• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

*UNMARKED SPOILERS ALL BOOKS* Game of Thrones |OT| - Season 4 - Sundays on HBO

Status
Not open for further replies.

Lothar

Banned
But he said he's going to the wall. Not in the books, on the show.

There's no big surprise, no big reveal. He said he's going to the wall in season 3, episode 10 and in all subsequent scenes, he's gathered an army.

The whole point of shocking TV moments is that they're genuinely shocking. If they're just shocking to the people who can't be bothered to pay attention to things that are explicitly said, what's the point?

Why have they been careful not to mention where he's going all season then? It would be a surprise to 95% of the non-book readers thread judging by what they've been saying.
 

Speevy

Banned
Why have they been careful not to mention where he's going all season then? It would be a surprise to 95% of the non-book readers thread judging by what they've been saying.

Then the non-book readers are not very attentive at all, and the show-runners don't know how to surprise people.
 

Chris R

Member
That might be an option, the could move LSH to the end of S5.

I wonder what they will do with FFC anyway. The book was definitely the "slowest" of them all, and introduced new characters and places, which might confuse TV watchers even more. Wouldn't be suprised, if S5 tells the whole story of FFC and DOD.

They can't move LSH to the end of S5. You can't just introduce her to us via Brienne, she needs to have at least one scene before then. Who knows how the Brienne story will play out though, since she sees Arya on Sunday it looks like.
 

Speevy

Banned
Don't forget about the "North Remembers" track from the soundtrack.

None of the Starks are in situations where that track would be relevant.

What if there's a scene with the Greatjon and Rickon, or some other northern lords?
 

Brakke

Banned
Still on #teamwhatever for Stoneheart. It's straight up weird to introduce her at all. She's not a character, she doesn't have a personality, she doesn't have an arc. After her reveal, she doesn't do anything in the books for a long while.

Though I guess Game of Thrones has a thing for keeping some magic hanging out threateningly on the periphery. The fact she exists might be an end.
 

Chris R

Member
She may not have a personality, but she fills an important role.

Show viewers have strong feelings for the Stark family. You introduce her at the end of this season and then drop lines in KL about Frey's showing up missing or dead once or twice next season before bringing her back in 8/9/10 for the "Sword" stuff.
 

Yoda

Member
Interesting pic from reddit

uaJdSdx.jpg
 
Based on the preview, does anybody think Tywin will sort of admit he knows about Jaime and Cersei? Would be an interesting confrontation since it's hinted he knows but he'd never admit it.
 

Famassu

Member
I'm 50/50 on the whole LSH thing, there are arguments for both, although I consider the "no one has seen or mentioned the brotherhood this whole season" a pretty strong one for why they would push it back to like ep 2 or 3 in the next season after maybe having the guy die and be resurrected again once or twice
Hotpie & Brienne mentioned the Brotherhood in the 7th or 8th episode. Hotpie tells about them being captured by the Brotherhood and The Hound being there and I think (IIRC) Brienne then thinks the Brotherhood is the one taking Arya to the Vale (with The Hound still with them).
 
Hotpie & Brienne mentioned the Brotherhood in the 7th or 8th episode. Hotpie tells about them being captured by the Brotherhood and The Hound and I think (IIRC) Brienne then thinks the Brotherhood is the one taking Arya to the Vale (with The Hound still with them).

Good one. Also, they don't have to have some lengthy reminder of Thoros of Myr being that guy that comes back from the dead, remember? Despite the whole "your sister" esque criticisms, I doubt viewers will forget that.
 

rataven

Member
Just occurred to me that next season might have some kind of resurrection-type subtheme. If they aren't cut from the show, we'll have LS, Gregorstein, Gravedigger, maybe Aegon?

They could push LS to open season 5 if they're going for that.
 
Just occurred to me that next season might have some kind of resurrection-type subtheme. If they aren't cut from the show, we'll have LS, Gregorstein, Gravedigger, maybe Aegon?

They could push LS to open season 5 if they're going for that.

The Walking Dead: Westeros
We just need the Dixon brothers a team of sell swords
 

Famassu

Member
Still on #teamwhatever for Stoneheart. It's straight up weird to introduce her at all. She's not a character, she doesn't have a personality, she doesn't have an arc. After her reveal, she doesn't do anything in the books for a long while.

Though I guess Game of Thrones has a thing for keeping some magic hanging out threateningly on the periphery. The fact she exists might be an end.
I don't understand how she is not a character or have a personality. She's currently just hellbent on revenge on all that wronged the Starks after the horrible things that were done to them. She's clearly mentally unstable, not giving a fuck if you're a(n ex-)friend or foe or not in her quest for "justice." Sure, that's kind of one-noted, but you can't really blame her.

