Because A) Large dogs still have utility
Here's my Pitbull-mix that's 75% Pitbull.
Look at the terror!:
Here's my Pitbull-mix that's 75% Pitbull.
Look at the terror!:
What utility? I grew up in a crofting community with lots of border collies about that were used as working sheep dogs and I'd make exceptions for working dogs and even for (very strictly regulated guard dogs), but what utility does a Doberman/Rottweiler/bull-Staffordshire terrier in a domestic setting serve exactly?
looks like he has some retriever in him.
Yeah, apparently the last 25% is Labrador Retriever.The other 25% must be something with pretty long legs! Very tall for a pit bull. Beautiful dog.
What utility? I grew up in a crofting community with lots of border collies about that were used as working sheep dogs and I'd make exceptions for working dogs and even for (very strictly regulated guard dogs), but what utility does a Doberman/Rottweiler/bull-Staffordshire terrier in a domestic setting serve exactly?
The snout gives it away. That's a beautiful chocolate color, so uniform.Yeah, apparently the last 25% is Labrador Retriever.
Thanks!
Well according to Wikipedia 30 people in the us were killed by dogs in 2015. If we restricted ownership to small breeds I expect that number would massively reduce. No one needs a larger dog. I'm not advocating to ban them all just the big ones. Why not just get a small breed?
So you're saying smaller dogs can't do as much harm as larger dogs?
Yeah.....I would say that's a pretty safe bet.
There are pitbull service dogs. They do everything from leading the blind, to helping disabled vets, to working with autistic children to calm them down. Small dogs are not fit for these tasks. For example, service dogs for austic children are trained to smother the child when it begins to show signs of stress - being smothered helps them calm down. You need a bigger dog to do this.
Hmm I'm sure that these roles can be performed by breeds that aren't associated with fatal attacks.
Hmm I'm sure that these roles can be performed by breeds that aren't associated with fatal attacks. But if bull terriers are the breed best suited to these roles, id be fine with a limited number of them being owned by people for whom no breed other than a bull terrier can perform the role of guide dog for the blind etc..
You clearly aren't internalizing anything anybody says in this thread. Like arguing with a brick wall.
So are you suggesting that only bull terriers can perform these roles or do you accept that there are other breeds that don't have the same association with fatal/serious attacks that are better suited?
What in this context would my responses look like if I was 'internalizing' what people were saying? I don't think I'm understand what you are trying to say here.
Hmm I'm sure that these roles can be performed by breeds that aren't associated with fatal attacks. But if bull terriers are the breed best suited to these roles, id be fine with a limited number of them being owned by people for whom no breed other than a bull terrier can perform the role of guide dog for the blind etc..
Why are you so dense?
What are your arbitrary reason that you want less of a breed?
People are going to keep choosing the breed they want as long as they can legally and feasibly own them.
No need for permission from Macleoid on Neogaf.
So I'd just ban all dogs over a certain size except working dogs.
Pit bulls are genetically predisposed to dog aggression
So I'd just ban all dogs over a certain size except working dogs.
I don't feel it is arbitrary. There are a certain set of breeds associated with fatal/serious attacks. But breed is not the firmest/clearest defined thing. So I'd just ban all dogs over a certain size except working dogs.
Pit bulls are genetically predisposed to dog aggression so it takes a lot of conditioning to make sure they don't snap one day. So I could see why some places would ban them because the average person won't be able to handle this. Most pit bulls I've met have tried to attack my friendly Corgi so I'm always wary of them
So.. the entire gene line is spoiled and had a hive mind to attack babies. So.
Even though they are ranked in the ukc for being family companions.
I don't think owners of Dalmatians are recommended to buy break sticks to release a dog from its lockjaw grip, but OKnot any more so than Dalmatians.
Pit bulls are genetically predisposed to dog aggression so it takes a lot of conditioning to make sure they don't snap one day. So I could see why some places would ban them because the average person won't be able to handle this. Most pit bulls I've met have tried to attack my friendly Corgi so I'm always wary of them
What has been pointed out to you several times, that you are willfully ignoring, is that the pitbull breed is not "associated with fatal attacks." Shitty owners are, and shitty owners can use any breed in shitty ways.
http://komonews.com/news/local/vicious-chihuahua-terrorizing-wenatchee-children
You would stop responding if you took these comments and internalized them. Because your dream of destroying an entire breed of dog is sociopathic and rooted in ignorance.
You can wallow in your own ignorance if you like, but stop spreading such blatantly false horseshit to the rest of us, please.Pit bulls are genetically predisposed to dog aggression so it takes a lot of conditioning to make sure they don't snap one day.
Are you just intimidated by size, because why are you so fixated on size?
Do you want to put down this 132 pound dog to stop your nightmares?
