• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Microsoft Earnings: 1.2 million Xbox One's shipped in Jan-Mar, 5.1M total (3.9+1.2)

FDC1

Member
Just to clarify for everyone, there are no hard numbers for what MS has sold through to consumers

Most popular guesstimate is 4.2M though but could be as high as 4.6M/4.7M imo

Very very doubtful. 4M-4.2M is a rational expectation for me. 4.6 would mean Microsoft has sold more X1 outside US than Inside. Very unlikely.
 

Biker19

Banned
lol, you wish. Keep dreaming, dreamer.

Not dreaming. We're talking about the reality of the issue. They're not going to keep plucking down billions of dollars into the brand without making back a big return in profitability, no matter how much money that MS has.
 

nynt9

Member
No one has ever talked about sell through to consumers before Sony started this past holiday season, whether it be Sony, Microsoft, or Nintendo. The only figure we traditionally get from them is this shipment figure during quarterly reports. Anyone who has followed Sales-Age for more than a year knows this. This isn't some trickery by Microsoft, it's been standard practice in the game industry for decades now.

But no, the sales/shipments are in no way bad. If you go into older GAF threads about shipments actually you will see that no one here ever thought they'd reach this milestone before April by the way:

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=681101&highlight=xbox+one+5+million

Just sayin.

No one expected Sony to reach this number as well, so that's not saying much tbh.
 

Salex_

Member
Those are actually good numbers for Microsoft.
I hope they keep on doing alright, and improve if possible.
It's not good for gamers for a single company to dominate the market.

Yeah, I hated the PS1 and PS2 days, the DS, and the 3DS, Amazon and Steam are also terrible for dominating....wait.
 

kyser73

Member
Agreed. While their investors may keep Xbox One around this generation (by most likely spinning the division off), I think we can most likely say that they'll cancel R&D for the 4th Xbox console. They're not gonna tolerate more big losses of the Xbox brand for the third generation in a row.

I think that's primarily dependent on which direction the board decides to take the company in the non-OS/productivity sectors. If they still think pushing a home-hub/central dedicated box as a long-term goal you may even get muttering a of a replacement 3-4 years down the road that addresses the issues with the XBone.

Or MS may decide to cut their losses in consumer outside of OS and go the IBM route of Enterprise-only, and just taking the patent fees for their consumer tech.
 

Guevara

Member
Absolute garbage to quell investor fears. That is a meaningless quote.
Those hours could be benefitting Netflix more than MS.

That (and the inventory draw down) are literally the only things I've heard about the Xbox one on the investor call. It's a pretty weak statistic to report, almost entirely meaningless like you say, and mostly TV services.
 
Someone always makes a mistake. We thought MS will learn from Sony mistakes and they didnt. Also we dont know if the same people at sony now will be there down the round in 10 yrs. A lot can change in that amount of time.

I'm not disputing any of that. I think you are right.
But again- why do so many automatically assume Sony dominating will lead to something worse for gamers?


Even Sony's arrogance after PS2's amazing run still gave us a pretty fantastic PS3 system. Sure, it was expensive compared to its competitors. Yes, the PR from the company was terrible ("next-gen starts when we say so", "get a second job", "if you can find one on the shelf I'll give you $1,000"), but it was still pretty good value for that price. You got a top of the line game console. You got a top of the line BluRay device (cheapest on the market). You got free online. You got backwards compatibility with PS1 and PS2 games (at launch).
PS3 is a damn great system. It was at launch. It still is almost 8 years later.

I just want someone to give me more examples why they think the PS4 dominating this gen would be legitimately bad for gamers... examples other than two rough years from 2006-2008 when PS3's price and messaging was poor.
Hell, I don't even think the PS4 will dominate like the PS2 did, but I keep seeing it come up in these sales threads and I have yet to see any compelling arguments other than "but PS3!".

What's bad for gamers is if all of these systems are bombing, which fortunately isn't the case.
 

Jomjom

Banned
Just to clarify for everyone, there are no hard numbers for what MS has sold through to consumers

Most popular guesstimate is 4.2M though but could be as high as 4.6M/4.7M imo

We know that it's at the very least 3.7-3.8 million sold through to consumers, given that Xbone sold 3 million (WW) in 2013, and then another 7-800k (US) total thus far in 2014.
 

Guevara

Member
Fun fact: the guy asking about cloud revenue is Rick Sherlund of Nomura, who previous said:

"We conclude that Xbox platform plus Windows phone and Skype lose about $2.5 billion per year, and we estimate that the Xbox platform may account for roughly $2 billion of this," Sherlund asserted. "This is contrary to conventional wisdom, we think investors do not realize how extensive the operating costs are for this business and it is concealed by the hugely profitable Android royalties."

"Xbox is an orphan in our view," Sherlund said. "It is a 'cool' product line and a successful consumer franchise, but it also loses a lot of money and we think is a distraction to the more enterprise strengths of Microsoft."

So it's a shame he didn't press again today.
 

Lace

Member
Just to clarify for everyone, there are no hard numbers for what MS has sold through to consumers

Most popular guesstimate is 4.2M though but could be as high as 4.6M/4.7M imo



Was the Dreamcast an accessory for the Saturn?

