Otakumegane
Member
Because it sold 3million at 39.99 and will continue to sell a million or so more.
Legs+Remake of one of the greatest games of all time.
Legs+Remake of one of the greatest games of all time.
Standard Nintendo greed. They have a limited market of hardcore fans that will buy their games no matter the cost.
MasterOfPuppets said:People are willing to buy at that price.
Standard Nintendo greed. They have a limited market of hardcore fans that will buy their games no matter the cost.
outunderthestars
He's not our sharpest knife.
(Today, 03:55 PM)
They don't need it to be in the NPD Top 10 for it to do well for them at this point.I find it hard to beleive that OOT is still selling very well.
It's an insult to OOT that infamous SS is the same price.
ISS should be half that price by now.
Yup. That limited, hardcore market is the only reason Mario Kart Wii sold 30+ million copies with no price drops.
One is a Zelda game and the best game of all time.
The other one isn't.
Do we have any numbers to back up the idea that a 3 year old port is still selling "substantive amounts" or are we just assuming so to justify the price?
And that casual/mass market consumer enjoyed the Nintendo experience so well that they have continued to propel the company to record sales over the last three years. Oh wait......
One is a timeless game, the other is not.
Huh weird, should be more expensive since it's that much better AND longer than Second Son
Because Nintendo. Can't find a good copy of SoulSilver for a good price anywhere!
- Less competition from third parties on Nintendo systems means price can remain high and still sell.
You do realize Nintendo games don't just compete with other games on Nintendo platforms, right? They compete for attention and dollars which are both multiplatform franchises (indeed, they are not even exclusive to the game industry!).
Standard Nintendo greed. They have a limited market of hardcore fans that will buy their games no matter the cost.
You do realize Nintendo games don't just compete with other games on Nintendo platforms, right? They compete for attention and dollars which are both multiplatform franchises (indeed, they are not even exclusive to the game industry!).
ignorant and slightly insulting answer. I can buy KIU for £12
would the people justifying the price with "because it's the greatest game of all time" also be willing to pay $39> (or whatever the launch price was) for super mario bros 3 in these troubled modern times?
So apparently Nintendo has to apologize for making good games that people are willing to buy full-price for 3+ years, while other companies are making games like infamous that devaluate quickly.
Nah, kidding, I get your point OP, games should be cheaper after a couple of years since their release.
I "had" to buy Kirby: Mass attack (DS) for 40 yesterday.
If they remade SMB3, yes? How is this a tricky question?would the people justifying the price with "because it's the greatest game of all time" also be willing to pay $39> (or whatever the launch price was) for super mario bros 3 in these troubled modern times?
Sarcasm?Standard Nintendo greed. They have a limited market of hardcore fans that will buy their games no matter the cost.
No, it means you should eventually lower the price of your games over time like every other company in every other market. But they can get away with it, just like MS was able to get away with charging for online for over a decade despite most people being against the idea. Just because it still sells doesn't mean it's pro-consumer.
Standard Nintendo greed. They have a limited market of hardcore fans that will buy their games no matter the cost.