BumblebeeCody
Member
Yeah I love the Crash games. It really went on a mediocre spiral. At least he never went into full stupidity like Sonic (as much as I love and play all Sonic games), it's just Crash just faded away.
There's a lot of people here who seem uncapable to understand that some people may like some platformer more than any Mario. Shocking, right?
Wtf nope. Crash was famous as hell in Europe.
I'm sorry that this kind of ignorance forced you stop doing the retrospectives. They were wonderful to read and put a different perspective on the post ND games.I think the best thing for us excited about Crash's future and just platformers in general is do to this; leave this gaming forum when it comes to discussions about platformers. Because that is how I feel personally; so many here hate Crash and other 3D platformers, that their really is no point discussing them here anymore.
At least, that it what I been feeling the past few weeks and a huge reason I pulled the Crash Retrospective from NeoGaf & questing about posting future series of Retrospectives on this forum.
I'm sorry that this kind of ignorance forced you stop doing the retrospectives. They were wonderful to read and put a different perspective on the post ND games.
It literally blows that whenever someone here even mentions the two words, "CRASH BANDICOOT" you get this vocal group who seems to think that Crash is just some forgotten "90s attitude" character that no one cares about and that the games were terrible. And yet after the E3 announcement it's still going on.
Like, people are just fucking obnoxious and it's hard to have a decent conversation here when talking about the things you love and want to share.
makes me think that there has only really been 3 Playstation Mascots
Nathan Drake, Kratos and Crash
I wanted to avoid saying this, as I love the Mario games too, but yes, I'm in full agreement with you regarding this.
But it's true. I love Mario 64 but it did have a very bland and limited level design. That's not me bashing the game in anyway and in fact, you could argue it was intentional and therefore it was the games art style, but it still doesn't really have much of an impact on the game overall.dude lost me when he said Mario 64 was visually "nonsense" and "forgettable"
come on bro
I wanted to avoid saying this, as I love the Mario games too, but yes, I'm in full agreement with you regarding this.
My sackboy figurine is pissed
The first Crash looked like ass compared to Mario 64. The second Crash game improved on every area and is very crisp and nice looking even today, but it still is a small scale, oldschool platformer, whereas Mario 64 gave birth to a new generation and standard for platformers. Crash never looked impressive next to it and especially the N64 platformers that followed in Marios footprints.
Then what the fuck is Sonic then? That character is so dated that it fucking hurts and he's still not out of the 90s.
Ignorant shit like this pisses me off. Crash is more like a 1940s Roger Rabbit kind of cartoon character than some "Poochie" bullcrap.
Since when are video game characters not created to make good money during their time? Was Sonic was created in the 90s for the 2000s? Mario created in the 80s for the 2010s?
Sonic is also very, very dated (seriously look up how he was designed) and suffers the same problem Crash does (who was also inspired partly inspired by Sonic). And if you think they weren't pushing the rad/extreme angle with Crash during the 90's uhh I don't know what to say.
This. The rap battle minigame in Crash 2 was too much for me.
Sonic is also very, very dated (seriously look up how he was designed) and suffers the same problem Crash does (who was also inspired partly inspired by Sonic). And if you think they weren't pushing the rad/extreme angle with Crash during the 90's uhh I don't know what to say.
Sonic is also very, very dated (seriously look up how he was designed) and suffers the same problem Crash does (who was also inspired partly inspired by Sonic). And if you think they weren't pushing the rad/extreme angle with Crash during the 90's uhh I don't know what to say.
makes me think that there has only really been 3 Playstation Mascots
Nathan Drake, Kratos and Crash
Same sort of shit tainted Masters of Doom, no right thinking person would ever put Comander Keen anywhere near or over Super Mario.
I'd love to see a cross over game between God of War and Uncharted. Double the mass murdering mayhem.
Completely disagree.
Also, you're bringing up things that don't matter to the comparison of visuals, yes, SM64 is the superior game in gameplay, yes SM64 set the new standard for platformers, SM64 blew your mind because of the freedom of movement and 100% 3d gameplay and 3d exploration based level design, while crash lacked freedom and forced segments into specific camera angles. None of that has anything to do with visuals, that's gameplay, Crash looked way more advanced visually than SM64's painted polygons, very basic textures and abuse of sprites, but like, we didn't give a shit, those shortcuts SM64 is what allowed them to make the superior gameplay without straining the memory of the n64, while crash did the oposite (as explained in the video) restraining the gameplay and freedom as a trade off to build levels with better geometry and loading heavier textures.
Wow, that's incredible. I genuinely had no idea they were such big sellers.Ahem.
Sonic is also very, very dated (seriously look up how he was designed) and suffers the same problem Crash does (who was also inspired partly inspired by Sonic). And if you think they weren't pushing the rad/extreme angle with Crash during the 90's uhh I don't know what to say.
I have never owned a NES. Masters pretended like Keen was a contender when never was, it removed a ton of credibility from the writer.Unless they aren't blinded by console bias :V
If you're going by marketing then that's a whole different discussion.
If you actually played the games, he has none of those traits. If anything, Crash is more like a confused puppy than some "dated 90s" character as you call it.
If you're going by marketing then that's a whole different discussion.
If you actually played the games, he has none of those traits. If anything, Crash is more like a confused puppy than some "dated 90s" character as you call it. He's literally something straight out of a Tex Avery cartoon.
I don't understand are you saying...are you saying because Crash got to "extreme" he became less popular
but Sony's Icon for the PS2 era was this man
and he literally just had one of the largest reactions at E3 recently...
This... isn't a really good video. All this video really proves is that Naughty Dog is really good at what they do. Plus Crash was created in the 90s for the 90s. He's a dated entity.
FYI this is the same guy who thinks Sonic the Hedgehog should be made for adults
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6ak3ebBep0
That's a weird comparison considering, the PS2 had many icons, the last God of War game came out three years ago and "angry white dude" is still a widely used archetype when making a video game character. Has there been any other major games starring mascot character like Crash since the early 2000s?
Since when are video game characters not created to make good money during their time? Was Sonic was created in the 90s for the 2000s? Mario created in the 80s for the 2010s?
That's a weird comparison considering, the PS2 had many icons, the last God of War game came out three years ago and "angry white dude" is still a widely used archetype when making a video game character. Has there been any other major games starring mascot character like Crash since the early 2000s?
I've always thought of Kratos as black, tbh.
This... isn't a really good video. All this video really proves is that Naughty Dog is really good at what they do. Plus Crash was created in the 90s for the 90s. He's a dated entity.
FYI this is the same guy who thinks Sonic the Hedgehog should be made for adults
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6ak3ebBep0
If you're going by marketing then that's a whole different discussion.
If you actually played the games, he has none of those traits. If anything, Crash is more like a confused puppy than some "dated 90s" character as you call it. He's literally something straight out of a Tex Avery cartoon.
This has always been the impression I got from Crash within the original trilogy, and they really started selling it with his death animations. He's a goofy cartoon and not some radical dude doing kickflips and being edgy. I swear that the image people remember of Crash is entirely in his marketing, and maybe that's part of the problem.