lonedigitalwolf
Banned
So happy for them, kudos Sony.
Yea. The only games that are going to go with single platforms are niche games.This is ridiculous. The Xbox one will sell more than the Xbox did in its first couple of years and unless you are talking about Japan, the big 3rd parties are done with exclusives unless there is a deal with the 1st party.
This is ridiculous. The Xbox one will sell more than the Xbox did in its first couple of years and unless you are talking about Japan, the big 3rd parties are done with exclusives unless there is a deal with the 1st party.
Yea. The only games that are going to go with single platforms are niche games.
I honestly think they'll do $299 for late next year, $199 for 2017, $99 for 2018, PS5 in 2019.
This is ridiculous. The Xbox one will sell more than the Xbox did in its first couple of years and unless you are talking about Japan, the big 3rd parties are done with exclusives unless there is a deal with the 1st party.
I don't think pubs will ignore the One simply because of how similar the two are hardware wise. They might spend less time optimizing for the bone though.
Not a chance that you get a new PS4 for $99 in 2018.You can't even get a new PS3 for that price today and here we are nearly 7+ years post launch.
I'm speaking more of a situation where publishers decide it's not financially feasible to put out a Xbone version alongside a PS4 version. Obviously, with the way the Xbone is selling right now, this type of situation has no chance of happening, but it is a possibility.
The PS4 can actually be made to be cheaper though. The Cell in the PS3 kills the systems ability to reduce manufacturing costs.
Still, the biggest problem for these systems getting down to $99 is going to hard drives.
The PS4 can actually be made to be cheaper though. The Cell in the PS3 kills the systems ability to reduce manufacturing costs.
Still, the biggest problem for these systems getting down to $99 is going to hard drives.
LOL It definitely wouldn't have. $250 hit that magical sweet spot between 'too expensive' and 'gotta have it now'. When you combine that with the allure of motion controls, you see why the Wii was so popular compared to 360 and PS3 which were lumbering giants with heavy pricetags.
Also, anyone expecting a pricedrop anytime soon is crazy. Sony is finally in a place where they can make money and not have to lose out to make it popular. Expect bundles, but not cuts.
Sorry if this was already discussed, but, other than the hardware numbers, there is something quite incredible with the software numbers. Unless there is something I understand wrong in those fiscal documents.
Sony announced 106 millions software sold on PS platforms for july-september, so 3 months.
Nintendo, if we refer to this document, sold 33.8 millions software... and that's for april-september, so 6 months.
I think this is even more significant than the difference in hardware numbers. Of course, not having any big third party support for Wii U doesn't help Nintendo's case, and Microsoft never reveal its software numbers.
Sounds good to me.
#GoldenAge2.0
people who bought PS4 are not casuals like Wii for motion controls
Can you direct me where you see that?
Not a chance that you will be able to buy a new PS4 for $99 in 2018. You can't even buy a new PS3 today at that price and here we are nearly 7+ years post launch.
I just hope that Sony does a temporary price cut for the holiday season just to keep MS away from taking the top spot in Nov-Dec, it'd be glorious if the PS4 outsold the XBO all year long (to me at least).
Because the stuff inside the PS3 is too expensive, hence it'll never get that cheap. Sony designed the PS4 specifically with fast price cuts and adaptability in mind.
Why? Would your PS4 run faster or have better games available for it right now if Sony outsells Microsoft for an entire year? If it was me, I'd rather they lost a couple of months so they had to stay on their toes and provide decent features, deals, and exclusives in order to stay ahead.
Not trying to be rude, really I'm not. I just don't understand why people root for one multi-national corporation over another multi-national corporation (neither of which care about their customers any more than as a way of making money) as if they're sports teams. The logic just goes over my head.
Yes, that's quite a pain to read, so this is how I get it (last page of the document)
3DS software is 2,330 which means 23.3 millions here
Wii software is 618 which means 6.1 millions
Wii U software is 940, so 9.4 millions
As I'm not especially good with maths, I wondered if everyone else is getting the same results ?
Why? Would your PS4 run faster or have better games available for it right now if Sony outsells Microsoft for an entire year? If it was me, I'd rather they lost a couple of months so they had to stay on their toes and provide decent features, deals, and exclusives in order to stay ahead.
Not trying to be rude, really I'm not. I just don't understand why people root for one multi-national corporation over another multi-national corporation (neither of which care about their customers any more than as a way of making money) as if they're sports teams. The logic just goes over my head.
Sony took (mostly) all the right decisions with the PS4, MS... well i cannot say the same for them. Sony deserves the success but IMHO MS does not (regardless of their countless 180's).
I agree. It's a good thing for MS to be behind, because it'll be more harder & more expensive to acquire 3rd party exclusives & timed-exclusive DLC.
We all saw what happened when Microsoft was on top with Xbox 360. They started forgetting about the core fans ever since E3 2010 by focusing constantly on Kinect & Media as well as only bringing out Halo, Gears, Forza (& sometimes Fable) as exclusives throughout E3 2010 to present.
Sounds good to me.
