• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Titanfall Beta runs at native ’792p’ resolution on Xbox One, may increase with final

Yeah, optimisation can get the game from 55fps to 60.

Going from 798p to 900p is a rebuild, not the kind of things you do between a beta and the relase.

There's the 8% GPU reservation to get released too don't forget - not present for the beta.

edit: apparently not coming until Autumn.
 

tassletine

Member
When the xbone can't even run the emperors new clothes at 60fps it's extremely worrying. This game looks current gen in both graphics and gameplay.

The whole thing looks extremely average. It's like the developers were so scared of altering their aging formula they've changed almost nothing apart from the weapons.
 

Jack cw

Member
When the xbone can't even run the emperors new clothes at 60fps it's extremely worrying. This game looks current gen in both graphics and gameplay.

The whole thing looks extremely average. It's like the developers were so scared of altering their aging formula they've changed almost nothing apart from the weapons.

I still dont get why its so hard for any dev to run a FPS on xbone in 1080p? Not even asking for 60fps but neither BF4, CoD Ghosts and Titanfall are even close to that resolution and framerate. I know the differences in ROPs, CUs and general power, but I start to think that the tiny ESRAM and DDR3 are the bigger problem.
 

DeweyChat

Banned
Yeah I rebuild the games on my PC every time I change the resolution.

You're hilarious.

Increasing the resolution this much impllies not only small optimizations, even 8% of GPU is not sufficent, they'll need at least to get rid off the MSAA 2X and I frankly don't believe it..
 

keuja

Member
I think a better way to put it is that the XB1 has 66% of the power of the PS4. Another way would be that the PS4 is 50% faster than the Xbox 1. Saying 33% slower is kind of strange.

Edit: basically my point is that you have to be clear since the percentages are relative therefore you should base your less than/more than percentages both relative to either the PS4 or the XB1 instead of one number relative to the ps4 and the other relative to the xb1

It's obvious that when he says "33% slower", he's implying "33% slower than the PS4". Your post doesn't make sense.
 
It's obvious that when he says "33% slower", he's implying "33% slower than the PS4". Your post doesn't make sense.

I know I was just thinking about it and realized it doesn't make sense. Deleted that explanation part but I do believe saying 66% of PS4 is less confusing than stating two percentages.
 
playing games, for me, is far more important than resolution etc
much ado about nothing
game on!

want a really good game, with high resolution?
try Zork.. its as good as your imagination can make it


I bought two copies of the game for my One




Every day we have plenty of opportunities to get angry, stressed or offended. But what you're doing when you indulge these negative emotions is giving something outside yourself power over your happiness. You can choose to not let little things upset you.
 

EGM1966

Member
I dont get it ...the game doesnt look anywhere nearly as good to justify that shit resolution 60fps or not.. are the new consoles really that underpowerd?

Ignorning the consoles for a moment evaluating a game's performance should include the software as well. We know Respawn took Source as a basis from Valve then hacked into it mightly - did they do a good job? Is the code actually not well optimized right now? How well does it leverage XB1 specific architecture?

Sure the noted weaker SDK on XB1 will have an impact but early titles often the software quality is an issue too in terms of being optimized and tuned to the max for the platform.

Seems to me Respawn have focused on 60fps as a target more than resolution as well as gameplay and have then looked to see how much they can push resolution up with optimization. Given the MP nature of the title I'd expect on-going patches and improvements down the line.
 

ekim

Member
You're hilarious.

Increasing the resolution this much impllies not only small optimizations, even 8% of GPU is not sufficent, they'll need at least to get rid off the MSAA 2X and I frankly don't believe it..

what? Going from 791p to 900p is not a large increase in resolution - of course you can achieve that with SDK updates and optimizations.
 

MMaRsu

Banned
playing games, for me, is far more important than resolution etc
much ado about nothing
game on!

want a really good game, with high resolution?
try Zork.. its as good as your imagination can make it


I bought two copies of the game for my One




Every day we have plenty of opportunities to get angry, stressed or offended. But what you're doing when you indulge these negative emotions is giving something outside yourself power over your happiness. You can choose to not let little things upset you.

