• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

GeForce 6800 GT, best high end card out there?

Mrbob

Member
teh_pwn said:
You keep saying 3 GHz, but that's ambiguous.

There's the:

P4 3.0 GHz Northwood 533 FSB without HT "B"
P4 3.0 GHz Northwood 800 FSB with HT "C"
P4 3.0 GHz Prescott 800 FSB with HT "E"
P4 3.0 GHz 530 Prescott 800 FSB with HT

There's a HUGE difference between the first one and the rest. A 2.4 800 FSB beats a 3.0 533 FSB.

A P4 2.8 C has the same architecture as the 3.4 C. At 3.4 GHz, the 2.8 beats the 3.4 stock because it matches frequency, architecture, but has superor memory bandwidth.

The 3.4EE is hardly different from the normal Cs. It still has the Northwood 800 FSB core, but with some really expensive L3 cache.

The processors are so similar that when Intel f*cks up manufacturing the P4 EE with the L3 cache, it disables the L3 cache and sets the processor to whatever frequency needed. These are known as 30 cap processors because they have 30 capcitors inbetween the pins, while originals have 12.

All you have to do to get Extreme Edition speeds is get a 2.8 C or 3.0 C and OC to about 3.4-3.5 GHz. 12 caps work, but 30 caps are preferred.

My system already beats it in Sisoft Sandra and PCmark04. Haven't tried others yet.

Holy crap that is confusing.
 

marsomega

Member
Shogmaster said:
I love my two Athys but honestly.... the performance ratings for Athys are not any moe clear than the P4 situation.

Beats 4 different boards for 5 different processors with the same name...


Hugs Athlon, he didn't mean it baby...
 

Hitokage

Setec Astronomer
I'll just jump in to reitterate that ATI isn't just lagging behind in linux support, their "support" doesn't even exist. Their drivers are FAR buggier than anything you would have normally considered buggy, needlessly troublesome to install, and basically resemble the worst driverset one could imagine. My 9800pro choked on a fucking spinning gear demo. Not only that, when ATI does come out with a new release every so often, they only bump the version number after updating the card ID table and making tweaks that ironically reduce performance. I've heard that the drivers were outsourced in the first place, and now only one person does maintenance on them... but I don't know whether or not that's accurate.

You can use the opensource ATI card drivers that are infinitely better maintained and better to work with, but they don't support 3D for the newer Radeons(ATI being the ones with the necessary info to do so), and even 2D functions such as colorspace transform on those cards suck up CPU like crazy. Meanwhile, the drivers NVidia provide are on par performance and stability wise, tremendously simple to install, follow linux development fairly well, and are maintained with meaningful updates. NVidia provides full support for linux, but ATI pisses on it.

But of course, if you just run Windows, then none of what I just said will matter to you, and the normal driver arguments apply.
 

TigerKnee

Member
I have the BFG GeForce 6800GT OC and I couldn't be happier. If you're gonna spend $400 on a card, then this is the best buy at that particular price point.

FYI... Had a Radeon 9800 Pro before this. GREAT card and the drivers were NOT buggy. They're just as good as NVidia's. If you're looking to save money, then stick with the 9800 series. It should be able to play Doom3 and HL2 and respectable frame rates.
 

DaCocoBrova

Finally bought a new PSP, but then pushed the demon onto someone else. Jesus.
One thing I like about ATI is the driver support, it seems like there's a new one out there every couple of weeks

Oh the irony!
 

teh_pwn

"Saturated fat causes heart disease as much as Brawndo is what plants crave."
"Holy crap that is confusing."

Sort of.

Just remember you want the "C" processor. It's comparable to the AMD 64 3000+ in games, but owns AMD in applications.

The Barton XP 3000+ is comparible to the P4 "B" (533 FSB).

The Prescotts run really hot and don't overclock so well. The only thing they are good for is video editing.
 

Mashing

Member
If you don't plan on overclocking (sorry if this has already been answered, I'm at work) which card is best. 6800 GT or X800Pro?
 
Mashing said:
If you don't plan on overclocking (sorry if this has already been answered, I'm at work) which card is best. 6800 GT or X800Pro?

Yes, Mashing poses a good question: Which card is the absolute best card all-around if money is no object? (And is it upcoming or already out?)
 

Mrbob

Member
Mashing said:
If you don't plan on overclocking (sorry if this has already been answered, I'm at work) which card is best. 6800 GT or X800Pro?

I would say the 6800GT. Actually I'd go with the 6800GT in almost all cases over the X800PRO unless you find the X800Pro for significantly cheaper (70-100 bucks). Ironically, if you check pricewatch, you can find the 6800GT for 380-400 (Retail price) while the X800Pro still hovers over retail price at around 420 bucks.
 
Mrbob said:
I would say the 6800GT. Actually I'd go with the 6800GT in almost all cases over the X800PRO unless you find the X800Pro for significantly cheaper (70-100 bucks). Ironically, if you check pricewatch, you can find the 6800GT for 380-400 (Retail price) while the X800Pro still hovers over retail price at around 420 bucks.

MrBob, what about the X800 XT Platinum? I read a Computer Games magazine article with amazing benchmarks:

The test system was a 3.2 Ghz Pentium 4 with 1 GB RAM (exact same as my own PC specs).

They ran Far Cry at 1600x1200 with 4XAA and 8XAF at 64 fps!!!

That's absolutely astounding IMHO for a DX9 game. I would expect similar performance on Doom 3 and HL2 with that card as well. Does the 6800GT beat the X800 XT? If not, I'm selling my 9800 Pro 256 in a few weeks and picking up the X800 XT pronto.
 

Mrbob

Member
The X800XT is the most powerful card available. Some 6800 Ultra cards come close but the X800XT is a powerful beast.

At the $400 dollar pricepoint the 6800GT beats the X800PRO (In my opinion :p ), but in the $500 segment the X800XT beats the 6800 Ultra. I guess it comes down to how much you want to spend. If you want to spend a little more on the X800XT over the 6800GT you'll get a performance boost at high resolutions (1600 X 1200).

I guess this is how I would view the performance winners at these price ranges:

$200 - 9800 Pro
$300 - 6800 plain
$400 - 6800 GT
$500- X800XT
 
Mrbob said:
The X800XT is the most powerful card available. Some 6800 Ultra cards come close but the X800XT is a powerful beast.

At the $400 dollar pricepoint the 6800GT beats the X800PRO (In my opinion :p ), but in the $500 segment the X800XT beats the 6800 Ultra. I guess it comes down to how much you want to spend. If you want to spend a little more on the X800XT over the 6800GT you'll get a performance boost at high resolutions (1600 X 1200).

I guess this is how I would view the performance winners at these price ranges:

$200 - 9800 Pro
$300 - 6800 plain
$400 - 6800 GT
$500- X800XT

Excellent, thanks very much MrBob. Looks like I'll be buying the X800XT then. You think an extra gig of RAM would help performance on D3 and HL2?
 

epmode

Member
DJ Demon J said:
Looks like I'll be buying the X800XT then.
dj, if you manage to find it for $500, please let me know where. i've been looking for a month with no luck. time's running out for doom 3..
 

Mrbob

Member
Hmm, not sure about Half Life 2, but Doom 3 says it needs 2GB of ram to be maxxed out. Well, I believe it was also stated you need a 512MB video card to max out Doom 3 as well. But these are on the Ultra High Settings. I'm sure Very HIGH will still look great and play well.


What type of processor do you have? If you go the X800XT route going with a faster processor wouldn't hurt. I've seen Athlon 64 3800+ cpu tests still being cpu limited by the X800XT. So I guess it is comforting to know when you upgrade your processor/mobo you'll still get a boost from the X800XT.
 
Mrbob said:
Hmm, not sure about Half Life 2, but Doom 3 says it needs 2GB of ram to be maxxed out. Well, I believe it was also stated you need a 512MB video card to max out Doom 3 as well. But these are on the Ultra High Settings. I'm sure Very HIGH will still look great and play well.


What type of processor do you have? If you go the X800XT route going with a faster processor wouldn't hurt. I've seen Athlon 64 3800+ cpu tests still being cpu limited by the X800XT. So I guess it is comforting to know when you upgrade your processor/mobo you'll still get a boost from the X800XT.

I have a 3.2 Ghz P4 HT 800FSB CPU and 1GB of PC3700 DDR400 (or is it 800, I can never remember?) RAM.
 

epmode

Member
it would rock if ati/nvidia would stop developing new cards for a month just work on getting their current ones on store shelves. i'm astounded that there are all sorts of benchmarks for the x800xt and 6800 ultra, but it's literally impossible to find them in stores. and all i hear about is the next generation. pce express, sli, etc.
 
Oh yea, and PCI Express, what's this all about? Can someone explain? Is this new technology for existing PCI slots or are these new PCI slots on new motherboards? Are the 6800s and X800s PCI Express only?
 

Bregor

Member
DJ Demon J said:
Oh yea, and PCI Express, what's this all about? Can someone explain? Is this new technology for existing PCI slots or are these new PCI slots on new motherboards? Are the 6800s and X800s PCI Express only?

PCI Express is the replacement for the old PCI/AGP standard, and is totally incompatible with it. Either you go all PCI/AGP or you go all PCI Express. AFAIK, PCI Express motherboards and cards are still very rare, and the videocards get essentially no performance boost out of it currently.
 
And finally, an X800XT preview:

http://www.vr-zone.com/?i=931&s=1

Enough about the company, let's talk about the Visiontek Radeon X800XT Platinum Edition. The card itself has already hit various online retailers and brick and mortar stores expect it to come in within the next couple of weeks. Priced at around $450 online and at $499 in retail stores, expect to pay a premium for the card. The question that must be asked is if this card is worth the $450+ price tag. The answer is a resounding yes.

The Visiontek Radeon X800XT Platinum Edition really has all that you could ever ask for in a flagship graphics card. With support for HDTV, VIVO, improved Anti-Aliasing and Anisotropic Filtering, and unmatched raw performance, the Visiontek Radeon X800XT Platinum Edition is the fastest card that is currently available. Nvidia's GeForce 6800 Ultra is the card's only competition, but we still have not seen the 6800 Ultra readily available at any retailer we've checked.

The bottom line is that the Visiontek Radeon X800XT Platinum Edition is a fine piece of gaming hardware. If you are planning on putting together a rig just in time for the release of Doom 3 and Half Life 2 later this year, this card is one that would make an excellent fit. At around $499 a pop, this hit of Xtasy isn't cheap, but at least it's legal.
 
Bregor said:
PCI Express is the replacement for the old PCI/AGP standard, and is totally incompatible with it. Either you go all PCI/AGP or you go all PCI Express. AFAIK, PCI Express motherboards and cards are still very rare, and the videocards get essentially no performance boost out of it currently.

Thanks Bregor.
 

marsomega

Member
Bregor said:
PCI Express is the replacement for the old PCI/AGP standard, and is totally incompatible with it. Either you go all PCI/AGP or you go all PCI Express. AFAIK, PCI Express motherboards and cards are still very rare, and the videocards get essentially no performance boost out of it currently.


If anything, they get a performance decrease. ALL PCI Express counterparts are actually turning out to be slower then the AGP counterparts as far as the 6800 Ultra and X800 XT go.
 

Shompola

Banned
Why is PCI-E so bad right now? Did the motherboard chipset manufactorurs screw up? the ones who make the graphic cards screw up or a combination of both?
 

marsomega

Member
Shompola said:
Why is PCI-E so bad right now? Did the motherboard chipset manufactorurs screw up? the ones who make the graphic cards screw up or a combination of both?

First off, even with the bandwitdh increase, the port will never match the internal bandwitdh of the card. Whats great about PCI-E is its bi-directional properties which have many applications but for gaming not much is expected. Did the jump from AGP to 8X AGP have ny inpact to begin with?

I posted some great info on the first page if anyone is considering buying any of the next gen cards.
post

Here is the link to the beast.


EDIT: Just to let you know. CompUSA and BestBuy are your best chances. They are ATI launch partners and get priority from nvidia. Plus, they have the 50 dollar off dale. Meaning 349 for 6800 GT/ X800 Pro and 449 6800 Ultra/ X800 XT PE
 

epmode

Member
marsomega, comp usa and best buy are both selling the cards for 500. it was 450 a week or two ago, but i missed the sale.

by the way, i called visiontech. they're getting cards in next week, but they're all spoken for. the next shipment is 4 to 5 weeks later.
 

marsomega

Member
epmode said:
marsomega, comp usa and best buy are both selling the cards for 500. it was 450 a week or two ago, but i missed the sale.

by the way, i called visiontech. they're getting cards in next week, but they're all spoken for. the next shipment is 4 to 5 weeks later.

Yea that sucks. I got lucky and cashed in on the 434 Gateway sale. CDW had it for 454 for a while. Gateway's shot back up to 499.99.

I got some more bad news which goes in line with visiontech's estimate...

Rage3d said:
As evident by this page and this other page ATI has "unofficially officially" confirmed that the X800 Pro and X800XT PE won't be shipping until the middle of September. These ship dates only apply to ATI's own online shop of course, retailers should have them a lot sooner, but this gives all you pre-order guys something to hang your hat on.
 
Didn't think it was worth creating a new thread for, so here goes.

I'm looking to pick up a new graphics card. Thing is, I don't really want to break the bank, as consoles have always been, and continue to be where my real gaming passions lie. An XT800 or the like really isn't worth it for me.

I've managed for the past few years on a 32mb 3D Prophet card of some sort, and it's only recently that I've really had games struggle to run for me. That's another reason I don't really buy into the need for the latest and greatest GPU.

Given I'm perfectly happy playing at 1024x768, what are my options with regards to a cheap card that should achieve stable framerates (30-45+ pref) in most games for the next few years, at reasonably high settings?

EDIT: I'm also not pushed about AA. I'd prefer to have a stable framerate and higher visual settings in areas other than image quality
 

SantaC

Member
it's not true that X800XT is better than GF 6800Ultra. The benchmarks I saw was about even, but the 6800ultra actually bitchslapped the X800XT in some games.

1088615859aso9eqaJXw_3_2.gif



1088615859aso9eqaJXw_2_2.gif



I would go for a Ultra if I had the money. I am getting the GT though ;)


Welcome back nvidia!
 

marsomega

Member
Wait till late fall. ATI is going to introduce the X800 GT which will take over the 399 segment pushing the X800 PRO and X800 regular into the 249 and 299 segment. Which will also make the 9800 and 9700 pros cheaper.

A 9800 pro at under 200 bux is a steal. 9700 pro at 149 is practically a crime. Don't go near the 9200 's opr the 5200.5600, 5700 cards. At this point a 9800 or 9700 pro is your aim. With a 100 bux more in the fall you'll have you choice between a standard 6800, X800, and an X800 pro...

What do you mean bitchslap. With a single molex, lower power consuption, single slot, and cooler chip the X800 XT PE matches and performs better then the monster power hungry, double slot, dust buster 6800 Ultra. Not to mention the X800 XT PE just begs to be overclocked.
 
SantaCruZer said:
it's not true that X800XT is better than GF 6800Ultra. The benchmarks I saw was about even, but the 6800ultra actually bitchslapped the X800XT in some games.

1088615859aso9eqaJXw_3_2.gif



1088615859aso9eqaJXw_2_2.gif



I would go for a Ultra if I had the money. I am getting the GT though ;)


Welcome back nvidia!

Umm, these benchmarks you posted are in favor of X800XT. X800XT outperforms 6800 at 1600x1200 resolution.
 

SantaC

Member
DJ Demon J said:
Umm, these benchmarks you posted are in favor of X800XT. X800XT outperforms 6800 at 1600x1200 resolution.

umm how? Overall the 6800u numbers are better...
 
SantaCruZer said:
umm how? Overall the 6800u numbers are better...

You need to read the chart correctly. The "overall" numbers for 6800 cards were at those resolutions. It's been this way between Nvidia and ATI for a while now, Nvidia scores a 1-4 fps higher than ATI at 1024 and 1280 resolutions, then ATI bitchslaps Nvidia at 1600 resolutions. Also, ATI maintains high fps (and higher than Nvidia cards) even with high levels of anti-aliasing and anisotropic filtering enabled.
 

SantaC

Member
IJoel said:
Did you read at what resolutions they were testing each card?

fuck I just saw. I had no idea they had the X800XT as a different resolution. This is embarresing. Sorry :(
 

Hitokage

Setec Astronomer
bionic77 said:
So ATI's card is superior once again or is it just with certain games?
Only with AA/AF enabled. It doesn't take a large fps hit with them on while the 6800 does. That's why you have some benchmarks with the 6800 on top and others with the x800 on top.
 

tenchir

Member
Hitokage said:
Only with AA/AF enabled. It doesn't take a large fps hit with them on while the 6800 does. That's why you have some benchmarks with the 6800 on top and others with the x800 on top.

Who the hell would buy a 400+ dollars card AND NOT use AF/AA?
 
And I just bught a ATI 9800 Pro a few months back. Seriously...as long as I can play Doom 3 and Half-Life 2 with decent framerate and effects I'm good to go. Video Card prices are getting insane. The technolgy is cool, but I cant keep switching cards every 6 months. Everyone was raving ATI a few months back, now it's Nvidia. It nevers ends......
 

Mrbob

Member
Apharmd Battler said:
And I just bught a ATI 9800 Pro a few months back. Seriously...as long as I can play Doom 3 and Half-Life 2 with decent framerate and effects I'm good to go. Video Card prices are getting insane. The technolgy is cool, but I cant keep switching cards every 6 months. Everyone was raving ATI a few months back, now it's Nvidia. It nevers ends......

I bought a 9800PROa month ago to play these games at 1024 X 768. You should be fine.

I remember seeing some early doom 3 alpha tests where the 9800 PRO was hitting almost 60FPS at 1024 X 768 (on a 2.2 ghzcpu/1gig ram setup). We should be fine. As long as the resolution isn't bumped sky high (1600 X 1200 or 1280 X 1024).
 
Top Bottom