maniac-kun
Member
Why would they take the video down if it was fake?
There are changes. Even in these blurry ass shots you can see more detail in the distance as well as slightly more detail in the textures like rocks and grass.I can't detect any changes whatsoever. I think it's just the lighting that's giving you the impression of alerted detail.
Edit: Ah, you were joking.
Exactly.Why would they take the video down if it was fake?
Wait, Take 2 Games?
Not Take Two Interactive?
Welp, it's dead Jim.
That's using a surprisingly low amount of VRAM for the settings that are used. Hell, I don't even thing GTA4 on PC was that efficient.
Hopefully no Social Club.
This video was of course fake. The gameplay footage was taken from here :-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8O4G2yWBwiE
Scroll to 1:40 in that video and you will see the footage again (minus all the pretend PC stuff they inserted).
This video was of course fake. The gameplay footage was taken from here :-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8O4G2yWBwiE
Scroll to 1:40 in that video and you will see the footage again (minus all the pretend PC stuff they inserted).
This video was of course fake. The gameplay footage was taken from here :-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8O4G2yWBwiE
Scroll to 1:40 in that video and you will see the footage again (minus all the pretend PC stuff they inserted).
What. Have you seen GTA V? One of the best looking games of last gen? You cray pal. That shit was sorcery.1 GB seems pretty reasonable for a game that looks as bad as GTAV.
Still, why was it taken down.
What. Have you seen GTA V? One of the best looking games of last gen? You cray pal. That shit was sorcery.
What. Have you seen GTA V? One of the best looking games of last gen? You cray pal. That shit was sorcery.
because it was fake?Still, why was it taken down.
This video was of course fake. The gameplay footage was taken from here :-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8O4G2yWBwiE
Scroll to 1:40 in that video and you will see the footage again (minus all the pretend PC stuff they inserted).
One of the better looking games on console. Game is far from impressive coming from a PC standpoint.
Don't get me wrong, very impressive for an open-world console game. Unless they do something, which they likely won't, the PC visuals will be quite unimpressive. Modders will pick up the slack of course.
I think it's real guys.
.This video was of course fake. The gameplay footage was taken from here :-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8O4G2yWBwiE
Scroll to 1:40 in that video and you will see the footage again (minus all the pretend PC stuff they inserted).
I think it's real guys.
because it was fake?
1 GB seems pretty reasonable for a game that looks as bad as GTAV.
Damn, Charlie is on that detective work
people are still letting wishful thinking get in the way of logic I see.or maybe Take Two was in total panic and thought someone leaked their upcoming secret PC port and tried to take the before even checking it out to see it was fake...
If you expect the PC version of this game to occupy 1gb of vram looking the same as in consoles then you'd better stay far, far away from this port.
Wait, what?
Alas whilst I would like to take the credit for finding this, it wasn't me that pointed this out. It was actually a user called Bonnano over on GTA Forums that found the original video. I am merely reposting the info here.
http://gtaforums.com/topic/673430-gta-v-pc-version-discussion/?p=1064519478
Word of advice if you decide to visit the PC topic on GTAForums please brace yourself for a cesspit of hell. The PC topic makes a kindergarten look like a place of intellectual discussion.
The fake is so good that Rockstar was fooled that it was really leaked from the PC version they are actually working on, hence taking the video down.
Catalyst profiles have been up to two or three months out of the full game being released. They've also been several months late, so whatever.Apparently GTA V profile is back in new AMD Drivers
http://www.guru3d.com/files_details/amd_catalyst_13_30_beta_(13_300_january_8).html
http://gtaforums.com/topic/673430-gta-v-pc-version-discussion/page-110
There are changes. Even in these blurry ass shots you can see more detail in the distance as well as slightly more detail in the textures like rocks and grass.
Not saying it's real. But there are small differences.
One of the better looking games on console. Game is far from impressive coming from a PC standpoint.
Don't get me wrong, very impressive for an open-world console game. Unless they do something, which they likely won't, the PC visuals will be quite unimpressive. Modders will pick up the slack of course.
your sanity ?