Lol!!! This is about a 500 dollar/euro box not being capable of full hd. this has nothing to do with gameplay. nobody here said the game isnt fun.
 

daniels

Member
Ignorning the consoles for a moment evaluating a game's performance should include the software as well. We know Respawn took Source as a basis from Valve then hacked into it mightly - did they do a good job? Is the code actually not well optimized right now? How well does it leverage XB1 specific architecture?

Why should i care what software they used? I am the consumer and i decide that if this is what passes as next gen then its a small jump and no reason to switch to next gen anytime soon.
 

Xbudz

Member
All I know I am going to run this 420p if you get what I mean

PEACE.
xXX-killerw33d420-XXx


57cnAlp.jpg

Xbudz LIVE
 

Chobel

Member
what? Going from 791p to 900p is not a large increase in resolution - of course you can achieve that with SDK updates and optimizations.

It's 29% increase in resolution. SDK updates and optimization usually can't achieve this, at least not in a short time.
 

Jack cw

Member
It's 29% increase in resolution. SDK updates and optimization usually can't achieve this, at least not in a short time.

This is very true. The game has problems with framerate and they are going to fix that first. Increasing the pixelfillrate and resolution by 30% would bring the code down to mid 30fps.
 
playing games, for me, is far more important than resolution etc
much ado about nothing
game on!

want a really good game, with high resolution?
try Zork.. its as good as your imagination can make it


I bought two copies of the game for my One




Every day we have plenty of opportunities to get angry, stressed or offended. But what you're doing when you indulge these negative emotions is giving something outside yourself power over your happiness. You can choose to not let little things upset you.

hey hey
hey hey
smoke weed everyday
 
Every day we have plenty of opportunities to get angry, stressed or offended. But what you're doing when you indulge these negative emotions is giving something outside yourself power over your happiness. You can choose to not let little things upset you.

I like to feel emotions naturally and not try to artificially force myself to feel in a positive manner simply to maintain an existence in a perpetually "happy" state that is not real.

That being said Titanfall not being up to snuff graphically is disappointing more than anything else. Why would I be mad, stressed or offended about this?

And lol at yet another post in a thread whose entire purpose is the discussion of the resolution that serves to say gameplay is all that matters why are we talking about resolutions, guys? Uh it's a thread on resolution so yeah...
 
I dont get it ...the game doesnt look anywhere nearly as good to justify that shit resolution 60fps or not.. are the new consoles really that underpowerd?

Cross gen game, small team, early in the next gen...

Add to that, some controversial points, that I let you judge on your own : xbox one's so called limited hardware, it's esram being a bottleneck and the drivers and api's not being fully optimised or available yet.

That's a lot to add up of course.

I sitll want to see the game running on PC on final build but I doubt it will really shine in the graphics departement. The art direction is also severly lacking (but that is a very personal complain).

Hope to get in the beta. Still looks very fun to play and I'm bored of Hawken, I want more pew pew and wallrides.
 
Am I the only one who thinks the graphics look great?

Nope. I've downloaded a few direct feed videos of the Xbox One version and it looks just fine to me. Obviously the graphics and or resolution could be much better but you can say that about any game. Having fun is what matters most. And that's coming from someone with a ~5 teraflop PC.

Still, when I was a kid your in game character was literally a square so I may have a slightly different outlook on things than some people :)
 

Teletraan1

Banned
So it's stupid to be a Laker fan still? I'll never stop rooting for my purple and gold. Just because they're not the best now doesn't mean they're still not entertaining at times.

Oh well. I'm still on the side that competition brings out the best in others.

I think XBOX is just tanking this gen so they can get a first overall pick from AMD next time and get better hardware.
 
Where did you get that? famousmortimer said it isn't coming at least until Fall.

Source? I thought everything pointed to it being part of the March update. He did say the Party replacment isn't coming until Fall, though.

Do we know if the textures in the Beta have improved from the "25%" in the Alpha? Also, how big is the Beta download?

All the footage shows better textures than before.
 

RetroStu

Banned
I still dont get why its so hard for any dev to run a FPS on xbone in 1080p? Not even asking for 60fps but neither BF4, CoD Ghosts and Titanfall are even close to that resolution and framerate. I know the differences in ROPs, CUs and general power, but I start to think that the tiny ESRAM and DDR3 are the bigger problem.

I'm pretty sure the X1 could run all those games at 1080p if they were 30fps and not 60fps.
 
Top Bottom