• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Digital Foundry vs GTAV on XONE - performance analysis

Shin-Ra

Junior Member
UKfHYEZ.gif
These threads are hilarious. Both console got perks. If you strictly want best looking games you should ALWAYS get PS4 version.

But I like how PS4 defense force is always there to make Xbox One owner feel bad for their purchase decisions.

If just by knowing you own the better looking game makes you sleep well at night then thats good. I honestly find these frame to frame graphical comparison silly. But hey thats just me. I am not judging anyone. If you are hardcore graphics guy, sure go ahead and buy what you think makes you more happy.

But dont judge other people who buy games on their Xbox One. I love OS feature like being able to jump in any games with voice command, I like pause/resume feature in games like this. I like achievements more, i got more friends to play with one Xbox one. I This thread has been good fun.

So when I say those graphical difference are truly minor imo, I am not being a fanboy or "fighting the good fight" But I have other important things in my list to enjoy game other than graphics.
Damn, this thread has it all.

Yeah. Looks like PS4 has better LoD for grass.
Lots of Ducks too?!
 
People coming into a performance analysis thread and talking about controllers, OS functionality, and friends. I've seen it all now.

Then there's the danowat draw distance conspiracy theory.
 

orochi91

Member

Lol

People coming into a performance analysis thread and talking about controllers, OS functionality, and friends. I've seen it all now.

Then there's the danowat draw distance conspiracy theory.

I get second-hand embarrassment when I read those posts.

Like, why bring irrelevant stuff like that to a tech thread?

What are they hoping to accomplish?

Defense Force syndrome is terrifying.
 

Lord Error

Insane For Sony
I really wish devs of these (more or less) 30FPS locked games would leave an option of unlocked framerate.

I *loved* playing KZ:SF and Infamous at their ~40FPS average framerate and don't care if anyone prefers it clamped down to 30, I found the default in these two games to be far superior and to my taste. I just don't get why this option won't get implemented in more games. FC4 and GTAV would be obvious example where this would probably yield similar 40FPS average at the very least. It's such a simple thing to implement, and would make everyone happy no matter how they set it by default.
 

d9b

Banned
I really wish devs of these (more or less) 30FPS locked games would leave an option of unlocked framerate.

I *loved* playing KZ:SF and Infamous at their ~40FPS average framerate and don't care if anyone prefers it clamped down to 30, I found the default in these two games to be far superior and to my taste. I just don't get why this option won't get implemented in more games. FC4 and GTAV would be obvious example where this would probably yield similar 40FPS average at the very least.
I support this. We should have a choice.
 

MilkyJoe

Member
I'm looking at the grass in the ps4 version and thinking, why the feck is the xbox version not 900p

Disappointed
 

Derpyduck

Banned
I know but it's obvious that the PS4 version will have a few advantages, more grass being one of them.

It does appear to have more grass, but it suffers from some nasty pop-in of that grass as you drive through it. At least in online. It reminds me of the old Tiger Woods games which also had moving grass but it only really showed itself once you got within it, which is what I'm seeing in the PS4 version of GTA. It's definitely not a pretty game, but anyone that played the older version as much as I have will notice the many changes to performance. Races that used to result in a ton of framerate drops are now much smoother. Lots of cool new lighting affects as well. The defense towers in the military base appear to be quicker with their anti-air missiles now. I used to be able to fly overhead and just drop right in, but now they fire almost immediately upon entering their airspace.

Finally ended up in a lobby that wasn't empty. It had 4 other people in it. Not great, but at least it's a start. Very happy with my purchase.
 
Both versions look good. Both full HD. XBone version holding up better than some expected. PS4 has a bit of extra foliage, possibly slightly smoother when lots of shit happens. Which you'd expect given the hardware.

Every gamer is a winner :)
 

HardRojo

Member
Why are some people arguing about blades of grass?