Where would you estimate those extra half million consoles sold? There is no place Microsoft can rely on to pick up slacking sales outside of the US.
 

Jomjom

Banned
This "If You Ain't First, You're Last!" messaging needs to die. Both exceeded expectations for their companies, it's just that the PS4 exceeded them by a wider margin.

I think the xbone didn't exceed expectations given MS specifically noted that the 360 did, but didn't comment on the xbone in their conference call just now as people were saying.
 
Microsoft completely funded Titanfall? Then why wouldn't they also publish?

Long story, but you should spend the 1.99 and go read the Final Hours of Titanfall.

In the end, EA had funded development through its original $30M investment in Respawn. By 2011 there was no game to show and the cash was used up. EA wanted to pull the plug, unless Respawn found cash. Respawn approached Sony and MS. Sony offered funding if they made a Vita game, MS offered up the cash with an understanding that the game would release first on Xbox consoles if they funded. Respawn being a small team took the cash and realized that it would be difficult to make multiple versions anyway.
 
Where would you estimate those extra half million consoles sold? There is no place Microsoft can rely on to pick up slacking sales outside of the US.

Would have to be rest of the world sans US
lol

I say the higher estimates because he who should not be named tweeted a strong internal source at MS pegged WW LTD for XB1 at 4.4M - 4.55M like 2 weeks ago or so

I personally expect 4.2M - 4.4M
 
I guess Micro$oft is happy with "minimum wage."

4z2xB1K.gif
 
Not dreaming. We're talking about the reality of the issue. They're not going to keep plucking down billions of dollars into the brand without making back a big return in profitability, no matter how much money that MS has.

They arent taking a loss for xbox one.
 

Salex_

Member
Read the last 2 pages and I'm seeing that word again. Can someone explain to me how the transition from PS2>PS3 was "arrogant"? I only see people talk about silly quotes. I think this post perfectly explains my thoughts on the situation:
What I got from Sony domination was a console capable of playing all PS1, PS2, and PS3 games. A $600 blu-ray player when blu-ray players were $1000. The only console with HDMI output. The only console capable of lossless sound and DTS sound in games. The only HD console with wifi capability. They provided 3x the HDD space of their main competitor. They provided the capability to upgrade the HDD to whatever size you wanted within the physical dimension limitations.

What I got cost Sony $850 BOM to build and they only charged $600 for it.

Yes, their PR was arrogant and they glossed over omissions like rumble by claiming it was a "last gen feature" and told people to get a second job to afford the system. (If I built something for $850 and tried to sell it for $600 and everyone told me it was still too expensive, I'd probably get upset too)

But the console itself outside of the blunder that was Cell, was a beast of value. And I didn't even buy the PS3 to game. I bought it ONLY for blu-ray and it was an incredible value. 360 was my gaming console of choice last gen.
 
They arent taking a loss for xbox one.

I have serious doubts retailers all dropped the TF bundles to $450 without some rebate by MS

If true, MS ate $50 on every $450 TF bundle sold plus the $20 - $30 for the copy of TF

About the same, actually. From what I can find, the PS2 sold around 50 million each in North America and Europe.

As far as I know it was equal:

50 million each. EU might of edged it.

Nah i believe U.S edged it.

PS2 LTD in the US was just shy of 46M before it stopped being tracked in like 2010

I would say Europe was probably higher than 50% of PS2's WW LTD
 
Long story, but you should spend the 1.99 and go read the Final Hours of Titanfall.

In the end, EA had funded development through its original $30M investment in Respawn. By 2011 there was no game to show and the cash was used up. EA wanted to pull the plug, unless Respawn found cash. Respawn approached Sony and MS. Sony offered funding if they made a Vita game, MS offered up the cash with an understanding that the game would release first on Xbox consoles if they funded. Respawn being a small team took the cash and realized that it would be difficult to make multiple versions anyway.

Sounds like Sony still cares about the Vita at least :)

The fact that Respawn needed more cash to finish is troubling to me - that suggests the game may have needed to do gangbusters to make that money back.
 
I have serious doubts retailers all dropped the TF bundles to $450 without some rebate by MS

If true, MS ate $50 on every $450 TF bundle sold plus the $20 - $30 for the copy of TF







PS2 LTD in the US was just shy of 46M before it stopped being tracked in like 2010

I would say Europe was probably higher than 50% of PS2's WW LTD
Even if that was the case you think they will keep doing that. Chances are it will be till an official price cut happens.
 
So the Xbox One's quarterly shipment rate has fallen behind the 360's. It'll be interesting to see if that continues long enough to see the Xbox One's total sales fall behind the 360's over a comparable timeframe. I believe it will.

I've expected it to happen since around launch. The Xbox One isn't as attractive to the general video game audience relative to the ps4 as the 360 was to the ps3, which would imply lower overall lifetime sales for the One versus the 360. However, the 360 expanded the group of dedicated Xbox fans willing to buy an Xbox near launch, and Microsoft has greatly increased the initial supply available to those consumers.

I would expect Microsoft to continue shipping less Ones per quarter than they did 360s, barring any drastic moves on price (likely) or some game changing piece of software (unlikely).
 
Top Bottom