What?Onix said:Yeah, this turned into a 'recommend me an audiophile setup to connect to my PC' thread.
What?Onix said:Yeah, this turned into a 'recommend me an audiophile setup to connect to my PC' thread.
Shiggie said:What?
ok, what i got are Analysis Plus Clear Ovals. I didn't wanna spend a grand on cables, but didn't wanna completely cheap out either. They cost about $160 for 18 feet length.Winged Creature said:oh and just out curiosity what speaker cabling did you get OP, it doesnt seem like standard cabling
i know, i know, signals will pass through a metal conductor with ease and all the resistive and capacitive losses at this residential level length will be negligible. but they are very well engineered, sturdy and have fantastic terminals.are you fucking kidding me?
giga said:As for a passive set, the Paradigm Atom v.3 look good, but I'd need an amp. (which means more money) Another problem with this route is that they are discontinued.
so is the markertek house brand stuffnitewulf said:i know, i know, signals will pass through a metal conductor with ease and all the resistive and capacitive losses at this residential level length will be negligible. but they are very well engineered, sturdy and have fantastic terminals.
Witchfinder General said:I'm also contemplating this:
Dynaudio Confidence C1
Dare I, GAF?
Gallbaro said:I have never heard the things but I instantly distrust anything "audiophile" when they spent money on a design team.
Gallbaro said:I have never heard the things but I instantly distrust anything "audiophile" when they spent money on a design team.
srst said:Are M-Audio speakers any good?
http://www.m-audio.com/products/en_us/StudiophileAV40.html
Miroku said:Vandersteen owner?
Witchfinder General said:If you read up on them the aesthetic result of the speaker is due to strict sonic principles.
Basically, form follows function.
dynaudios? without a second thought. without a second thought. after the break in period, my speakers are putting out sound that i've previously only dreamed about. source files are uncompressed of course...female vocals just sorta float in the air somewhere. and bass taps, or drums make a slow rumble. it hits the back of your head.Witchfinder General said:I'm also contemplating this:
Dynaudio Confidence C1
Dare I, GAF?
Gallbaro said:No I have a couple of 15 year old JBL reference speakers that I got off of a friend who use to own a recording studio. Not the most precise but the best I could manage.
With the art deco I refuse to believe this.
"The cabinet features a forward mounted high-density baffle that offers extremely low-resonance and decouples the drivers from the main cabinet itself," according to Mike Manousselis, Vice-President of Sales & Marketing for Dynaudio North America. "The baffle itself employs a sandwich-style of construction with separate 40 mm and 16 mm thick MDF layers, which are then fused and bonded to the main cabinet body."
What then is the reasoning behind the lantern-like shape of the baffle, the narrow yet deeply ported configuration of the main speaker cabinet, and the positioning of the tweeter below the mid/woofer?
"Well," Manousselis explains, "by using the external baffle, it affords us the opportunity to employ a larger mid/woofer than such a narrow cabinet would otherwise be able to accommodate. We typically refer to our 17cm diameter mid/woofers as a 6.5 inch designs and the 28 mm diameter tweeters as 1.1 inch designs, but I guess that all depends upon how one rounds up to the nearest increments of inchesthe metric measurements are exact though. Likewise, the manner in which we taper the baffle allows us to minimize those extraneous reflections and distortions that larger baffles introduce into the sonic equation, which as you are aware, can have a deleterious effect on imaging. Furthermore, a solid aluminum module is integrated directly into the baffle, which in turn is where the tweeter is mountedto further isolate it from those potential colorations and vibrations that would ordinarily be introduced into the sonic equation by such close proximity to the mid/woofer.
"The cabinet design allows the speaker to be as narrow as possible at the point where we position the tweeter which significantly decreases high frequency diffraction. The use of a separate baffle, with its uniquely tapered shape, allows for the cabinet to be effectively wider at the point where the mid/woofer is positioned without adversely effecting the tweeter's diffractive properties. The inverted driver array is a technique Dynaudio has effectively employed in designs utilizing its most advanced transducers. The inverted array essentially offers a physical correction for the time arrival of higherS25 Shown with Stand2 frequencies by placing the tweeter at a path further from the ear. The secondary benefit is that low frequencies do not suffer the effects of early reflections and room induced colorations that such close proximity to the floor boundary would induce. We found that we were able to achieve a much cleaner, more natural bass response as the woofer was raised off of the floor."
nitewulf said:dynaudios? without a second thought. without a second thought. after the break in period, my speakers are putting out sound that i've previously only dreamed about. source files are uncompressed of course...female vocals just sorta float in the air somewhere. and bass taps, or drums make a slow rumble. it hits the back of your head.
dynaudios by nature seem to be polite though, IIRC, you're a metal head, so audition before you buy dyns.
as for the plinius amp, i've been looking into them and they seem to be excellent for the money. im looking for a tube integrated though...cause i dont think i can give up the tube warmth after getting used to it. however, i could still use the decco pre-amp section and then go for a solid state plinius amp or something. down the line though...
uh huh, i have been eye-ing the 9200 actually...either that or save up some money and go for a used mcintosh MC2102, that would be perfect for my tastes.Witchfinder General said:Plinius and Dyns go together very well (I also sell Plinius) and you might want to consider the 9200 integrated amp.
My only concern is my listening room: It's fucking tiny. My Focal Electra 1007BE, whilst excellent, aren't suited to the room. Besides, they've become a little fatiguing to listen to and whilst they are amazing for Metal they're not that great with other genres.
I'll probably try to demo a pair of the C1s in my room for a few days before I decide.
This sounds like what I'm looking for a magic box that plugs into my computer and makes the sound better. :lol Thanks for the suggestions and keep em coming! Gonna check out some reviews now...nitewulf said:DACs are digital to analog converters, a DAC will use the digital format from your PC/iPod directly and convert it to analog for amplification. You need a nice tube or solid state DAC/headphone amp package.
you need something like this:
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0017JHYJI/?tag=neogaf0e-20
or you could go for a tube amp like these:
http://www.pacificvalve.us/Headphones.html
Bada is a chinese brand that basically knocks off classic western designs...and they are well made. Lot of hi-fi gear are being made in china nowadays with western quality control (for consumers here obviously), so they are pretty great for the money.
but dont go off buying something right away, let others chime in here and read a lot of reviews!
nitewulf said:Upgraded my system. Basically the Dyns were very power hungry and the 50wpc Decco was just not cutting it, it was putting out very good sound at moderate levels...but whenever I tried to listen at louder levels, to increase the sound-stage, it'd cut out. So now I'm using the Decco as a pre-amp, and I got the Mcintosh MC-252 power amplifier driving the Dyns. I also made my own silver interconnects...which was pretty fun to do. I used to be a DIY kid, but had given up tinkering around a while back...so it was very fun to make myself some high quality interconnects. They make a shitload of difference...I was playing the Mcintosh through regular A/V cables so far...and the sound was tiny, brittle and really harsh. My interconnects already sound a lot smoother, they are supposed to get a lot better as they break in. We'll see...
the Mcintosh set me back about $3000. dude, i don't know what your budget is, but i'd suggest getting a used Meridian G57 200wpc power amp from audiogon. that particular model is going for ~$1200-$1600 bucks there. unbelievably good sounding amp. while i was in the market for a power amp, the dealer offered me his demo unit for $4000 bucks...and i almost considered it. it sounds soooo good. he demo-ed it w/ fantastic speakers, but they wouldn't sound good if the amp didn't drive them well. New retail price is $5000. but audiogon listings usually go for sub $2000...i suspect mostly because people don't really recognize the brand as much.Winged Creature said:wow you ended up going hardcore, how much did the mcintosh set you back?? Beautiful stuff, hopefully i'll be able to go the power amp route, maybe after i upgrade the speakers i can use my integrated as a pre-amp
zhenming said:If youre on a $100 budget get these.... SOOO GOODDD!!!!.gif
-sound is good
-look is good
-price is good
-goods made in china
BudokaiMR2 said:This is a good time to ask a question I had been wondering about.
I have a 5.1 Denon setup that I use for gaming on my 360 and PS3. I hook both up with the digital optical cable and it sounds amazing(especially the PS3 on certain games).
I also use the speakers with my macbook pro hooked up through the headphone jack to the back of my reciever. Is there anyway to get better sound through my laptop or is that best way?
nitewulf said:I used to be a DIY kid, but had given up tinkering around a while back...so it was very fun to make myself some high quality interconnects. They make a shitload of difference...I was playing the Mcintosh through regular A/V cables so far...and the sound was tiny, brittle and really harsh. My interconnects already sound a lot smoother, they are supposed to get a lot better as they break in. We'll see...
pre-amp to amp interconnect quality does affect the audio quality. its pretty clear to hear the differences. its also easy to explain why...pj325is said:Don't be one of those dudes, bro. Cables don't break in, and any difference you heard was imagined, unless something was SERIOUSLY wrong with the cables you had. Like super serious.
nitewulf said:*shrugs*
simple fact is, hi-fidelity revealing gear will sound nasty with weak links on the chain. you have to always balance the gear. if i play 128kpbs mp3s on my system...you will vomit. if i play them on a $100 system, they'll sound pretty good.
no...i used the 128kbps mp3 as an example of a weak chain.KHarvey16 said:But understand that the wires are not the reason for that. There is no quantifiable difference.
nitewulf said:no...i used the 128kbps mp3 as an example of a weak chain.
low quality wires to high quality amp will sound bad because the amp will just be amplifying a degraded...oh never mind, i am just "hearing" things.
nitewulf said:pre-amp to amp interconnect quality does affect the audio quality. its pretty clear to hear the differences. its also easy to explain why...
ideally you want no loss of signal between the pre-amp and amp, anything in that path will cause signal degradation, however little. but of course you have to connect the pre-amp to the amp. the more devices you have in this path, the more signal degradations you'll have. the first device is the RCA connector, then the wire itself, and then the other RCA connector. they are all lossy. i'm strictly talking engineering here, nothing else. when you use $5 L/R RCAs from radio shak, yes the signal will pass through, but there will be a massive loss in quality. basically the interconnect between the pre-amp and amp is a limiting factor, no matter how good your power amp is, it'll only be able to amplify the signal that's passed to it, and shoddy connectors and thin stranded copper cables aren't the best way to pass the signal.
usually with low quality cables, the sound will be harsh and tinny, muffled. yet again, i feel like i am going into odd territories and being "that guy" by spouting these adjectives...i'd much rather give an actual demo to people, the differences in quality are very easy to tell apart. one will sound harsh and hit your ear, the bass will not be as hard hitting or tight, the other will have sweet, toned highs, deep, tightly controlled bass, and so forth.
pj325is said:The headphone jack on a MBP is also an optical connection, get one of these:
http://www.monoprice.com/products/p...d=1022902&p_id=1557&seq=1&format=1#largeimage
pj325is said:"lossy" and "engineering" don't go together. What is it losing, specifically? I consider myself well versed in electronics so don't be afraid of going over my head.
pj325is said:There's a lot of marketing money behind snake oil products in the audiophile industry, most disgustingly with cables. It's amazing what people pay for things like optical cables or hdmi cables that cannot physically be better than the $5 shit from monoprice. Power cables, interconnects and speaker wire are all just as bad.
pj325is said:The biggest problem with debunking these things is that the placebo effect is strong and your brain might be interpreting the sound differently because it expects it to be different. I would better every dollar I have that if you had someone setup a blind comparison for you with monoprice cables and whatever cables you have, you would not be able to tell which is which at a higher rate than just guessing.