She's not at the center of anything (yet) so there hasn't really been a need to show her too much, but we get some hints as to what she's planning that sound potentially awesome. We'll probably have either Brienne or Jaime witnessing those events in TWOW (aka (attempt at) Red Wedding #2: Lannister & Frey Edition) or otherwise I don't understand why GRRM would take both to her. She hasn't been in the center because she doesn't have to be. You know she exists, you know she's on a warpath with the Freys & Lannisters and you know she's got Brienne and Brienne is taking Jaime to her. That's all you've needed to know so far, otherwise it's really better she's been kept as a behind the scenes character.

Also, you'd think there'd be a bigger reason to take both Jaime & Brienne to Stoneheart than both just dying, so I think Stoneheart will play a bigger part in TWOW and that will be witnessed from one or both of their POVs (though, I think something will happen that will end her story in TWOW, I don't necessarily see her story being prolonged or relevant by ADOS).
 
Based on the preview, does anybody think Tywin will sort of admit he knows about Jaime and Cersei? Would be an interesting confrontation since it's hinted he knows but he'd never admit it.

In the books it's noted that Kevan Lannister never has a thought Tywin didn't have first...and Kevan clearly believed they were fucking. I'd imagine Tywin knew but didn't know, so to speak. As in he put a lot of time into killing the idea mentally, but somewhere deep down he had to know.
 

pr0cs

Member
i'll be very surprised if they show LS in E10. Just don't make sense to me given how much they have to show for that episode.
 

Szeth

Member
I think another argument for no Stoneheart is how D&D view the show. They don't see the seasons as individual books anymore, so for them, this season hasn't just been the second half of ASoS and it doesn't have to cover everything from it by the end. And they always saw the show as an "80 hour movie", so keeping a big WTF moment for early/mid season 5 (especially because of the lack of them going forward), might make sense for them.

They've already shown they don't have to keep to the usual TV structure for big moments, and this could be one of them.
 
I would wager good money they show Stoneheart at the very end of the episode, just like the book. Until all the discussion in this thread it never occurred to me that they wouldn't. I'm honestly surprised there's this much debate over it.
 

Moff

Member
I think another argument for no Stoneheart is how D&D view the show. They don't see the seasons as individual books anymore, so for them, this season hasn't just been the second half of ASoS and it doesn't have to cover everything from it by the end. And they always saw the show as an "80 hour movie", so keeping a big WTF moment for early/mid season 5 (especially because of the lack of them going forward), might make sense for them.

and I agree with that, why exactly would that bother anyone? just because it was in ASOS it needs to be in season 4? I dont even think its that big of a cliffhanger. there were tons of better cliffhangers in all the books in simple chapter cliffhangers. its a great wtf moment, but not a cliffhanger, and its better used during season 5 than the already overloaded episode 10 of this season.
 

Lonestar

I joined for Erin Brockovich discussion
I would wager good money they show Stoneheart at the very end of the episode, just like the book. Until all the discussion in this thread it never occurred to me that they wouldn't. I'm honestly surprised there's this much debate over it.

At this rate (and the fact there are now "sides" to this), I fear there will be a "ha ha" by whichever side ends up being right.
 

Szeth

Member
At this rate (and the fact there are now "sides" to this), I fear there will be a "ha ha" by whichever side ends up being right.

Everyone should join #teamnostoneheart, it's win-win. She isn't there? We were
sadly
right! She is there? Fuck yeah Stoneheart ahhhh!
 
Based on the preview, does anybody think Tywin will sort of admit he knows about Jaime and Cersei? Would be an interesting confrontation since it's hinted he knows but he'd never admit it.

I've definitely got the impression from the show that Tywin knows but he's in denial. Remember the scene where Jaime offers to resign from the kingsguard if Tyrion is spared- Tywin says something like "you will marry a wife of my choosing and father children named Lannister".
 

NeoGiff

Member
Interview with Liam Cunningham and Carice van Houten by Westeros.org.

For those interested, a choice quote of Liam's could point to some sort of answer on the Stoneheart issue:

Liam: We’re like a family, really. I just did something with Michelle Fairley in Ireland—last week, we were playing husband and wife—and I hadn’t seen her in months and months. You know, right now they’re saying that at this minute some of the best TV that’s ever been made is happening right now. You become aware that in fifty years, people will look back at the quality of this period. But when you’re actually in the middle of it, filming it, you have to realize it’s a transient thing, too.

He's mentioning that in the context that right now, they're all one big family, but eventually, dead characters (and eventually the whole cast) will have to move on.
 

Lonestar

I joined for Erin Brockovich discussion
Interview with Liam Cunningham and Carice van Houten by Westeros.org.

