate 3, Divinity, and half of western RPG history into the same bucket and call it a day. There are design traditions, pacing, narrative structure, and cultural roots involved.

And the indie label also isn't a vibes-based aesthetic choice. Once you've got a major publisher (Kepler Interactive), a sizeable team, full VO, cinematic presentation, and production values clearly aimed way above the small-scale indie space, calling it indie becomes more of a marketing fantasy than a useful classification.
 
Wouldn't say it's indie, but E33 is a JRPG, because it follows all the design concepts of a JRPG.

What's that you say? Someone who isn't Japanese can't make a JRPG?

Can a non-Belgian make Belgian waffles?
Can a non-French make French toast?
Can a non-Danish make a Danish pastry?
Can a non-Swiss make Swiss chocolate?
Can a non-Italian make Italian dressing?
Can a non-Scottish make a Scotch whisky?
Can a non-English make an English muffin?
Can a non-Austrian make a Viennese whirl?
Can a non-Turkish make Turkish delight?
Can a non-Turkish make Turkish coffee?
Can a non-Hawaiian make a Hawaiian pizza
Can a non-Jamaican make a Jamaican rum punch?
 
Last edited:
Wouldn't say it's indie, but E33 is a JRPG, because it follows all the design concepts of a JRPG.

What's that you say? Someone who isn't Japanese can't make a JRPG?

Can a non-Belgian make Belgian waffles?
Can a non-French person make French toast?
Can a non-Danish make a Danish pastry?
Can a non-Swiss make Swiss chocolate?
Can a non-Italian make Italian dressing?
Can a non-Scottish make a Scotch whisky
Can a non-English person make an English muffin?
Can a non-Austrian make a Viennese whirl?
Can a non-Turkish make Turkish delight?
Can a non-Turkish make Turkish coffee?
Can a non-Hawaiian make a Hawaiian pizza
Can a non-Jamaican make a Jamaican rum punch?
Yeah, that analogy really doesn't do what you think it does.

Nobody is arguing "only Japanese devs can make JRPGs" - that's a strawman. The point is that JRPG isn't a magical ingredient list where you just tick turn-based combat and voila, genre defined.

By that logic, we should probably start calling anything with dice rolls a D&D game and call it a day. Or just label every turn-based RPG a JRPG and retire the term entirely, since apparently nuance is optional.

And yes, food analogies are doing a lot of heavy lifting here… but unfortunately for them, game genres aren't cuisine recipes. They actually have design lineage, structure, and cultural context that matters.
 
"It's just your opinion" is usually what people say when they've run out of actual arguments but still want the last word.

JRPG isn't a synonym for turn-based game made anywhere on Earth. If it were, we might as well throw Baldur's Gate 3, Divinity, and half of western RPG history into the same bucket and call it a day. There are design traditions, pacing, narrative structure, and cultural roots involved.

And the indie label also isn't a vibes-based aesthetic choice. Once you've got a major publisher (Kepler Interactive), a sizeable team, full VO, cinematic presentation, and production values clearly aimed way above the small-scale indie space, calling it indie becomes more of a marketing fantasy than a useful classification.
yr5cHMFlTUdC6koX.jpg
 
we should probably start calling anything with dice rolls a D&D game and call it a day. Or just label every turn-based RPG a JRPG and retire the term entirely, since apparently nuance is optional.
Yeah, that analogy really doesn't do what you think it does.

Not all turn based games are JRPGs. I think most people know that?
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom