The character design might be nice, but the game itself...no thank you.
Oh, you've played it? Please, tell me more.
The character design might be nice, but the game itself...no thank you.
Or it's character design that's intended only to work in tandem with the story being told, rather than trying to communicate obvious traits before a word's been uttered.
Main character is Nicolas Cage.
The character design might be nice, but the game itself...no thank you.
The character design might be nice, but the game itself...no thank you.
The character design might be nice, but the game itself...no thank you.
I agree with this post.They look great to me as well. Can't wait for the game. I think it's going to proof alot of people on this forum wrong, I'm sure. Ready at Dawn doesn't make bad games. The latest trailer looked absolutely brilliant as well. It looks far more interesting than any third person shooter I've seen in a while. The Victorian setting, Nikola Tesla, lycans, the creative guns, the gunplay and the incredible atmosphere. Can't wait to see more footage at the PlayStation Experience.
Lack of minorities is troubling even if historically accurate
My created character in Sunset Overdrive has better character design than this dude
A lot of thought the same about Sunset Overdrive and I don't think I've seen anyone disappointed about it..
I have a lot of hope for this game!
If it's historically accurate, then I see no problem.Lack of minorities is troubling even if historically accurate
is this supposed to be an alternative history zombie game
i'm not into zombie games period and that is the main reason i didn't get tlou. not even tlour.
Lack of minorities is troubling even if historically accurate
is this supposed to be an alternative history zombie game
i'm not into zombie games period and that is the main reason i didn't get tlou. not even tlour.
People who hate this game are those who want just action all the time and multiplayer instead of single player story oriented action adventure game. Most of the people in Gaf want to discuss about action part of the gameplay elements only but not the story, history, characters more etc., When someone tries it won't get the big topics like sales, resolution wars etc.,
This game is about showing a history and how the characters in the game played the role to change it, but most of the people just want/expect to kill those half breeds with guns blazing all the time instead of using mind and move along with the story as needed which the developers intends to do.
Looking at these characters I couldn't tell you a damn thing about them. Nothing about their design communicates their personality, background, profession, nothing. This is an example of really poor character design.
Fair point, but even if that's the case the designs are so close to those of Assassin's Creed, and I just find them totally uninspiring. Good character design makes me want to get to know the character, and hopefully play as them. Blizzard have recently done an absolutely tremendous job of this with the Overwatch line up. I don't want to play as any of these characters.
My first thought too. He's way older.
I agree, we must stick true to the time humanity fought werewolves off using technology that doesn't exist.If it's historically accurate, then I see no problem.
Exact contrary.
The character design tells us they are well taught persons, serving someone with weapons, they cure their bodies and their health so they are an above the average level of workers
They are clean, probably serve someone important, sure they eat all days in an historical period when that was not certain.
The woman can use oils and make ups, the men have enough time to cure their aspects and moustaches
Eyes look clever, they probably can read and speak in a period when 70% of the population probably couldn't
Character design is not overly done, looks natural and plausibile, men look like Sirs and woman doesn't look like a street hooker
So much class
I really hope this game has immersive gameplay to go along with the visuals
Historical accuracy seems like a meaningless concern in a game so heavily centered on fantasy elements. Nothing about a black person being there is less accurate than werewolves. The lack of minorities is almost certainly representative of the greater lack of representation in gaming and popular media in general.
That being said, maybe there will be greater inclusion shown in additional main characters outside of the squad they have focused on thus far. That doesn't seem terribly likely but its possible.
Exact contrary.
The character design tells us they are well taught persons, serving someone with weapons, they cure their bodies and their health so they are an above the average level of workers
They are clean, probably serve someone important, sure they eat all days in an historical period when that was not certain.
The woman can use oils and make ups, the men have enough time to cure their aspects and moustaches
Eyes look clever, they probably can read and speak in a period when 70% of the population probably couldn't
Character design is not overly done, looks natural and plausibile, men look like Sirs and woman doesn't look like a street hooker
So much class
All the guys look the same. White dude that doesn't shave x 3
Let me tell you straight up. Gallahad is not in his 30's he's in his mid to late 40's.
Lack of minorities is troubling even if historically accurate
Arent these dudes actually hundreds of years old or something like that?
How long did it take you to complete the game? Could you post impressions?
Well, they are historically accurate. Why include minorities in this game? Lol...
Disclaimer: I am a minority irl.
Hyperbole at it's best ladies and gentleman.The character design might be nice, but the game itself...no thank you.
I have no problem with a game focusing heavily on story, but you seem to be forgetting that most people play video games to play, not to watch.