#firstworldproblems
We've had so many DF threads by now that you'd think people would know better and not complain when there's a debate about graphics comparison (be it grass, LOD, DOF, etc) and resolution or framerate.
Those types of discussions are mainly why DF threads exist in my opinion. There's more grass in one version? Framerate is 2 or 3 fps higher than the other version in average? Yeah well, that's exactly what people are supposed to be discussing here.
 
We've had so many DF threads by now that you'd think people would know better and not complain when there's a debate about graphics comparison (be it grass, LOD, DOF, etc) and resolution or framerate.
Those types of discussions are mainly why DF threads exist in my opinion. There's more grass in one version? Framerate is 2 or 3 fps higher than the other version in average? Yeah well, that's exactly what people are supposed to be discussing here.

This.

I'm surprised we haven't seen the 'first world problems' comment yet.
 

Piggus

Member
I'm looking at the grass in the ps4 version and thinking, why the feck is the xbox version not 900p

Disappointed

That grass would look like shit at 900p. It would be a shimmering mess.

We've had so many DF threads by now that you'd think people would know better and not complain when there's a debate about graphics comparison (be it grass, LOD, DOF, etc) and resolution or framerate.
Those types of discussions are mainly why DF threads exist in my opinion. There's more grass in one version? Framerate is 2 or 3 fps higher than the other version in average? Yeah well, that's exactly what people are supposed to be discussing here.

THIS!

Also your damn avatar makes me want an Inca Kola. Been craving it even since visiting Peru but can't find it in the States! :(
 

hesido

Member
DF updates the article with PS4 info:

... completed work on an initial performance analysis of the PlayStation 4 version of Grand Theft Auto 5, which you can find embedded below. At first blush, we're looking at a very similar release to the Xbox One version - with only one really noticeable difference, the implementation of a lens flare effect that appears either absent or dialled back on Xbox One. Frame-rate is confirmed at 30fps, though the rare dropped frames seen on Xbox One are even less of an issue here.

PS4 more lens flare confirmed. More stable framerate. They are looking into the grassy differences.
 

HardRojo

Member
THIS!

Also your damn avatar makes me want an Inca Kola. Been craving it even since visiting Peru but can't find it in the States! :(

We got plenty over here :p I found some in a gas station when I was in Boston , it was like finding water in the desert lol. They just released a new one based on Chicha morada (if you were in Peru you definitely know what it is) callled "La moradita de Inca Kola" but it's so bad they are basically giving it away and will probably be retired in a few months.

On topic: I hope the PS4 vs XBO comparison is released soon just to be sure what exactly is going on.

DF updates the article with PS4 info:



PS4 more lens flare confirmed. More stable framerate. They are looking into the grassy differences.
Oh.
 

Kayant

Member
These threads are hilarious. Both console got perks. If you strictly want best looking games you should ALWAYS get PS4 version.

But I like how PS4 defense force is always there to make Xbox One owner feel bad for their purchase decisions.

If just by knowing you own the better looking game makes you sleep well at night then thats good. I honestly find these frame to frame graphical comparison silly. But hey thats just me. I am not judging anyone. If you are hardcore graphics guy, sure go ahead and buy what you think makes you more happy.

But dont judge other people who buy games on their Xbox One. I love OS feature like being able to jump in any games with voice command, I like pause/resume feature in games like this. I like achievements more, i got more friends to play with one Xbox one. I like xbox one controller.

So when I say those graphical difference are truly minor imo, I am not being a fanboy or "fighting the good fight" But I have other important things in my list to enjoy game other than graphics.

You forgot the most important thing fun. Not surprised at the better performance on PS4 using Unity as a indication for anything is silly because of how bugging it is and the performance on all platforms not being great. Also wow and the foliage difference.
 
instead of leaping to analyse grass how about DF spend time with something their automated tools dont tell them;

"Curiously, despite a consistent update, judder can manifest a little during gameplay - a curious effect. We'll need to look into this a little more, but we can rule out frame-pacing as an issue, as the straight-line frame-time graphs in the video below demonstrate."

they used the word curious twice then just spat out the article anyway.
 
Top Bottom