Hitokiri03
Member
Can someone point out whats wrong with Sony making the no DRM thing a PR stuff?
Yikes, this is awkward.
Hope we'll learn from Col's game so that we can support him once it comes out. Best wishes to him and his family.
Woah, just started reading and Fm is banned?
What's this about ps4nodrm being a stunt? Any proof to this?
Woah, just started reading and Fm is banned?
What's this about ps4nodrm being a stunt? Any proof to this?
Woah, just started reading and Fm is banned?
What's this about ps4nodrm being a stunt? Any proof to this?
I wouldn't call it a stunt it was Sony seeing which way the popular view was leaning and jumping aboard and taking advantage of the opening MS presented to them at E3.
It would have certainly been interesting if Sony went first at E3 2013 would they have switched it up like they did, when they saw the reaction to MS price and vison?
Woah, just started reading and Fm is banned?
What's this about ps4nodrm being a stunt? Any proof to this?
Well this thread certainly went for an unfortunate ride since I last checked it on page 5.
My prayers go out Col. and his son. Family crisis are never a good thing, and I'm sure most/all of us on GAF wish you all the best.
Nah. PS4nodrm was only a thing because yosp said that PS4 would not have always online way back in feb reveal, but nobody believed him.
Like almost all the major outlets were speculating that the PS4 would have DRM, and all the MS fanboys were too. Naturally the PS4 fanboys became worried.
i'll speculate that they are just playing it up since its already in motion and they have nothing to lose. If I am sony, i'll have play along with the tweets too for the good words.
Also this
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=106144967&postcount=2107
Can someone point out whats wrong with Sony making the no DRM thing a PR stuff?
For years now, the only insider that matters here is Matt.
All others seek publicity and fame, while he posts only when shit is important. One word from him and discussion is done.
This industry shit is so tiresome. These are the shittest threads on gaf. I don't care who got fired/quit some job. I play video games. I like video games. Let's talk about video games.
It's a sad state of affairs when most of the biggest threads are not even about games.
It's a sad state of affairs when most of the biggest threads are not even about games.
How come you have an animated avatar?
Anyway, jeez what a meltdown.
Does he still post here? Can't say I've ever come across him.
Sony had confirmed offline play and used games months before the 'movement'.
I wouldn't call it a stunt it was Sony seeing which way the popular view was leaning and jumping aboard and taking advantage of the opening MS presented to them at E3.
It would have certainly been interesting if Sony went first at E3 2013 would they have switched it up like they did, when they saw the reaction to MS price and vison?
You poor thing! Having a tough day aren't you?
Where is that from anyway?
To be fair, he wasn't the first one that said this.
What the hell? I think a lot of us like to play video games and talk about video games, but as an enthusiast video game forum, a lot of us also have a passion for the industry at large and that incorporates the individuals who compose them and their change in status within the industry.
Ascheticism posted some proof.
Though you have to say that our need for wanting to know the in's and out's of a ducks arse is starting to have an detrimental effect on individual developers reputations.
Mort's recent cockup is the 2nd in recent times. Another poster recently tried to make out a ND employee was about to be fired for being incompetent (tried to make out they were a ND insider).
This 'need' for information is leading GAF down a very dangerous path and I genuinely feel sorry for the mods as they try to contain these so called 'insiders'
I was the first backer for Pete's site and volunteered to write for it as well. I have emailed him and said I no longer feel comfortable being a part of it. I thought he had good ideas and a good outlook but I've literally felt sick and somehow partially responsible about this whole situation ever since I read Col's post.
This. Sony made it clear that the PS4 had no DRM on the level MS was rumored to have. But as you said, no one believed them. You had videogame journalists speculating that Sony will have the similar DRM like MS, but they're just waiting to drop the news. You had fanboys hoping Sony will have the same level of DRM. And you had sonyfans worried Sony will implement similar DRM.
The #NoDRM thing became one big free PR campaign for Sony because people didn't want to believe them for whatever reason when they had the PS4 conference in February 2013.
Ascheticism? Who is this guy? There's no GAF member with that name.
I remember the Bonus Round episodes before the presser on how Geoff was saying that consumers expect Sony to jump in as a knight in shining armor on the whole drm issueI think it was just pure denial that MS could be so dumb to try to restrict games in that manner without... well, "Sony Too!" Even I was like "There was no way MS would be doing this unless Sony was doing it also." As shown by what actually happened, dumb idea gets expected backlash, while competitor gets all the praise.
What is this about? Who got 4 grand?What a thread. I can't believe you guys threw four grand at this dude.
What is this about? Who got 4 grand?
so The whole #ps4nodrm "campaign" was a huge and free PR stunt for Sony. Nice to know now.
Dualshockers reported on Pete Dodd's post and ran with the story as an accurate source of information.
All they did in reality was further spread libelous and unfounded claims.
Thanks for the link, didn't know about that.
The DRM movement was free PR. nothing more, nothing less. The same websites claiming sony would have DRM probably reported that it would have 4gb ram, right?
The price point is the only one where they could adjust it (going lower) after hearing what MS would announce. However, they priced it higher than expected and the PS4 didnt have to drop any lower than the original price point.
This series of events should be used to have some introspection about what it means to discuss developers and project and the individuals that make up the high profile positions.I think this was just a case of somebody getting too big for their boots for the online fame. We should never take one side of the story at face value (as exciting as that is), as the person who doesn't get their say gets hurt.
We can say we'll learn the lessons, and this won't happen again, but it's only a matter of time sadly. Our thirst for information, combined with NeoGAFs general lack of knowledge on how things work behind the scenes (despite many thinking the contrary. Armchair Developers are rife on this forum) is not a good combination.
The fear was real, which is what the motivation for the campaign was. I didn't even participate in it, but to deny that the ones that did were doing it due to legitimate concerns is just wrong.They're incompetent though.
Sony had confirmed offline play and used games after the February announcement.
It's not revisionist at all, it was never going to happen, it was confirmed it was never going to happen, and a handful of sensationalism was the only reason people doubted it.
They're incompetent though.There is some historical revisionism going on here. You think the Yoshida articles were not also posted in the PS4NoDRM threads? You're not hot scoops because you post this now.
We had several enthusiast press people that said Sony will definitely do this. We had EDGE that was 100% sure that Sony would have an online-only console. Thousands of posts in that thread, hundreds of different posters.
Even when Sony said at E3 that they will never do that, we had people like Patrick Klepek and Jeff Gerstmann say this was a very late decision.
So stop that shit with "everyone already knew." Great that you already knew, but your post in March 2014 is nothing more than easy hindsight dressed up as analytics.
The fear that this was coming to PS4 was real and everyone that actually posted around that time know that it was a real concern for a large majority of posters.
Everyone just pouncing on the guy all of a sudden that he was always a fake is very disconcerting. He fucked up big this time, but claiming he didn't have some form of access which he shared with us that turned out to be true is changing history.