1. Get in character: You or another member of your theatre troup must attend a hairdressing salon or barbershop of your choice and request a Robert Pattinson, providing your chosen hair stylist with appropriate reference material. We will require before and after (and preferably during) proof of the transformation.
2. Method Acting: You or another member of your theatre troup must spend the best part of your day with your shirt off in an effort to get inside the mind of renowned thespian Robert Patterson. You must supply photographic evidence of the different venues and situations you or your subject has practiced his or her craft. If the latter it might be a good idea to link and tag them as NWS.
3. Legal Issues: As has been demonstrated by a recent thread of a similar theme plays of this nature can run into legal issues. To futureproof your production from such a fate you must register an account on several Twilight fan boards informing them that your plans to improve child literacy by writing and performing a series of Shakespeare/Twilight plays in schools. However, Stephanie Meyer is not on board and you wish to convince her otherwise through the raw untamed power of the internet petetion. You must setup a petition on this or a similar site asking her to change her mind and convince at least fifty Twilight fans to sign it.
Bonus points if you can get any Twilight fan page, board or group to link directly to the petition on their actual pages in "news" or something.
You have until the weekend or everyone gets bored. Whatever comes first.
Audience Participation: An extra 12 hours probation on top of the ban for anyone else who wants to audition for this production.
...You almost got me here.watervengeance said:Thank god GAF Silver is free.
Why the fuck would I want to shell out money just to get a silly flag in my tag.
The Faceless Master said::lol :lol :lol crazy!
sometimes i think "wow GAF has really strict moderation" and you mean to say it's even stricter there AND costs $10?
diddlyD said:i'd never pay for forum access.
i wish they'd just hire someone who knew what they were doing to configure the neogaf server. i visit forums that get way more traffic then this one that don't shit themselves every time 50-100 people try to access it simultaneously, and they even support search.
diddlyDEviLore said:Time to head to those forums, then.
FatalT said:It doesn't get much stricter than GAF, where the rules can change in the flick of an eye. Just say something negative about the forum and you're gone. This has been proven in this very thread even! Think again when you say Something Awful's moderation is "more strict" than GAF's. You don't see Lowtax banning people for talking about SA's search function having problems here and there or the site loading slowly occasionally.
Relix said:I would pay $10 one time. Without thinking.
This isn't a democracy tsk tsk
i love that about GAF. Every single post makes it feel like you are playing Dragons Lair or a Sierra Adventure game. GAF Quest IV!FatalT said:It doesn't get much stricter than GAF, where the rules can change in the flick of an eye.
GhostRidah said:I would pay for gaf just to get rid of the 500 error, where do I sing up?
koam said:Internet should be free
FatalT said:I'm glad you feel that way about an internet forum that relies on the opinions and discussions of its users to stay alive.
I agree that LF has solved problems but the history of D&D in relation to trolling has more than a few chapters. And the overall concept of enforced rigor extends beyond D&D; most of the Arts forums are equally controlled to some extent and the benefits should be obvious. But the underlying financial punishment can't be discounted, since it's what provides teeth to bans, probations, and the incentive to take idiocy into the forums meant for that.Stumpokapow said:While it's true than D&D is a consistently high quality forum, the existence of LF as a "pressure release" for D&D threads has done much more to keep the quality of posts up than the entrance fee has.
Flash-back to, say, 2002-2003 and D&D was of a very high quality like you describe but there were much more troll posts and idiots.
Agree again, I'm just using it as an example of how GAF could transition and maintain the current user base.Also while the grandfathering thing worked for SA, SA had relatively few accounts grandfathered in. I've had an account there for, uh, I guess ten years this month, and the forums there have been much larger since 2004-2005 than they were when the fee was brought in.
Hitokage said:Bad news, guys. Even if a limited number of people use vb's search, the mere fact that it's enabled and indexing posts causes resource drain.
Another thing I forgot to mention was the mod challenges over at SA. Oh man, are those fun. :lolThe Faceless Master said::lol :lol :lol crazy!
sometimes i think "wow GAF has really strict moderation" and you mean to say it's even stricter there AND costs $10?