For those interested, a choice quote of Liam's could point to some sort of answer on the Stoneheart issue:



He's mentioning that in the context that right now, they're all one big family, but eventually, dead characters (and eventually the whole cast) will have to move on.

2 things: If it's a recent interview, and he just did a play, it's been months since they filmed the show. The other is that he wouldn't be around for a scene with LSH, and if filmed, assuredly would have been done secretly with a small crew.

It won't end on Dany. The song that sounds like it'll be the last song of the season, has some Stark bits in it. I've come around kind of hard on the whole theory of Bran "seeing" all the Stark Children, with the last bit (with no music, or not including in the song) showing The Mother.
 

tmdorsey

Member
Put me down for Stoneheart being in. I mean it's just too perfect a tv cliffhanger not to do it.

I will be highly upset if they don't show her just based on the missed opportunity for buildup for the next season because just based on what content we know is left they are gonna need get people foaming at the mouth for the next season of the show.
 

ElTorro

I wanted to dominate the living room. Then I took an ESRAM in the knee.
They wouldn't be in the same country if she was in Game of Thrones anyway. The Wall and the middle of Westeros are filmed in different countries, no? Someone like Kit doesn't see Emilia a lot either on set.

In addition, they could have filmed the LSH scene during the filming of season 3 when they had all relevant actors on set. That would have been more efficient than booking Michelle Fairley for just one short scene.
 

Loke13

Member
Yeah show Tywin is definitely a smart enough man to realize what Jaime and Cersei were doing. The only difference is he just sort of ignored it once the truth came out. Although had he been at King's Landing at the time I'm positive who would have made sure that Robert got Cersei pregnant just to avoid the whole legitimacy mess tha'ts been created.
 

Majmun

Member
why?
you make it sound like her existence only serves as a cliffhanger, and not as an important point in the story of 2 POV characters.

The Red Wedding is still being talked about. Ending the season with Stonehart would make a huge impact.
 

Lonestar

I joined for Erin Brockovich discussion
I like it, for the horrific revenge that is owed to alot of people, but also the inevitable damage she'll cause to the realm. Maybe kill a person that the world needs in the fight at The End, or perhaps because of "what she is" can become an unwitting agent of The Other or the Lord of Light.

With the various "Zombie" type characters, it feels like it's building towards something involving them.
 

Moff

Member
SPOILERS THREAD
SPOILERS THREAD
SPOILERS THREAD


The Red Wedding is still being talked about. Ending the season with Stonehart would make a huge impact.

I agree, stoneheart would have been a great ending to season 4.
but the way they paced season 4 (which I think could have been done a lot better), episode 10 is already full of great moments and cliff hangers. it would be a waste to have stoneheart here, and it isnt necessary at all, it can easily be done in season 5, much more easily than all the other arcs that need to find their end in season 4. and season 5 could really use more highlights, honestly.

I just dont see what the big deal is with moving her so season 5, unless of course you think the exists only for a cliffhanger.
 

Iksenpets

Banned
Myrcella recast would suck. Recasts suck in general and that girl was so into the show lol. Maybe she sucks at acting though? Who knows. That said, it is just a tumblr post, and given that they are casting young Cersei, it seems like it'd be really easy for the wires to get crossed in the rumor mill and have people thinking that the casting for young Cersei is actually a new Myrcella.

As for Stoneheart, things that appear in the episode aren't necessarily shown in the recap. Last year episode 10 had that scene at Pyke with Balon and Yara getting the dick in a box, but neither characters were shown in the recap. It does seem like they would've at least mentioned the Brotherhood or shown Sansa's clip where she talks about them dumping her mother in the river.

If there's no Stoneheart though, and we're definitely getting a Brienne/Hound encounter this week, then I have no idea where they're going with Brienne for next season. Just her and Pod wandering aimlessly after failing to get Arya? This whole season for her seemed carefully constructed to avoid exactly that, since people never really liked the meandering nature of her plot in the books. Her plot arc really doesn't make much sense without ending on Stoneheart.
 

tmdorsey

Member
SPOILERS THREAD
SPOILERS THREAD
SPOILERS THREAD




I agree, stoneheart would have been a great ending to season 4.
but the way they paced season 4 (which I think could have been done a lot better), episode 10 is already full of great moments and cliff hangers. it would be a waste to have stoneheart here, and it isnt necessary at all, it can easily be done in season 5, much more easily than all the other arcs that need to find their end in season 4. and season 5 could really use more highlights, honestly.

I just dont see what the big deal is with moving her so season 5, unless of course you think the exists only for a cliffhanger.


The other moments slated for this episode don't qualify as cliffhangers and will not have viewers talking about the show for months on end like Catelyn Stark's return to avenge the Starks would.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom