This is not a Sony phenomenon. Microsoft fans did it last gen when 360 is in the lead over PS3, Nintendo fans did it to both of them with Wii sales and DS > PSP sales. And it happens every generation. I don't disagree with the notion that merely calling someone salty kills "actual intelligent discussion" in of itself. But look at the posts that typically make someone say you're salty.
"PS4 has no games, why is it doing well? I don't understand it!" is the average refrain that makes people say someone is salty. In what way did you expect intellectual conversation to arise from that? Those people haven't demonstrated they really want conversation, instead they're just mad something which doesn't have extremely specific and arbitrary categories of games they want is successful. They can't even acknowledge PS4 has more higher rated games, more exclusives and keeps selling tons of software to the very people they're gobsmacked ever wanted it in the first place. These are facts, and ones we can gain separate from our subjective evaluation on the quality of the games.
So intellectually both comments are a deadend. I'd say people should just stop responding to such individuals since they clearly don't want to contribute anyway.
It's not that they've done a pisspoor job of supporting the thing with software. Compare the Sony exclusives from Sony in 2015 and their ratings to the ones for Microsoft in 2015. Very comparable. Bloodborne is one of the highest rated games of the generation, Until Dawn has become a cult hit with very positive reviews, Tearaway is an astonishing game which might as well be a full sequel with all the new content. And I'm just touching the surface of games from Sony.
And much of where the "interpretation" of poor software comes from is that the type of software they've been able to offer this year is not from their biggest franchises, and that much of their biggest games got delayed into 2016. But they still had tons on offer, even from first party.
See, again, what this amounts to is simply you not getting the games you personally wanted, not whether or not Sony actually failed to deliver to its customers great first party titles. They did, and most reviewed well. You just didn't like them.
See you say as much here. For you, "good software" and a "good effort" from Sony = MUST HAVE THEIR BIGGEST FRANCHISES. Nevermind how good Bloodborne or Tearaway or Until Dawn are. They're not their BIGGEST FRANCHISES. Sony acknowledged they didn't have the lineup they wanted due to development delays, but I don't think they should have even said that. Because we need to get away from the idea that only the most AAA of AAA titles amounts to good lineups.
On top of that, the implication from posts like your own is that "development delays" somehow equals Sony not trying hard enough or being lazy. The reality, however, is that they delay games because they are not up to their quality standards, and they take a financial hit for doing so. The opposite of being lazy. It's doing the hard thing for the right reasons.
Where is your evidence they are buying it more for hardware or software? FYI, the data does not support this. The software attach rate is quite good and comparable to XBO.