What was the next logical step though? A Wii but in HD, with a continued focus purely on the Wiimote which wasn't often utilized to its potential even though the Wii itself was extremely popular?
As a Wii U owner, the Wii U as an HD system is more sophisticated than the Wii. It's more complex, where the Wii was a very basic system with limited features. The features of the Wii U are interesting and should be enticing. The controller, because of its touch screen, is very user-friendly (maybe as much as the Wii remote). Is tapping a screen any more complicated than pointing at the sensor bar? It's a different mechanism but it's not hard to figure out even for the most casual of users, especially considering the current tablet culture.
The product is weak in terms of specs and implementation of the OS (and updates), but I think Nintendo has a pretty strong foundation for both core and casual players here. And I'm saying this as someone who owns a Wii, X360, and now Wii U. The problems are definitely with the lack of a solid software lineup, third party support, and poor marketing. The Wii was flawed but it was extremely successful because of the appeal. I don't see exactly what's missing with the Wii U other than the fact that it's not, once again, extremely basic. If anyone took the time to learn and understand the features, they'd be totally on board. The problem is that, with the HD gaming era, complexity is a necessary evil, but just past the wall is a system and interface that is actually really easy to use.
Summary: the system should be enticing at its core based on what it offers as a step up from the Wii. Put me in the camp that believes the problems are [mostly] external.
Should be Mario instead of NintendoLand.
If they ditched the pro controller and made it $100 cheaper, it would be a lot more attractive.
What was the next logical step though? A Wii but in HD, with a continued focus purely on the Wiimote which wasn't often utilized to its potential even though the Wii itself was extremely popular?
As a Wii U owner, the Wii U as an HD system is more sophisticated than the Wii. It's more complex, where the Wii was a very basic system with limited features. The features of the Wii U are interesting and should be enticing. The controller, because of its touch screen, is very user-friendly (maybe as much as the Wii remote). Is tapping a screen any more complicated than pointing at the sensor bar? It's a different mechanism but it's not hard to figure out even for the most casual of users, especially considering the current tablet culture.
There's also Miiverse and a general sense of gaming community that the Wii lacked completely. We're in the social media age, so Facebook+Twitter+video games is a neat idea and it actually does work pretty well. Ask many Wii U owners and they'll say that Miiverse is a wonderful addition that expands the video game experience on Nintendo consoles.
The product is weak in terms of specs and implementation of the OS (and updates), but I think Nintendo has a pretty strong foundation for both core and casual players here. And I'm saying this as someone who owns a Wii, X360, and now Wii U. The problems are definitely with the lack of a solid software lineup, third party support, and poor marketing. The Wii was flawed but it was extremely successful because of pure accessibility. I don't see exactly what's missing with the Wii U other than the fact that it's not, once again, extremely basic. If anyone took the time to learn and understand the features, they'd be totally on board. The problem is that, with the HD gaming era, complexity is a necessary evil, but just past the wall is a system and interface that is actually really easy to use.
Summary: the system should be enticing at its core based on what it offers as a step up from the Wii. Put me in the camp that believes the problems are [mostly] external.
ZombiU is great. If you like survival horror you have to get this game.
Why would I want a pro controller? To play non existent 3rd party games?
And I tried really hard to care about zombie U but it just looks so boring. Anything zombie related is just too played out for me to care. My Wii U now going to collect dust for months to come thanks to Rayman delay
wait!! $70 off is not good enough?![]()
Added value does not work in America. Price is king here.
This will do nothing.
I assume the bundle is out there because Nintendo wants people to buy it. Price point plays a pretty big factor.This bundle isn't out there for its price point. If you want to spend less, buy a Basic unit.
It's to promote the Pro controller (provides a more familiar controller experience) and Zombi U, an exclusive not usually associated with the Nintendo name.
This bundle isn't out there for its price point. If you want to spend less, buy a Basic unit.
It's to promote the Pro controller (provides a more familiar controller experience) and Zombi U, an exclusive not usually associated with the Nintendo name.
If your statement were true then the Wii U Basic bundle would be the most popular and demanded SKU and it's clearly not (and wasn't during the launch/holiday period).
If they ditched the pro controller and made it $100 cheaper, it would be a lot more attractive.
If they want to promote the pro controller they can release a Wii U with just the pro controller, no Wii U pad. That will definitely drive the price below $250.
Nintendo has a major identity crisis when it comes to input devices. Stop giving consumers a dozen options and stick to ONE, just one.
Did people buy the deluxe version for nintendoland or because it had 4x the in-upgradable storage that the basic version had? That's like asking why someone purchased a 32GB iPhone over an 8GB iPhone. It's not for value, it's for the space.
So you're claiming that people bought the Premium Bundle for the 32GB of space over everything else that comes with it?
The Wii U is not an iPhone. Most people probably don't give a shit about how much space it comes with. Even if they do, 32GB is hardly that much if you're downloading a lot.
Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. It's the same reason that people buy more HDD equipped 360's than just flash equipped 360's.
You are on GAF, and this post is below our standards. At least explain why you feel like the game is crappy.
Considering the pad is the one controller you actually need, that'd actually be a terrible idea.If they want to promote the pro controller they can release a Wii U with just the pro controller, no Wii U pad. That will definitely drive the price below $250.
Nintendo has a major identity crisis when it comes to input devices. Stop giving consumers a dozen options and stick to ONE, just one.
Fixed.
I'm about 5 hours in and I'm almost too scared to continue lol.
Hey, there's Rayman Legends coming in a...Just bought a Wii U and this. Game seems kinda cool but I'm really, really underwhelmed by the Wii U itself. It takes an eternity to navigate the main menu. And asides from Wind Waker I don't want anything other games for it.I really should thought this through a little better.
Meh. I rather have a price drop than this.
Brilliant. I hope this translates into more support from Ubisoft.
Anybody touching this?
I was really looking forward to picking this up tomorrow, but those NPD numbers scared me pretty good. I'm now concerned about the longevity of the platform.
"Zombi U"--pack-in or portent?
Anybody touching this?
I was really looking forward to picking this up tomorrow, but those NPD numbers scared me pretty good. I'm now concerned about the longevity of the platform.
"Zombi U"--pack-in or portent?