404.
Lorem ipsum other castle, arrow to the knee set up us the bomb.
This UI is a mess.
Yes, nothing changes really in the streaming factor, just instead of your stream being sent to Twitch you send it to YouTube. OBS, Xsplit, etc will all work fine. Now, as for the capture card natively streaming to YouTube without a third-party streaming program I do not know. I use AverMedia and its native streaming program allows me to, can't say if Elgatos. It is better to just use OBS anyways.
most important thing is HOW MUCH IS THE DELAY ?
any techies:?
I don't get the complaints, love it so far. Very smooth experience all round. Skipping to an earlier part of the stream is pretty much instantaneous, which alone is enough to make me stick with YouTube over Twitch when given the choice.
Okay so let me ask you this since you seem fairly knowledgeable in this area; what's the best solution for high quality streaming and simultaneous recording?
Out of curiosity what about it is better than twitch to you? I have only messed around with it for a few minutes and my only complaint is the UI.definitely better than twitch IMO.
definitely better than twitch IMO.
Once you get used to the layout I think it is fine but I agree first time using it is a clusterfuck but after 30mins I think it is better than Twitch.
If there's one thing I hope this does to Twitch it's pushing for zero delay on stream.Youtube's live streams take a dump on Twitch's. Instant replay is huge.
In no world does this lead to a better UX than twitch
The amount of scrolling you have to do to see at least, say, just a dozen channels is absurd.
In no world does this lead to a better UX than twitch
..
opinions or fact?
I like the video page, but not so much the rest of the UI. I've had it stick to the top and bottom of the page.
opinions or fact?
IMO, in no world does this lead to a better UX than twitch.
Objectively, you have to interact with the site much more to still see much less compared to twitch. This doesn't even include the fact that a game's landing page doesn't just include streams but rather a hybrid of all its media. IMO, I never had an issue looking for non-streaming content on YouTube, so them trying to make the experience all inclusive is mostly in vein in my opinion. IMO, finding content is as important as watching content itself. IMO, you're better off currently using an android emulator with the mobile app to use the service to browse.
I am not sure I am understanding you. There is a live tab right there. Click on that, pretty simple.
Right, you click another link to list only streams. I'm making the distinction that the landing page doesn't inherently just list streams.
UI is interesting and I actually appreciate that there are music app "playlist" type widgets, but I agree it's probably too busy. I assume they were trying to give it an appeal, but maybe simplicity would've been better. Are the skin and widgets customizable?
Opinion or fact?
http://i.imgur.com/lyc4X1m.png[/ig][/QUOTE]
Already edited my post. Anyway that is a small detail. Is it that big of a deal?
Youtube gives you far more info that twitch per game.
Not only is it for streaming but I can see let's plays, company uploaded videos, reviews, etc. for the specific game.
This is great.
If I want to know about a game, instead of going to youtube and searching looking through many videos, I will go to youtubegaming and get all the info I need.
Right, you click another link to list only streams. I'm making the distinction that the landing page doesn't inherently just list streams.
Legitimately curious, which streaming site do you guys think has the best UI for their main pages?
For those commenting on the homepage UI..
First, thanks for the feedback.
Second, we're working on a few performance issues that have cropped up during the launch regarding loading on gaming.youtube.com. Stay tuned.
Additionally, try importing / adding your gaming channels you already subscribe to on YT and also add your favorite games. The homepage takes on a much different feel once it's the channels and games that you love.