I've had an account for over a decade. I've had my avatar changed on me twice; once by some dimwit who couldn't even do it right, and then by some other mystery person (possibly a mod) who changed it to what they thought my job was (aka friendly change). Never been banned. It's easy to not get banned, just don't post the first thing that comes to your mind.OMG Aero said:I've thought about paying for an SA account a few times now since I get a lot of enjoyment out of just lurking the forums (Particularly the Let's Play one) but I've heard of people getting banned from there just because they were in a bad mood which is something I wouldn't want if I was paying for an account.
I'm also not a fan of the fact that someone can pay to change your avatar.
FatalT said:I agree. I hate having to pay for Netflix to stream movies. I hate having to pay for digital music downloads. I hate having to pay for games on Steam. We should just get all that for free, bandwidth be damned!
koam said:That's not the internet, those are products sold via the internet. That actual internet, i.e webpages, should be free. Ads are welcomed.
FatalT said:A discussion board is not a webpage though, now is it?
A discussion board, a wikipedia-type site, a search engine...etc. These could all be "products" and services able to be sold on the internet. Hopefully this will never be the case but you never know what the future holds for us.
Druz said:I supported $10 lifetime donating earlier in this thread but I forgot to mention one thing...
searching would have to make a return. Or at least, "Find Users Posts" My reply rate is down to like 10% because I can't find where I made posts. Sorting through 50 pages just to see if someone answered my question/comment is insane and don't tell me to use google search because it's bullshit.
diddlyD said:i'd never pay for forum access.
i wish they'd just hire someone who knew what they were doing to configure the neogaf server. i visit forums that get way more traffic then this one that don't shit themselves every time 50-100 people try to access it simultaneously, and they even support search.
I can't believe people get by without this. 90% of my gaffing is done through User CP. Been that way for like five years now.DJ_Tet said:In your options you can set it to automatically Subscribe to topics that you reply in. Set the responses to 'none' otherwise you will get an email for every response.
Then when you come back to gaf later you can click Subscriptions at the top and just read the threads that have responses since your last post.
It sucks not being able to access a user's post history, but between subs and google I can accomplish pretty much everything else that I used to do with search.
edit: of course this won't retroactively make your old threads/posts available. It will only work once you turn it on going forward.
Don't you own/run the site? How do you feel about requiring a one-time payment?EviLore said:Time to head to those forums, then.
Hitokage said:Bad news, guys. Even if a limited number of people use vb's search, the mere fact that it's enabled and indexing posts causes resource drain.
Bluth said:How the hell did this deserve a ban? Fuck that.
Bluth said:How the hell did this deserve a ban? Fuck that.
VGChampion said:You can't tell me the popular pay to post sites don't have profits that the owners aren't pocketing.
Don't you own/run the site? How do you feel about requiring a one-time payment?
EviLore said:Since when are subscription-based websites by definition not for profit?
*shrug*
I only let new people into GAF like one batch every six months as it is. A lot of frustrated people waiting on the outside would probably welcome it. If it ever happened it'd be to address the overflow of new members, not particularly as a revenue generator.
A fund raiser for WHAT? You act as if GAF doesn't have ads and make significant money from the revenue. Do you think Evilore is homeless or something? What the hell is wrong with you?evil solrac v3.0 said:I'll give you $100 a year, no questions asked.
edit: in all seriousness, I think an annual fund-raiser style drive wouldn't be such a bad idea.
BamYouHaveAids said:A fund raiser for WHAT? You act as if GAF doesn't have ads and make significant money from the revenue. Do you think Evilore is homeless or something? What the hell is wrong with you?
evil solrac v3.0 said:I want search function and be able to find my previous posts. and yes, I know how well off evilore is you numb nuts, I don't think the off-topic forum should be shut off for E3.
What about letting us (members) donate? I also miss the search functionEviLore said:Since when are subscription-based websites by definition not for profit?
*shrug*
I only let new people into GAF like one batch every six months as it is. A lot of frustrated people waiting on the outside would probably welcome it. If it ever happened it'd be to address the overflow of new members, not particularly as a revenue generator.
evil solrac v3.0 said:I want search function and be able to find my previous posts. and yes, I know how well off evilore is you numb nuts, I don't think the off-topic forum should be shut off for E3.
Just delete the autocomplete entry and then manually retype the url, it'll show up normally then (that's of course if you even want to get rid of the 500 error, in some ways it's GAFs own tag)Javaman said:I got a 500 error the first time I visited GAF with Firefox and now it's stuck in the name of the autocomplete. :lol