• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

R.Mika's Critical Art is censored in the latest build of SF5

Status
Not open for further replies.

RM8

Member
streetfighter4.jpg
Honestly, even in that pic, I feel like her thighs look slightly thinner than this:

 
But we have no confirmation that they changed the camera angle because it was offensive or unacceptable. Like others said, it could be because of glitches, performance related issues, or they just felt like changing it to a static angle.

Correct, it's not necessarily censorship (in that we don't know for sure) - but it's very much possible that it was the case. And to reiterate before some "master of logic" strawmans my posts - I personally think this character's designs and animations are gross and perverted - but completely changing sexually suggestive animations like that usually aren't done because of performance related issues. Ken's hair clips and glitches through his model in game and that hasn't been altered - for example.
 

Zolo

Member
I don't know if it's funny or sad that this of all threads reached 20 pages in like 3 hours. "Censorship" doesn't mean what you think it means and this thread never needed to be made. Game's a WIP and is always in flux. This change could have been for any number of reasons. Capcom's shown a DGAF attitude around feminist/SJW ramblings around this game so far so I doubt it's because of any criticism in that regard. Still, if it means triggering some weab somewhere out there I'm all for it.

These types of threads always get these numbers of pages.

I'm guessing it's mostly due to the same users arguing with each other over a large number of pages than more that a lot of users are involved?
 

Mik317

Member
Because of the fact that Mika's a female character people would be upset for a very different reason and generally much more accepting that things change during development.

People are freaking out over every little change, period.

Mainly because we have been able to play the game and see things...so if Dan had an ass smacking taunt super that was altered...I imagine those who cared would be rather miffed.

I think most of the outrage is over the top and dumb but the bottom line people generally aren't happy when you change things they liked, moreso if it is done poorly (like it is here) and even moreso if it's done because people complained about it (not as likely imo).

Here is the crux of these threads, people don't like things like enjoy to get altered to appease another group especially when they don't agree with the change. As such, you get the back and fourth, the name calling, the stupid rage and all the fun we generally have in these thread because "you are changing what I like into something I don't". I understand what both sides are coming from in that case. On one hand, why should I have to basically give up something I enjoy to appeal to a party that could easily go find something they like and leave me alone. On the other hand, well for one its not that serious...as this is goddam videogames and also just grow up? But it is difficult in any sense, because those asking for change more than likely aren't that interested in the first place and the final product ends up being something no one likes (this won't be because of ass slapping...it will be if Capcom keeps dropping nerf bombs all over lolololol).

That is my only concern in these threads...I am all for equality. I play female characters anytime I get a chance to because of the rarity (in CAP games its because I am awful at creating cool looking dudes tho) but I also feel like there is less of a push for diversity and more of a lets take away from things I actually don't care about in the name of diversity. I don't like FPS and while I was butthurt during the diluge of FPS all day errday a few years back, I also didn't ask for FPS games to stop or change to suit my needs but for games that I like and did suit my needs to be made. I just feel like these threads are full of people fighting the wrong battle.

but honestly tho..this thread is silly. I am pretty sure, the ass slap will return and if it doesn't...its not the end of the world.
 

RM8

Member
IMO, it appears Chun skipped leg day for arm day. They look more muscular.
Well, at least I'm not alone in thinking her legs look a bit thinner! :p Maybe she was thigh-gap-shamed by Cammy.

Expectations. MK has always been the extreme one. SF has always been more family friendy yet still edgy.
Yup. Being rated M is actually a requirement from the MK fanbase, they were super disappointed with MK vs. DC.
 

Vice

Member
MK X had a MA rating and sold over 3 million. A fighting games rating really means jack when it comes to sales. It decisions like this show why Capcom is barely hanging on as a company.
Expectations. MK has always been the extreme one. SF has always been more family friendy yet still edgy.
 

Gbraga

Member
but honestly tho..this thread is silly. I am pretty sure, the ass slap will return and if it doesn't...its not the end of the world.

Yep, but they should really remove it in this case. Keeping the slap sound but hiding it is so dumb...
 

Crossing Eden

Hello, my name is Yves Guillemot, Vivendi S.A.'s Employee of the Month!
Correct, it's not necessarily censorship (in that we don't know for sure) - but it's very much possible that it was the case. And to reiterate before some "master of logic" strawmans my posts - I personally think this character's designs and animations are gross and perverted - but completely changing sexually suggestive animations like that usually aren't done because of performance related issues. Ken's hair clips and glitches through his model in game and that hasn't been altered - for example.
It is possible. But that explanation makes little sense, unless of course, there are more changes coming that we don't know about, like a design change.
 

Kaljinyu

Member
I won't even begin to go into how Bayonetta is NOTHING like Dead or Alive except that both employ sexual bits content.

HOW that sexual content is used, however, is completely different. The context is different. The intentions behind it are different.

Again, it's like saying a "bikini" is bad. You can't simplify it like that. Context and use matter.

