James Sawyer Ford
Member
I'll reserve judgment until I see the trailer, but looks like I was right about KZ:SF...that game looks significantly better than BF4 visually (although to be fair BF4 is supposedly running at 60 frames)
Lots of birds=Next Gen?
I'll reserve judgment until I see the trailer, but looks like I was right about KZ:SF...that game looks significantly better than BF4 visually (although to be fair BF4 is supposedly running at 60 frames)
I'll reserve judgment until I see the trailer, but looks like I was right about KZ:SF...that game looks significantly better than BF4 visually (although to be fair BF4 is supposedly running at 60 frames)
That's from the movie FACE OFF... if I'm correct , no?
Pretty meta bro.
TR looks good on PC, but hair aside, all the textures were last gen, the lighting was last gen....Star Wars 1313 blew it away. BF4 can't compare head to head with Crysis 3 in terms of tech features. You have to remember BF4 is a multiplayer shooter with 64 players, vehicles, destruction and other complex things...Crysis 3 has none of that.
I'll reserve judgment until I see the trailer, but looks like I was right about KZ:SF...that game looks significantly better than BF4 visually (although to be fair BF4 is supposedly running at 60 frames)
HD birds man, HD
Actually the only thing that makes KZ look better is the city. (so far)
Character models, lightning etc didn't look any better. Comparisons will make sense as soon as we see a city.
Really? I think KZ looks great indeed but I dunno, this seems more detailed in the character models. KZ looked a little muddy on clothing etc.
But it is comparing two games that will change before release and if BF3 and KZ2 are anything to go by, they will look worse by launch.
The lighting looks better to me (the reflective surfaces on KZ:SF were crazy)
I think the character models are about equal in both (not quite that impressive). KZ:SF wins on sheer size and activity of the levels.
It's very hard to judge without seeing BF4 in motion though, a lot of KZ:SF's effects are really pronounced in motion.
The reflective surfaces are all fake. There isn't any real dynamic true reflections like in C3 or TR.
-M
The lighting looks better to me (the reflective surfaces on KZ:SF were crazy)
I think the character models are about equal in both (not quite that impressive). KZ:SF wins on sheer size and activity of the levels. The city shots looked like CG to me.
It's very hard to judge without seeing BF4 in motion though, a lot of KZ:SF's effects are really pronounced in motion.
I better hope those faces are placeholders. Like I said... Very rough and cartoony.
But compared to the PS3 games... It's a step up.
Uhhh... Crysis 3 is built for PS3/360 and has better faces. That has nothing to do with it.
KZSF currently has the worst facial models out of the bunch.
Everything is "fake" when it comes to graphics, so I don't really buy that argument. What matters is the visual impact.
Faces look similar to the shots from BF4...they're not impressive.
The woman in that shot looks like she is made of plastic.
What matters is how 'close" you can get to realism. Fake reflections have been done before and is easy to implement. Real reflections is next-gen.
Is it true they are not using Frostbite 2 as their engine? If so what are they using?
So do the dudes in the BF4 shots
Frostbite 3
I wonder if this black guy has some form of vitiligo or why does he have those white blotches on his face? It's especially noticeable around his eye. Maybe it's just a weird graphical effect.
I know, it does look weird. I think it is because that we don't seeing like that. It is only affect to camera.I wonder if this black guy has some form of vitiligo or why does he have those white blotches on his face? It's especially noticeable around his eye. Maybe it's just a weird graphical effect.
Oh wow that was a quick turn around time! I was expecting Frostbite 2 to be like UE3 and Cryengine 3 and be around for a while
I better hope those faces are placeholders. Like I said... Very rough and cartoony.
But compared to the PS3 games... It's a step up.
So do the dudes in the BF4 shots
Again, you don't need to have dynamic reflective mapping for it to look real.
This looks insanely impressive to me. On a macro level, Killzone: SF delivers.
Although I agree with some complaints that when the action gets more intimate, the visual impact loses its luster.
It's... just light refraction on sweated skin?I wonder if this black guy has some form of vitiligo or why does he have those white blotches on his face? It's especially noticeable around his eye. Maybe it's just a weird graphical effect.
I wonder if this black guy has some form of vitiligo or why does he have those white blotches on his face? It's especially noticeable around his eye. Maybe it's just a weird graphical effect.
Let's hope the game actually looks like that at launch. My money bets it won't though
Weird graphical glitch or facepaint.
Until I see a Killzone running on PS4 hardware or videos captured from the retail version I am wary of Sony's KZ demo. Sony's bullshot videos from previous console announcements have shown they flat out lie to look good. I hope it KZ: SF looks that good at launch, but seeing is believing.This looks insanely impressive to me. On a macro level, Killzone: SF delivers.
Although I agree with some complaints that when the action gets more intimate, the visual impact loses its luster.
that weapon in the ego view has a weird scope on the side. it seems like a failure or i am just stupid.
Until I see a Killzone running on PS4 hardware or videos captured from the retail version I am wary of Sony's KZ demo. Sony's bullshot videos from previous console announcements have shown they flat out lie to look good. I hope it KZ: SF looks that good at launch, but seeing is believing.
Speaking of KZ, they need to hire some better VO actors for SF. Killzone 3's were terrible.
PlayStation 4 Demo of Killzone: Shadow FallUntil I see a Killzone running on PS4 hardware or videos captured from the retail version I am wary of Sony's KZ demo. Sony's bullshot videos from previous console announcements have shown they flat out lie to look good. I hope it KZ: SF looks that good at launch, but seeing is believing.
Speaking of KZ, they need to hire some better VO actors for SF. Killzone 3's were terrible.
REVIVE +100
BIRD KILLED +10
BIRD KILL ASSIST +5
Hey we should all have a graphics war about which of these 3 games look better, even though 2 of them aren't even out yet!!
Until I see a Killzone running on PS4 hardware or videos captured from the retail version I am wary of Sony's KZ demo. Sony's bullshot videos from previous console announcements have shown they flat out lie to look good. I hope it KZ: SF looks that good at launch, but seeing is believing.
Speaking of KZ, they need to hire some better VO actors for SF. Killzone 3's were terrible.
Ah, thank you... It still looks stupid and i just probably overthink too much.not sure what picture you're talking about, but if its the one I think then you rotate the gun 45 degrees to switch between scope and iron sights
FOWL PLAY + 200
lol, he is looking out of the window, its supposed to be the sunlight reflecting
Its it me, doesn't look as good as Crysis 3 on high?
Target renders are totally different. Sony's never done what you're accusing them of right now which is fake a playable demo on stage and on a late night talk show.
Can't unsee, goddamnit.I wonder if this black guy has some form of vitiligo or why does he have those white blotches on his face? It's especially noticeable around his eye. Maybe it's just a weird graphical effect.
Let's hope the game actually looks like that at launch. My money bets it won't though
Wait, you really think that KZ:SF footage is fake? They were playing it live and recorded it from a PS4 dev kit during the unveiling.
They even appeared on Jimmy Fallon playing the game live.
There was no CG trickery there.
Yeah I knew they were actual demos. To clarify I didn't mean they were CG like the KZ2 video, but weren't the demos shown running on a PC? Who knows what hardware was in there. Or was the PC theory debunked?
Thank goodness for common sense. I facepalmed at the question you responded to.
Also, via twitter - http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=xb4iJFRS4Mw (crappy quality)