I don't think owners of Dalmatians are recommended to buy break sticks to release a dog from its lockjaw grip, but OK
I don't think owners of Dalmatians are recommended to buy break sticks to release a dog from its lockjaw grip, but OK
MYTH: Pit Bulls have locking jaws.
Reality: Pit Bulls do not have any special physical mechanism or enzyme that allows them to lock their jaws. If you compare a Pit Bull skull to a skull of any other dog breed, you can see with the naked eye that both skulls share the same characteristics and general bone structure. However, one personality trait of the Pit Bull breed is determination. Whatever Pit Bulls do, they do it with a great deal of enthusiasm, and it is this trait that can make it seem like they have a locking jaw when they bite down on something and are determined not to release it.
I think you may have mis-understood me. I don't want to destroy one breed of dog, I'd like to get rid of all dogs bigger than an average (small) cat unless liscensed as a working dog.
Edit: just saw the post regarding breeding population to get viable candidates and I guess I could live with an exception to allow Labrador retrievers with an option to reconsider if the prove troublesome. I imagine that armed forces would keep a live stock of the types of dogs they need and similarly law enforcement. These days I doubt it would be hard for police in the uk to liaise between authorities and with european counterparts to keep a good stock of the types of dog they need. The same would be true of farmers etc.
I'm pretty sure I'm saying what everyone else is though? Pit bulls have the potential to be great dogs if the owner is good and a knows how to properly train and condition a dog. Pit bulls need extra care due to the purpose the breed was originally meant fulfill. Like my how my corgi tried to herd people until I trained it not too, pit bulls need to be trained to chill out around dogs with extra care. Every pit bull owner that I know corroborates thisYou can wallow in your own ignorance if you like, but stop spreading such blatantly false horseshit to the rest of us, please.
I don't think owners of Dalmatians are recommended to buy break sticks to release a dog from its lockjaw grip, but OK
So are you suggesting that only bull terriers can perform these roles or do you accept that there are other breeds that don't have the same association with fatal/serious attacks that are better suited?
What in this context would my responses look like if I was 'internalizing' what people were saying? I don't think I'm understand what you are trying to say here.
I don't feel it is arbitrary. There are a certain set of breeds associated with fatal/serious attacks. But breed is not the firmest/clearest defined thing. So I'd just ban all dogs over a certain size except working dogs.
In 2005, in the wake of disturbing dog attacks, Ontario passed a law designed to permanently remove pit bulls — and dogs that looked like them — from the province.
The law stopped short of a total ban, at least in the short term, but went some distance in that direction. Under the law, four breeds (pit bull terriers, American Staffordshire terriers, Staffordshire bull terriers and American pit bull terriers) had to be kept muzzled or leashed in public and sterilized within two months of the bill’s passage.
It also became illegal to import them into the province. The four breeds are often referred to together as ‘pit bulls’.
“Over time, it will mean fewer pit bull attacks and, overall, fewer attacks by dangerous dogs,” then-attorney general Michael Bryant told the Ontario legislature in 2005.
The law certainly succeeded in cutting bites by the four affected breeds — Toronto recorded only 19 in 2014, down from 112 in 2005.
It’s not surprising, since there are far fewer of them around to bite anyone — there were only 338 registered in Toronto in 2014, down from 1,411 in 2005. Also, since the dogs were supposed to be unable to breed starting in 2005, the remaining ones are becoming elderly. Gradually, they are dying off without being replaced. They should cease to exist in the city by 2020 or so, at least in theory.
That isn’t airtight — the Toronto Humane Society still sees the occasional pit bull puppy come in to its shelter, says spokesperson Tegan Buckingham.
What it hasn’t succeeded in doing is reducing the total number of dog bites (though it looked that way for a time). Toronto’s reported dog bites have been rising since 2012, and in 2013 and 2014 reached their highest levels this century, even as pit bulls and similar dogs neared local extinction.
By 2012, the Ontario Veterinary Medical Association estimated that the law had led to over 1,000 dogs and puppies in Ontario having been needlessly put down.
I'm pretty sure I'm saying what everyone else is though? Pit bulls have the potential to be great dogs if the owner is good and a knows how to properly train and condition a dog. Pit bulls need extra care due to the purpose the breed was originally meant fulfill. Like my how my corgi tried to herd people until I trained it not too, pit bulls need to be trained to chill out around dogs with extra care. Every pit bull owner that I know corroborates this
http://www.wptv.com/news/region-c-p...t-bull-saved-her-from-being-seriously-injured
hurr but I thought we were avoiding dogs associated with attacks.
Hey why don't you google pit bull attacks and post the all the links?
Hey why don't you google pit bull attacks and post the all the links?
There's literally no way you're this dense, especially with as much people actually trying to talk to you.
Nice troll fam.