But, in short, a lot of feminists like Bayonetta because that "fanservice" is handled different than Dead or Alive. In Bayonetta's case, she's the one holding the keys and she is fully in charge of her sexual identity. She only lets people see what she wants them to see, she only gives what she wants to give. She wields sex as a weapon against OTHERS, rather than, like so many other women in games, being on the receiving end of it.

Sex in and of itself is neither a good or bad thing. It's how it is used. It's the context. It's why Bayonetta's use is actually quite progressive while Duke Nukem slapping boobs sticking out of a wall and giggling like a moron are regressive. Both use sex, but one uses them for good reasons and other just because they can.

I hear this a lot about Bayonetta. That's she's "in charge of her sexuality" and how that's really great and stuff. But when we call games out for being pervy, we call them out for being pervy. Not because "The women didn't have enough control in the situation." It's not "complicated" or "neither a good thing or a bad thing" when other not-so-good games do it.

If the pandering we see in games like DOA is bad because you shouldn't use characters for sexual pandering, which is the opinion I hear when it's other games, why/how is it not sexual pandering when it's Bayonetta? Or when it's Mika?
 

Crossing Eden

Hello, my name is Yves Guillemot, Vivendi S.A.'s Employee of the Month!
I hear this a lot about Bayonetta. That's she's "in charge of her sexuality" and how that's really great and stuff. But when we call games out for being pervy, we call them out for being pervy. Not because "The women didn't have enough control in the situation." It's not "complicated" or "neither a good thing or a bad thing" when other not-so-good games do it.

If the pandering we see in games like DOA is bad because you shouldn't use characters for sexual pandering, which is the opinion I hear when it's other games, why/how is it not sexual pandering when it's Bayonetta? Or when it's Mika?
Bayo 2 also kinda threw that excuse out the window when they still kept up the leering camera when she was in legitimate danger in a cutscene.
 
It is possible. But that explanation makes little sense, unless of course, there are more changes coming that we don't know about, like a design change.

They might have had to town down the suggestive animations of the character in order for the design to pass ratings boards so that the game can get a marketable rating. Unfortunately, this sort of dance happens all the time where toning something like this down would be the only way for them to keep the design in the first place. I totally understand the decision even if that's what it came down to, but to say it isn't censorship is the sort of "we need to change what words mean because-- WHO CARES!??" attitude that has been permeating this board for a while.
 
Yeah, they did a piss poor job at "fixing' it if that was their idea.

I would think they could maybe keep the teen rating, if that is the issue, if they just pulled out the camera slightly when she slapped.

The camera work as it is now just looks dumb, and not in a fun way.
 
Meta-argument if any one cares to engage:

Welp, I've read the entire thread and, unfortunately, it went exactly as I expected it to.

Claims of censorship, arguments about what censorship means, pre-order cancelled posts, people saying that those people who cancelled are man babies or whiners, etc.

Very little discussion about why Capcom did this, or why they would do this.

OT:

It's way too early to get a response from Capcom right now, but I could easily see this happening if they are trying to get a lower age group rating. This might be the first of many changes that we see if that's the case. It's funny because the protracted campaign of reveal videos and betas showed us a vision of the game that we might not have seen in previous years, and now leaves certain fans upset as they enjoyed the game as "originally" shown.

In any case I think the next update will reveal a lot about the intention of this if we don't get an official response.
 

Zolo

Member
Bayo 2 also kinda threw that excuse out the window when they still kept up the leering camera when she was in legitimate danger in a cutscene.

Yeah. I always thought those types of arguments were kind of weird since she can't really control a leering camera.

To be honest, I'm not really sure what the change is for though. If if it's from controversy, the bigger one to me now seems more that ALL females aside from Karin are dressed very provocatively. Changing a butt slap doesn't change that it's still a very sexualized game. If it's from ratings, there are games that get away with a lot more that still get a 'T' rating.
 

RM8

Member
They might have had to town down the suggestive animations of the character in order for the design to pass ratings boards so that the game can get a marketable rating.
If the slap is truly gone (somehow I doubt it is), it's absolutely because of this. These ratings can be pretty arbitrary, which is why Mika can wear a handful of blue strips of fabric, but the slapping is a nope.
 
I hear this a lot about Bayonetta. That's she's "in charge of her sexuality" and how that's really great and stuff. But when we call games out for being pervy, we call them out for being pervy. Not because "The women didn't have enough control in the situation." It's not "complicated" or "neither a good thing or a bad thing" when other not-so-good games do it.

If the pandering we see in games like DOA is bad because you shouldn't use characters for sexual pandering, which is the opinion I hear when it's other games, why/how is it not sexual pandering when it's Bayonetta? Or when it's Mika?

His whole argument is that Bayonetta is NOT using sexual pandering though, if you actually read it.
 

