DCharlie said:At least in a worst case scenario the Lost Odyssey story would be new
But most likely not even a fraction as good or touching people like the FF7 story does (mainly because it's damn good but also because of nostalgia reasons).
DCharlie said:At least in a worst case scenario the Lost Odyssey story would be new
But most likely not even a fraction as good or touching people like the FF7 story does (mainly because it's damn good but also because of nostalgia reasons).
Sorry, I must be missing the connect here. This is the exact part of LO which we haven't even seen yet, so how can you compare? What we are comparing is the graphics and basic battle system. In that respect, LO is exactly the same as standard FF. Attack / Magic / Item / Defend. The locations and the way you move around them and interact with them are all very FF-like too. We don't know what the system will be, so why talk about that part?Bebpo said:That's it. You're now official batshit insane.
Besides FFIII, which you loved, that of course didn't try anything new because it was a remake, all the FFs this gen have been full of inovation. From the Sphere Grid in FFX to the Non-linear mission structure of FFX-2, to FFXI WHICH IS A HUGE DEPATURE, to FFXII which took FFXI's base and made an even bigger depature from traditional FF.
How can you say FFIII lacked depth and innovation when it was the first game in the series with the ability to change jobs mid-game? It was a first for many things, but you are comparing it to today's FFs. That's just wrong.I don't know how deep LO will be so I'm not going to comment on it, but the lack of depth and innovation is what killed FFIII for me. I want dozens of unique character stat development systems, new game structure systems, new battle systems, etc...that's what makes the games fun to play and keeps the genre from feeling repetitive.
There's nothing retro about LO. And we can't comment on the full depth of the system. All we have to play with at the moment is a couple of simple battles, much like the beginning of every FF game.Like someone else said, only DQ is allowed to be retro/simple/shallow because the nostalgia aspect of it is part of its charm.
Error2k4 said:yeah bebpo forgets ff3 is a remake of an old game seems like he just wanted a completely different game.
Speevy said:Everyone just get Blue Dragon and stop arguing about LO.
Speevy said:Everyone just get Blue Dragon and stop arguing about LO.
Well, I dunno, I did say like any recent FF I wasn't really counting FFIII in that sentence, and I don't see how FF has evolved much since VII. Obviously XII was a big change, thanks to its MMO roots, but besides that X was pretty similar to VII and VIII.Bebpo said:Uh, Jonny...I wasn't commenting on LO. I said as much. That was all a response to your "FFs haven't evolved at all" comment, which I find to be ludicrous.
Seriously? Is it at least different from DQ's Tension?Jonnyram said:john, that's nothing. Did you know BD has "Tension"?
john tv said:Seriously? Is it at least different from DQ's Tension?
seriously I mean the initial showing of the game has been poor
DCharlie said:it has? i thought everyone was jizzing over the phasing from CG to realtime graphics?
But didn't that last for less than a day before more objective minds thought it was pretty poor? I thought it was pretty goofy when I first saw it, and especially disliked all the standing around, waiting for a turn to attack.DCharlie said:it has? i thought everyone was jizzing over the phasing from CG to realtime graphics?
DCharlie said:it has? i thought everyone was jizzing over the phasing from CG to realtime graphics?
damn straight i'm crazy 360! initial showing of the game has been poor, i'm not denying that. is there some reading comprehension difficulty with the general populace of this board? i just said it reminded me of a regular ff game. logic be damned!nelsonroyale said:wow, johnyram is crazy 360.....seriously I mean the initial showing of the game has been poor....this doesnt mean the game wont turn out good....its commenting on the current state of the game, which seems little remarkable....
DCharlie said:interesting, well, i guess i'll find out in a few hours.
Jonnyram said:mushy peas
Jonnyram said:mushy peas
nelsonroyale said:Im sure youd eat it if ms was servingjkeh same effect rats
Jonnyram said:You forgot to say "peace"
Francias Castiglione said:The over riding logic seems to be that PS3 games can get better with more development time, 360 games will stay exactly as they are when first shown despite what the devs say.
The problem is the game design, not the graphics. They need to change complety the way that the game plays when you explore the map if they want it feel "next gen" instead of "PS1" (I like a lot the PS1 RPGs but I expected more).Francias Castiglione said:The over riding logic seems to be that PS3 games can get better with more development time, 360 games will stay exactly as they are when first shown despite what the devs say.
Sakaguchi already said that the battle system wasn't complete, and was especially missing 2 key elements.Doom_Bringer said:I don't think time will help this. The core gameplay just looks archaic. Like I said in the other thread, next gen graphics and gameplay from 1990 don't mix. They should have made this an action RPG or come up with a new battle system
Blimblim said:Sakaguchi already said that the battle system wasn't complete, and was especially missing 2 key elements.
duckroll said:This would be a good time to dig up the GAF thread(s) on the FFXII demo released with DQ8. That's what happens when people play a demo with everything but the most basic gameplay mechanics stripped out. :lol
Let's hope for an improvementBlimblim said:Sakaguchi already said that the battle system wasn't complete, and was especially missing 2 key elements.
Francias Castiglione said::lol Hypocrisy? Here? NO!
Doom_Bringer said:What he is trying to say is people thought that demo sucked and FF12 would inevitably suck
Francias Castiglione said:I know, and I bet some of those people now realise that FFXII is obviously not best represented by the demo. Yet they still treat Lost Odyssey as though this early demo represents the whole game.
Francias Castiglione said:I know, and I bet some of those people now realise that FFXII is obviously not best represented by the demo. Yet they still treat Lost Odyssey as though this early demo represents the whole game.
duckroll said:It's really sad because MS is handing this demo out like it's the second coming in Japan. Every Core Set they're selling starting today come with a Lost Odyssey demo, and the demo disc is in every issue of Weekly Famitsu on sale this week. I really don't think this is the kind of demo you want to show off at this stage of development.
duckroll said:
Yep.Amir0x said:that's...just CG, right?
Blimblim said:Yep.
duckroll said: