what is beyond the visibility diameter?
I know questions with no answers but they keep bugging me >_<
what is beyond the visibility diameter??
This won't ever get any better. In fact, it will get worse.the arrows in this pic
what is beyond the visibility diameter??
This won't ever get any better. In fact, it will get worse.
Is the rest of the universe definitely expanding faster then the speed of light?
Space and matter more than 13.7 billion light years away.
They should. If we had all the answers, there'd be no drive to find out the particulars. We can't prove undeniably that the universe started in a big explosion, but all the evidence seems to point in that direction. We can't say how big the universe is, exactly, but all the evidence points to it being bigger.
And this is why more scientists are needed. Because there are a lot of really annoying questions that need to be answered and not nearly enough people to answer them.
I still don't understand how it accidentally the whole thing
Is the rest of the universe definitely expanding faster then the speed of light?
what if what we call "the observable universe" is some kind of a microscopic experiment of some scientists in another layer of the universe and we are just a result of some scientists that produced this big bang inside a massive container that holds the universe as we now it?
All this subjects sound important and interesting but my brain is too primitive to really get what the hell it all means, what i find really mind blowing is how people like Einstein or other brilliant minds basically "guessed" or deducted so much shit from nothing, i can't wrap my head around that.
I wonder if the fact that we exist in the era of galaxies biases our predictions of what the next stage is (expansion, heat death, etc). Could there be forces that haven't even come into play yet on scales we can't imagine? Imagine being an observer in any of those other eras, could that observer predict everything that came after based merely on observation and scientific method? The timescale of eras increases exponentially, but how long that time seems to us is just relative to how we experience it. In the universal sense, could this era just be another one that blinks by in a procession of infinitely longer line?Looking at the bing bang timelines for the first few seconds/minutes is incredibly fascinating; when the first few subatomic particles formed, unreal.
I wonder if the fact that we exist in the era of galaxies biases our predictions of what the next stage is (expansion, heat death, etc). Could there be forces that haven't even come into play yet on scales we can't imagine? Imagine being an observer in any of those other eras, could that observer predict everything that came after based merely on observation and scientific method? The timescale of eras increases exponentially, but how long that time seems to us is just relative to how we experience it. In the universal sense, could this era just be another one that blinks by in a procession of infinitely longer line?
All I know is if Black Holes grow, then maybe universe expands and then crunches. Resulting in a big bang.
BH x ∞ = BB = Time is a flat circle.
JWST website is really digestible, check it out if you haven't.Really cool stuff. I think about what the James Webb Space Telescope could uncover and my brain hurts more than it already does.
The density of matter in the Universe is not high enough to overcome the speed at which it is expanding. A big crunch scenario is unfortunately unlikely, despite how poetically satisfying it may be.
I know, it's just fun to consider. I have to think that existing at the time point we exist in gives us some observational bias, but I could be wrong.we can only draw conclusions from observable evidence
Humanity will never find closure.
I know, it's just fun to consider. I have to think that existing at the time point we exist in gives us some observational bias, but I could be wrong.
I hope we figure all this shit out before I die. I don't wanna leave this place without knowing.
You could live to be 2000 and still never know everything.
Haha, well we definitely will in 3 billion years or so when the sun expands out to our orbit.
I smell a hero's call.
Go punch that sun, right in the kisser.
I know, it's just fun to consider. I have to think that existing at the time point we exist in gives us some observational bias, but I could be wrong.
Is the rest of the universe definitely expanding faster then the speed of light?
what is your take regarding the form of the universe?
on the one hand, if the universe were, (let's just say) round and a single entity, like earth, then multi-universes would have to be a truth since there can not be "nothing on the other side".
As long as there is a space (distance) interval of any dimension, being small or big, the universe we know continues.
but on the other hand, an absolute infinite universe..... HOW?? my brain starts to melt there.
I think the answer is in the numbers, they are infinite and we humans just have to deal with it,
Wouldn't it be possible to faster than light if we where going directly at a black holes gravitational pull?
Wouldn't it be possible to faster than light if we where going directly at a black holes gravitational pull?
Wouldn't it be possible to faster than light if we where going directly at a black holes gravitational pull?
Of course. .. scientists ponder if a future race could make the same leaps in science we have once other galaxies are no longer observable
He helped write the paper on "why the quantum mechanics theory is stupid and smells", also known as "Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? "
Which lead to the EPR Paradox (the E is for Einstein).
Which lead to Bell's theorem. Turns out Einstein was right in attacking quantum theory in his paper.
It just so happens that reality is fucking crazy.
I wonder if the fact that we exist in the era of galaxies biases our predictions of what the next stage is (expansion, heat death, etc). Could there be forces that haven't even come into play yet on scales we can't imagine? Imagine being an observer in any of those other eras, could that observer predict everything that came after based merely on observation and scientific method? The timescale of eras increases exponentially, but how long that time seems to us is just relative to how we experience it. In the universal sense, could this era just be another one that blinks by in a procession of infinitely longer line?
Haha, well we definitely will in 3 billion years or so when the sun expands out to our orbit.
How do we know there was only 1 big bang? And that they ain't more happening right now... far far away?
How do we know there was only 1 big bang? And that they ain't more happening right now... far far away?
And you've now stumbled into multiverse theory.
Intelligent life forms living at a latter time may not even be able to come to the same conclusions as us:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=sUH77mYBUtM#t=2819
Supposedly, the Sun will cook us long before that happens.
How do we know there was only 1 big bang? And that they ain't more happening right now... far far away?
the big bang is cool and all, I can somehow wrap my head around it but what was BEFORE the Big Bang? was there 100% Dark Matter???
and what caused the creation of the energetic materials that then exploded and created the Big Bang? where do they come from?
what if what we call "the observable universe" is some kind of a microscopic experiment of some scientists in another layer of the universe and we are just a result of some scientists that produced this big bang inside a massive container that holds the universe as we now it?
the picture shows that we are like in some kind of deliberated process that evolves constantly.