#GoldenAge2.0
gtav ps4 bundle edition is going to sell it self however if sony wants bigger numbers they need to counter MS deal with something along the same lines for the holiday season
gtav ps4 bundle edition is going to sell it self however if sony wants bigger numbers they need to counter MS deal with something along the same lines for the holiday season
Other than wiping out all of the retained earnings of SCE, you're right lol.bring back kutaragi
he did nothing wrong
People want that PS2.0 back man...or at least the closest thing to it. I know I do.The logic just goes over my head.
According to a new PS promo video on YouTube.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MEFpSYZAoRo
My estimates based on information (and other people's guesses) in this thread so far:
PS3 = 84 million
Vita = 8 million
PS4 = 8 million
EDIT: Added the IGN story even though I know everyone hates IGN:
http://ca.ign.com/articles/2014/07/09/ps4-ps3-vita-100-million-sold-and-counting
EDIT 2:
PS Blog post confirming the 80 million PS3 number as of November 2, 2013
http://us.playstation.com/corporate...3-sales-reach-80-million-units-worldwide.html
EDIT 3:
Via Aqua-math, PS3 Oct - March 2014 is 4.2 million, so it shouldn't be a far stretch to say November to July is 4.5-5 million PS3s sold, which puts us at 84-85 million PS3s (Say 84 to be safe). And (also Aquamarine) has Vita LTD around 8.35 million..
84 + 8.35 = 92.35, which leaves us with 7.65 million PS4s sold. That seems a bit...low to me considering how long ago 7 million sold-through was announced. But these are all estimates of course.
They explained it's a very conservative profit forecast.
They will revise it if Q4 sales go really well as they expect.
Btw great performance for the PS4.
I'm also kinda surprised that PS3 and Vita are doing similar numbers worldwide. Guess that the Vita advantage in Japan offset better PS3 sales in western countries.
Just saw a mediamarkt bundle with ps4 + driveclub + minecraft + watch dogs for 399 here. Mindblown.
It's going to be a bloody Christmas. PS4 already humiliating Xbox one here without that type of ridiculous bundles...
has PS4 + GTA-V bundle confirmed for North America (USA)?
Why? Would your PS4 run faster or have better games available for it right now if Sony outsells Microsoft for an entire year?
has PS4 + GTA-V bundle confirmed for North America (USA)?
Oh. I see. Well without any unexpected costs it's hard too see why they would have bad holiday season. They used to make pretty optimistic forecasts in the past though (like with that first Vita hw forecast lol) so maybe they are extra careful nowadays.
Sorry if this was already discussed, but, other than the hardware numbers, there is something quite incredible with the software numbers. Unless there is something I understand wrong in those fiscal documents.
Sony announced 106 millions software sold on PS platforms for july-september, so 3 months.
Nintendo, if we refer to this document, sold 33.8 millions software... and that's for april-september, so 6 months.
I think this is even more significant than the difference in hardware numbers. Of course, not having any big third party support for Wii U doesn't help Nintendo's case, and Microsoft never reveal its software numbers.
Not trying to be rude, really I'm not. I just don't understand why people root for one multi-national corporation over another multi-national corporation (neither of which care about their customers any more than as a way of making money) as if they're sports teams. The logic just goes over my head.
PS3 WW Shipments
----------------------------------------------------
| FYQ1 | FYQ2 | FYQ3 | FYQ4 | | |
----------------------------------------------------
Year | Ap-Jn | Jl-Sp | Oc-Dc | Ja-Mr | FY | LTD |
----------------------------------------------------
FY06 | N/A | N/A | 1.7 | 1.8 | 3.5 | 3.5 |
FY07 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 4.9 | 2.2 | 9.1 | 12.6 |
FY08 | 1.6 | 2.4 | 4.5 | 1.6 | 10.1 | 22.7 |
FY09 | 1.1 | 3.2 | 6.5 | 2.2 | 13.0 | 35.7 |
FY10 | 2.4 | 3.5 | 6.3 | 2.1 | 14.3 | 50.0 |
FY11 | 1.8 | 3.7 | 6.5 | 1.9 | 13.9 | 63.9 |
FY12 | PS2 + PS3 FY Total = 16.5M |
FY13 | 1.1 | 2.0 | 3.3 | 0.7 | 7.1 | |
FY14 | 0.8 | 0.8 | | | 1.6 | |
Year | FYQ3 Sales as % of FYQ4-FYQ2 Sales |
-------------------------------------------
FY06 | N/A |
FY07 | 129% |
FY08 | 73% | <- Worst PS3 Holiday Quarter relative to preceding 3 quarters
FY09 | 110% |
FY10 | 78% |
FY11 | 86% |
FY13 | 106% |
AVG | 97% |
|If Q3 shipments are _ of Q4-Q2 | Then Q3 shipments are |
---------------------------------------------------------
| 73% | 6.57M |
| 78% | 7.02M |
| 86% | 7.74M |
| 97% | 8.73M |
| 106% | 9.54M |
| 110% | 9.90M |
| 129% | 11.61M |
You should take a look into the PAL charts thread, wouldn't be so sure about this then.