Crossing Eden

Hello, my name is Yves Guillemot, Vivendi S.A.'s Employee of the Month!
They might have had to town down the suggestive animations of the character in order for the design to pass ratings boards so that the game can get a marketable rating. Unfortunately, this sort of dance happens all the time where toning something like this down would be the only way for them to keep the design in the first place. I totally understand the decision even if that's what it came down to, but to say it isn't censorship is the sort of "we need to change what words mean because-- WHO CARES!??" attitude that has been permeating this board for a while.
Yea it's a slippery slope when it comes to ratings boards. But again, I'm not eager to call it censorship or to oppose the decision.

Yeah. I always thought those types of arguments were kind of weird since she can't really control a leering camera.

To be honest, I'm not really sure what the change is for though. If if it's from controversy, the bigger one to me now seems more that ALL females aside from Karin are dressed very provocatively. Changing a butt slap doesn't change that it's still a very sexualized game. If it's from ratings, there are games that get away with a lot more that still get a 'T' rating.
Exactly.
 

Garlador

Member
Bayo 2 also kinda threw that excuse out the window when they still kept up the leering camera when she was in legitimate danger in a cutscene.

Haven't played Bayonetta 2 yet (own it though), but Bayonetta 1 at least was pretty awesome in that regard. The heroine was sexy when she wanted to be, but when it came time to get serious, the game stopped goofing around and let he take care of business.
 

Akibared

Member
Yeah. I always thought those types of arguments were kind of weird since she can't really control a leering camera.

To be honest, I'm not really sure what the change is for though. If if it's from controversy, the bigger one to me now seems more that ALL females aside from Karin are dressed very provocatively. Changing a butt slap doesn't change that it's still a very sexualized game. If it's from ratings, there are games that get away with a lot more that still get a 'T' rating.

Yeah isn't the ESRB a bit more relaxed nowadays? I can't see why that would get them slapped with an M rating.
 

kewlmyc

Member
Just remove the buttslap altogether then. Having her slap her butt offscreen just looks odd. Just give her a different pose, like flexing her arm or just pointing.
 

K.Sabot

Member
I think the phrase "Senran Kagura Burst is rated T" should stop the "they did it because they didn't want it to be rated M" arguments.
 

213372bu

Banned
Both sides are ending up with these long-winded 8 page posts on both sides trying to explain why the other is more outrageous and problematic than the other.

But all these tangents are taking away from the discussion; let's get on topic here:

We love the booty

They took away the booty

We need the booty back.
 

Crossing Eden

Hello, my name is Yves Guillemot, Vivendi S.A.'s Employee of the Month!
I think the phrase "Senran Kagura Burst is rated T" should stop the "they did it because they didn't want it to be rated M" arguments.
The "outrage" about the butt slap being very miniscule when you compare it to actual media outrages should throw that argument out as well.
 

Kaljinyu

Member
His whole argument is that Bayonetta is NOT using sexual pandering though, if you actually read it.

I know, that's my confusion. Why is it cool for Bayo to do things that get most games marked as "ecchi" or whatever the term is? Why isn't it pandering for her to thrust her ass and tits into the camera in whatever that victory thing was she did. but it is pandering when DOA Xtreme 2 presents you with wet, jiggling mounds in the intro?
 

BobLoblaw

Banned
Both sides are ending up with these long-winded 8 page posts on both sides trying to explain why the other is more outrageous and problematic than the other.

But all these tangents are taking away from the discussion; let's get on topic here:

We love the booty

They took away the booty

We need the booty back.
Booty Back DLC Pack incoming.
 
I seriously think that they removed it because it affected the flow of the gameplay. They made the super flash much quicker, and the ass slap probably looked really awkward if they zoomed in on it.

I mean, they may have removed it for practical reasons. And I'm pretty sure someone mentioned it earlier but they may have removed the wishbone because of other models (Zangief).
 

Kaljinyu

Member
Senran Kagura Burst is rated T. If this would have been rated M, it wouldn't have been because of a single ass slap.

If I can say something about that, by all standards Burst should've been rated M. It was rated M equivalent everywhere else in the world, including Japan. I'm thinking it got away with an T rating the same way other digital download only games get away with the ratings they get: The ESRB lets publishers self-regulate when their games are digital download only. The ESRB itself doesn't really review those. Instead, this questionnaire thing is sent out and the publisher fills it out themselves.
 
Guys I'm working on a game with a girl who is nothing but ass

I promise to have a promotional image released during development cropped funny so you guys might think I nerfed the ass. Then you can concoct censorship conspiracy theories around this instead of considering that I may have cropped it funny, I may need to shoot for an ESRB rating, or I may have made changes to my game which is still in development.

Please look forward to that time when you can again jump to predictable conclusions and start another thread to join the ranks of this, the ESRB thread, and that thread about how more women own consoles than men that ended up devolving into how that's because they are all soccer Moms who don't know a controller from a tampon

Then we can all talk some more later about how women apprently being underrepresented on this forum is clearly because they aren't interested in games, and not at all related to the content and quality of discussion on offer
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom