lyre said:At least I don't lack a penis.
Joking aside, I still consider the 3d Mario games to be spinoffs of the 2d games especially now that both lines of Mario will have new entries from how on (hopefully), just like how some say the MMX series is a spinoff of the original games. In other words, one hasn't replaced the other, thus one is a spinoff.
However I can't really comment on RE4 since that style of play seem to have permanently replaced the classic style of RE gameplay.
Dali said:Wait, what? Mega Man X is a spinoff of the Mega Man series. Some people disagree with this? Didn't Mega Man 7 get released after the first Mega Man X game?
I think the "New" in the title of the handheld NSMB denotes that it is a spinoff. A spinoff that has its roots firmly planted in the original SMB games, but still a spinoff. Otherwise, instead of NSMB it would be called SMB [whatever number it's up to now]. NSMB is its own series now.
Spoit said:I'm suprised with all the mario kart and smash talk, no one's brought up SMG's relative bomba to Mario Party 8
In a way X is a spinoff but in others it's not. The X series takes everything that made the original games good, expanded upon it and added it's own flair; just like what a sequel is supposed to do, right? It's considered to be a spinoff, to me, is because it pretty much erases whatever story the original series had and replaces it with whatever it wanted to; barely a mention of the original series other than X was made by Dr. Light, Dr. Light's cameo appearances and robots are now common everyday sights instead of being special creatures.Dali said:Wait, what? Mega Man X is a spinoff of the Mega Man series. Some people disagree with this? Didn't Mega Man 7 get released after the first Mega Man X game?
I think the "New" in the title of the handheld NSMB denotes that it is a spinoff. A spinoff that has its roots firmly planted in the original SMB games, but still a spinoff. Otherwise, instead of NSMB it would be called SMB [whatever number it's up to now]. NSMB is its own series now.
What has the gameplay to do with RE4 being a spin-off or not, which it's not.lyre said:However I can't really comment on RE4 since that style of play seem to have permanently replaced the classic style of RE gameplay.
So would you say that Wizardry 8 is a spin-off of Wizardry 7, since the graphics changed from 2D to 3D?lyre said:Or even the 3d Mario games being spinoffs of the 2d Mario games.
Xzior said:*details details*
TJ Spyke said:Mega Man X is a subseries.
As long as you agree X is a spinoff.lyre said:In a way X is a spinoff but in others it's not. The X series takes everything that made the original games good, expanded upon it and added it's own flair; just like what a sequel is supposed to do, right? It's considered to be a spinoff, to me, is because it pretty much erases whatever story the original series had and replaces it with whatever it wanted to; barely a mention of the original series other than X was made by Dr. Light, Dr. Light's cameo appearances and robots are now common everyday sights instead of being special creatures.
And with that in mind, would you consider Megaman and Bass to be a spinoff or a sequel, since the game was often dubbed MM 8.5?
MisterHero said:Super Mario 64 sold 10+ million copies. With Sunshine we can attribute that to the GC's smaller userbase, but we have yet to see how Galaxy will perform in its lifetime, especially if the Wii keeps going like it is.
Half and half, but that's just splitting hairs now.Dali said:As long as you agree X is a spinoff.
The game takes place more or less immediately after the last game, a new evil overlord appears, 6 new bots appear, 2 make a return (Tenguman and Astroman), you can play as Bass, and, you guessed it, Wiley has something to do with it all and if he doesn't initially he'll make himself have something to do with it all. Sounds like a sequel ... but it's kinda not ... (?). :SI guess that depends on the official line from Capcom. I haven't played the game so I have no idea if the storyline is direct continuation of MM8 or really anything about it. Sonic and Knuckles is a direct sequel to Sonic 3 so that wouldn't be a spin-off, so I'd lean towards the saying the same about MM and Bass.
So would you consider MMnB to be a ... spinoff?Dali's edit said:MM and Bass might just be some side story. I usually just go by normal naming conventions unless it's painfully obvious that a game is part of a series' main line.
lyre said:The game takes place more or less immediately after the last game, a new evil overlord appears, 6 new bots appear, 2 make a return (Tenguman and Astroman), you can play as Bass, and, you guessed it, Wiley has something to do with it all and if he doesn't initially he'll make himself have something to do with it all. Sounds like a sequel ... but it's kinda not ... (?). :S
Immortal_Daemon said:It's called "Mystic Quest" on the SNES, and it was my first RPG ever. Oh the fond memories...
Dali said:Also known as a spin-off. Seriously, wtf people.
40 million as factual as that is (or even 18 million), is a very unfair standard to hold all the other games to. Especially when sequels now are expected to come out every year or every other year, not years apart as the Mario games are.jman2050 said:SMB sold 40 mil, SMB3 is at around ~18 mil even if you don't count rereleases, and NSMB looks to approach that mark in the future. I don't think Galaxy will approach any of those, as awesome as it is.
EDIT - also, the loose interpretations of the term 'spinoff' is really screwed up. Metroid Prime a spinoff series? Really?
Vice City and San Andreas are not really definitive 'spin-offs' but they aren't GTA IV&V either. Maybe the 'Stories' games could be considered spin-offs?Ashhong said:Vice City???
There is only one Phantasy Star series. That other is merely an abominable shell of what it tries to pretend to be.Dizzy said:What about Phantasy Star?
:lol Smart way to cover their ass.poppin fresh said:GBA -> DS
Third pillar right?