Dead Man Typing
Member
EDIT: Bah. Poster's remorse.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Resident Evil 5 - Xbox 360 vs PS3 Demos Comparison
- Thread starter Aquanox
- Start date
WickedLaharl
Member
RSTEIN said:
not at all. the framerate often takes a dive in the ps3 demo. especially when you play assembly.
Projectjustice
Banned
360 has a sharper image. Its not that big of a difference though. Now which one runs the best is a more important question.
It doesn't really though. And I've brought evidence!Mr. Pointy said:
People with a keen eye might have noticed that the AA turns off at times in the PS3 demo. Some folks at B3D speculated that the engine probably does this so it doesn't drop frames. Anyway, I caught a shot of this and managed to come away with a near identical frame set with AA on and off. You can see how the QAA blurs SOMEWHAT, but its not really super bad. The real culprit (I assume, since these arent HD) is the capture method used for these shots. Its either S-Video, or Component. Both of which use the analog out on PS3, which is really terrible compared to the 360.
QAA on:
QAA off:
Mr. Pointy
Member
It's like this. If you've only got one system, just get RE5 for that, as it looks great either way.
If you've got both, you have to pick between whether you want a sharper image and more detail at the expense of tearing, or less jaggies and better colours at the expense of slowdown.
If you've got both, you have to pick between whether you want a sharper image and more detail at the expense of tearing, or less jaggies and better colours at the expense of slowdown.
Francias Castiglione
Banned
xabre said:
Especially when the camera isn't moving!
m0dus said:"for all intensive purposes?"
I don't suppose you actually mean . . 'for all Intents and purposes'
Ah, internet. destroying the english language one precious letter at a time . . .
It's a bit of a running joke on GAF.
CitizenCope
Member
360 is a beast!
dreamer3kx
Member
What do you mean??CitizenCope said:
badcrumble
Member
the retail build is likely going to look significantly better on both systems because this demo is pretty fucking old, this comparison is not in any way something to base your purchase on. people should do it based on which set of friends they want to play through it cooperatively with.Mr. Pointy said:
Chû Totoro
Member
I'm getting why there is some final version comparison threads but why comparing demos ?
They may not be on the same version of the game. There is most of time different teams and different plannings for two versions of one game.
They may not be on the same version of the game. There is most of time different teams and different plannings for two versions of one game.
360 version looks sharper and more detailed texture-wise, but someone else did this for the JPN demos before which I guess are the same since they already had 4 languages built in or so...
What's new to me is the framerate problems I've been reading about in the PS3 RE5...
What's new to me is the framerate problems I've been reading about in the PS3 RE5...
They are the same. Well, somewhat. The 360 version has some audio files removed in the US demo, but the ps3 versions are all 1:1 with each other.Skilotonn said:
Here you are also seeing one of the interesting "bugs" on the 360 with the Framework engine. It must be an ATI card optimization or something, cause I saw something similar with some old PC video card shoot outs. Anyway, it seems to have really harsh mipmap transitions. So stuff in the background, which should be blurred, isnt. Take his glasses for example. They are crystal clear, razor sharp, while the area around his head isn't. I also pointed this out during a DMC4 comparison, with a jester monster, or whatever it was.Aquanox said:
Skilotonn said:
Texture resolution is identical but the image rendering is slightly softer on PS3. I doubt this is even perceptible on a TV, let alone when in motion.
I played the demo on PS3 about 10 times last night. I don't recall any obvious or even remotely annoying framerate dips.
lastendconductor
Put your snobby liquids into my mouth!
Why did you post every pic twice.
tinfoilhatman
all of my posts are my avatar
I'm guessing they are running at slightly different resolutions(and the PS3 upscaling is crap as usual) The 360 version looks just slightly sharper not a big deal as long as they can iron out the suposed frame rate issues on PS3.
Look at the skin details, their better on the 360 although the brightness\contrast level on the PS3 could just be hiding the details.
Look at the skin details, their better on the 360 although the brightness\contrast level on the PS3 could just be hiding the details.
dreamer3kx
Member
Haunted said:
how does it look "much better", I dont see it, they look exactly the same, in a couple of shots the 360 has a bit darker colors but thats all i see.
Angelus Errare
Banned
http://kotaku.com/5112949/resident-evil-5-co+op-event-part-the-second-the-new-stuff
Again, old as hell. You people are about to get worked up over nothing. Regardless, I say this will get to 251 pages.
Again, old as hell. You people are about to get worked up over nothing. Regardless, I say this will get to 251 pages.
Haunted said:
In looks it is a bit better, but the framerate chugging/added jags are a deal breaker and a review out of Europe says the framerate issues remain in the review copy.
Angelus Errare said:
Framerate issues still remain in the review copy. No clue on the jags, but if I had to guess it will be the same.
dreamer3kx
Member
Haunted said:
Im happy
I dunno, Im running the PS3 demo and it looks WAY sharper and more detailed than whats shown in these screens. Maybe the settings on my tv are perfect for this game, or maybe its the way the OP captured the screens but its definately not representative of what I played. Whatever, in the end its framerate that matters anyway.
Similar threads
- Poll