Skill? Being good at the Souls games is not about skill, it's all about trial & error and patience.People who don't enjoy Souls games lack skills and patience, and that's ok.
Skill? Being good at the Souls games is not about skill, it's all about trial & error and patience.
And I love Demon's Souls and Dark Souls.
Skill? Being good at the Souls games is not about skill, it's all about trial & error and patience.
And I love Demon's Souls and Dark Souls.
Japanese Devs are better at making fighting games than Western Devs are.
This gen so far, I've more excited for HD re-releases than new ips. (With a few exceptions.)
How is that controversial AT ALL?
Bethesda make great worlds, but their games can be technically awful and they get too many free passes for it. I tend to find the gameplay also loses its lustre very quickly and I want to progress as quickly as possible to end it after the 7th or 8th hour.
I'm still going to get Fallout 4 day 1, though.
I can't see the lies.- Portrait of Ruin is the best DS Castlevania game.
- Final Fantasy X is a game I could do without but X-2 is one of my fav games of all time.
That's not controversial at all, that's pretty much true.Perfect Dark is miles better than Goldeneye. There's not even a contest.
demon souls dark souls 1 and 2 and bloodbourne
ARE NOT FUN
it has nothing to do with SKILL.
the games are a total time waste
Half-Life 2 is vastly overrated and was outdone by several other FPSs that were out around that time.
Agreed.I like it how people use this game as a badge of honour and if you 'don't get it' then you must be bad at the game and/or games.
1) It is entirely possible to not like the game because you just don't like it
2) Even if you are 'bad' at the game it does not matter. Being good at it does not make that person a higher brow of games player.
Never played it. Don't have a PS4Have you tried Bloodborne yet? It's just as good.
I don't know how controversial is but I actually think that Tales of Vesperia is nothing but absolute trash, Yuri is one of the most boring and indecisive protagonist that series ever had (even worse than Luke), the Battle system is completly Eugh and even those "nice graphics" look incredible bland.
Just dissapointing all around and the only Tales of game I never completed (It was also my first Tales of game) but thank god Tales of Graces F and Abyss 3DS happened.
I can't see the lies.
Wtf. Abyss is way worse than Vesperia.
Metal Gear Solid 2 is the best Metal Gear.
Quoted for truth!MLB The Show is the greatest sports title of ALL sports games.
I love MGS2 since day 1 and the Raiden "suprise" was acutally great. Raiden was a cool guy in MGS2. Liked him a lot.That's actually becoming less controversial as time passes. I think now people are over the fact you play as Raiden, they've accepted the gameplay to be top notch and the narrative to be the pinnacle of the series.
I still prefer 3 though.
That's actually becoming less controversial as time passes. I think now people are over the fact you play as Raiden, they've accepted the gameplay to be top notch and the narrative to be the pinnacle of the series.
I still prefer 3 though.
The only Smash I'd enjoy for competitive play is Melee or for hacks, Project M. At this point though, Melee has been picked to death in tier lists and there's only a few characters used for competitive play, probably because they can use those advanced mechanics better than other characters. Project M is probably the best active Smash hack available, and it combines the best properties all Smash games so that it works for people on any skill level while still retaining advanced mechanics and a much more balanced character set. I wish Project M would replace Smash 4, but I doubt that will happen anytime soon.I think Smash, on the whole, aren't very good games. Sometimes they can be fun if you have some crazy multiplayer party brawler moments, but I will never understand why anyone wanted to shoehorn it into something competitive or where the entertainment comes from in that scene -- but people seem to like it. I'm still a bit salty that it took up 3 hours of EVO's championship Sunday and pushed KI top 8 to Saturday night, but not much I can do about that.
Evolve is a great game that got crushed by half right assumptions, and entitlement.
Can you expand on the entitlement comment, please? I'm interested to know what you mean.
People complaining about the base game,and season passes. And feeling like all cosmetic skins should've been free or unlockable through in game progress.
Masses of people were put off simply because they felt it was a rip to pay for the cosmetic DLC that was purely cosmetic.
The base game did seem very bare to justify a £35 (Steam) price tag, in my opinion. Not surprised to see that it's dead.
These images are ridiculously stupid.
Imho, video games are better than ever right now.
- More diverse and varied than ever (in terms of genres and gameplay systems)
- More accessible than ever
- Better-looking than ever
- More content-rich than ever
- Better value than ever (Steam, regular digital discounts/sales, humble bundles, PS+, Games with Gold etc being fantastic value)
Half-Life 1/2 are just normal good shooters with a boring main character. Totally overrated. Nothing amazing (I played them at release and replayed them last year ... But nope, nothing special about them) . Also they were already totally outclassed by F.E.A.R. 1/2 when it comes to mechanics. People should rather hope for a proper F.E.A.R. 4 instead of chasing the HL3 unicorn. Valve should focus on the steam plattform and vulkan/vr instead of making HL3.
In rebuke & agreement, FEAR has a terrible story and horrid voice acting, but that gameplay... Wow. It's still bloody fun 10 years later.
The story of HL was also nothing mindblowing... A shooter should have good mechanics first IMO. Shooting has to be fun. Story and FPS games ... The only decent one I can remember is Bioshock. And Half-Life had nothing that stood out for me. It was good in every department but thats it. Nothing special. Just standard stuff except for the gravity gun fun.