vicissitudes said:I don't think I want to see Jon Hamm in this, it will probably ruin Jon Hamm for me. Just can't see him in that costume and take him seriously.
By the time this movie comes out, Mad Men will be over.
vicissitudes said:I don't think I want to see Jon Hamm in this, it will probably ruin Jon Hamm for me. Just can't see him in that costume and take him seriously.
NYR said:This thread is gonna be fun when it's bumped when the movie turns out to be good because of mangod Nolan being involved.
See this as proof: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=110889
Warm Machine said:I think Tony Scott would have been a better choice. Michael Bay would have been the ultimate choice over all with his sense of glorious celebratory americana.
My concern with Synder is just the colour palette of the film.
Warm Machine said:I think Tony Scott would have been a better choice. Michael Bay would have been the ultimate choice over all with his sense of glorious celebratory americana.
My concern with Synder is just the colour palette of the film.
bathala said:Picturing jon hamm wearing superman tights :lol
i wonder if snyder is doing yet another comic book movie because he knows he's going to have three bombs in a row and needs the job security
jett said:If there's one thing I hope they do is redesign that fucking thing. No sacred cows Nolan, plz.
evil solrac v3.0 said:*sigh* what? black goo suit?
Discotheque said:I'm probably the only one who really liked the designs they had for the Tim Burton one. Though the story ideas were retarded such as having a 'gay robot sidekick' for the villain, the look from the concept art was incredible. Oh man :/
Anyways if this flops Superman is dead for at least 20 years.
jett said:Nah you're right they should keep the tights and the red inside out underpants.
SalsaShark said:really ?
evil solrac v3.0 said:yeah, they should. it's a superman movie. people don't seem to have a problem with batman having worn underwear outside his pants for 70 years too, why is it a problem with superman? you want to see a good movie or bitch?
jett said:Nah WB will release something or else they lose some rights to the character.
Blader5489 said:What? WB owns DC.
thekad said:Really. They're almost as bad as the Fallout birthers.
It's jett.
No, they have to pay x amount to the estates of Siegel and Schuster.jett said:Nah WB will release something or else they lose some rights to the character.
Discotheque said:Oh right I forgot about that. This is sad lol. You can tell neither Nolan OR WB give a shit about Superman since they're just handing it off to Snyder. And don't give me this confidence in Sucker Punch shit, his films have been bombing recently.
Superman's just a character they need to quickly throw some project onto since they don't really want to lose him hahaha. Oh well...one day somebody will care.
http://uncivilsociety.org/2008/03/a-siegel-superman-copyright-de.htmlDiscotheque said:And DC doesn't actually own the rights to Superman entirely apparently. The family of Siegel is always threatening to take it back.
Discotheque said:Oh right I forgot about that. This is sad lol. You can tell neither Nolan OR WB give a shit about Superman since they're just handing it off to Snyder. And don't give me this confidence in Sucker Punch shit, his films have been bombing recently.
Superman's just a character they need to quickly throw some project onto since they don't really want to lose him hahaha. Oh well...one day somebody will care.
Discotheque said:WTF is a jump-to-conclusions mat?
Solo said:You just copped to not seeing Office Space dude.
Discotheque said:WTF is a jump-to-conclusions mat?
Yeah, the internet is a bastion for people like me. It brings this out of us pretty easily. But yeah I'm definitely pretty positive this will suck. I've jumped to conclusions from past-experience of watching Snyder's crap.
Discotheque said:Yeah I know, it's been in my backlog for years now. And I've seen Idiocracy and Extract too. I'm doing it wrong fo sho.
evil solrac v3.0 said:yeah, they should. it's a superman movie. people don't seem to have a problem with batman having worn underwear outside his pants for 70 years too, why is it a problem with superman? you want to see a good movie or bitch?
jett said:Batman has no outisde underpants in Begins or TDK. I'm just saying that the character could use a redesign for a movie adaptation. Keeping red underpants isn't going to make it a good movie.
You either have never seen Superman or Superman II, or have bad taste. The original is the model by which other superhero movies are judged.black_13 said:It should be interesting. Out of all the final choices they had, Snyder is the best.
And really he can't do worse than all the previous Sup's movies.
Snyder's movies are hardly bombs- dissappointments maybe, but not bombs. Watchmen did fine for a niche Rated R comic that made little sense to the public (or a lot comic book readers) & WB probably breathed a sigh of relief for ever getting involved in it.Discotheque said:Taken from another forum, but it's so true:
my ass Snyder had some emotional attachment to this character. This is just him covering his ass because Sucker Punch will flop hard (after battle owls and watchmen).
PhoncipleBone said:You either have never seen Superman or Superman II, or have bad taste. The original is the model by which other superhero movies are judged.
Solo said:Im convinced there is no way to make Superman look cool. On Smallville they are now having him sport jeans and a red leather jacket :lol